Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
0023/01/15 21:54:19
Subject: What GW colour would you recommend for flesh?
Like if I were to only use 1 colour instead of many different ones, which tone do you think is most likely a good buy? Maybe I'll apply a wash to make the recesses between the muscles darker, but overall it should be one color.
Ravenous D wrote: 40K is like a beloved grandparent that is slowly falling into dementia and the rest of the family is in denial about how bad it is.
squidhills wrote: GW is scared of girls. Why do you think they have so much trouble sculpting attractive female models? Because girls have cooties and the staff at GW don't like looking at them for too long because it makes them feel funny in their naughty place.
2015/01/15 22:08:58
Subject: Re:What GW colour would you recommend for flesh?
Wait Cadian Fleshtone is a thing? I'd say Kislev flesh, although if you use XV88 right it could make a decent tan, and it really depends on the type of army you have. Vallhalla, Vostroya, Cadian, other, Orkish?
I am obviously a genius. Wether good or evil, well, that all depends on what I had for breakfast.
http://www.johnstons.org/roy/comics/farside/fs09.gif
Copy paste that URL
Arcsquad12: a Burrito is not an orgy.
2015/01/15 22:43:49
Subject: Re:What GW colour would you recommend for flesh?