Switch Theme:

Bloody formations!! :D  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Fresh-Faced New User




Hey guys could do with help in these rules regarding formations.

Right

My friend uses formations for everything his 1500pt army consists of two formations is that legal? Me myself I would say it's unbound because there is nothing compulsory about it?? And it seems to troll normal armies I maybe wrong but your help will sort my query out

Thanks guys n gals
   
Made in fr
Guard Heavy Weapon Crewman



France, Paris

Formations are a special type of detachment (that can also be inside another detachment, such as necron decurion), so yes it is legal.

   
Made in gb
Fresh-Faced New User




Ok pal thanks for that
   
Made in us
Confessor Of Sins




WA, USA

A way to think about it (and I also went through this as well) is to think of the Combined Arms Detatchment as a type of formation as well.

 Ouze wrote:

Afterward, Curran killed a guy in the parking lot with a trident.
 
   
Made in us
Grey Knight Purgator firing around corners




southern Ohio

Myliel wrote:
Formations are a special type of detachment (that can also be inside another detachment, such as necron decurion), so yes it is legal.



Core Rulebook, pg 121, (Formations)
Formations are a special type of Detachment, each a specific grouping of units renowned for their effectiveness on the battlefields of the 41st Millennium. Whilst some Formations provide you with all the gaming information you will need to use them in your games, it is not uncommon for them simply to describe a number of special rules that apply when you include several specific units together. Instead of including a Force Organisation chart, the Army List Entries that comprise a Formation are listed on it, along with any special rules that those units gain. Unless stated otherwise, each individual unit maintains its normal Battlefield Role when taken as part of a Formation.

Unlike other Detachments, Formations can also be taken as part of Unbound armies (pg117). If they are, their units maintain the special rules gained for being part of the Formation.


Core Rulebook, pg 118, (Detachments)
There is no limit to the number of Detachments a Battleforged army can include and you can use any mixture of Detachments you have available, within the restrictions of the rules that follow. However, all of the units in your army must belong to a Detachment and no unit can belong to more than one detachment.


A Formation is a Detachment, and no unit can belong to more than one Detachment. Having a Battleforged list that consists of only Formations is Legal. Having a Formation with some of its units also counting as being in another Detachment is not.

If the Necrons have some sort of special rule that supersedes the Core Rulebook, please share it.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Why is this in proposed rules instead of "You Make Da Call"?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/03/31 20:16:49


 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: