Switch Theme:

Opinion on using outdated models.  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Shrieking Traitor Sentinel Pilot






Kansas City, MO

I'm down to clown.
Made in us
Shrieking Traitor Sentinel Pilot






Kansas City, MO

Good recent example of petre's point would be looking at the scale of the new bloodthirster kit versus the previous one. It begins to become a LoS concern at those scales. Another reason would be the base size differences can make an impact, positive or negative. Flesh hounds just went from bike ovals to 50mm rounds and this changes how the unit as a whole since its footprint is now much larger.

Again, I'd be game for playing with old models, but I try to keep my stuff based to current proportions and my counts-as models are of relative same size. I also wouldn't want to ditch old models just because their old. I've rehabbed a number already.
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: