Switch Theme:

Heavy Flamer...why restrict it so much?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Bounding Assault Marine





Illinois

I play Salamanders SM's and I find it to be the height of stupidity that I cannot take heavy flamers except on my Sterngard and Terminators squads. What's the point on restricting this weapon so much? Everyone can take gravcannons so what's the big deal with taking a heavier flame thrower?

Especially with a Chapter that specializes in "Burn, Heretic!" Tactics.
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut




I dunno. All the more reason to condense the Marine books outside Grey Knights into a singular codex.

CaptainStabby wrote:
If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.

 jy2 wrote:
BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.

 vipoid wrote:
Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?

 MarsNZ wrote:
ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
 
   
Made in de
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator






Hamburg

You could play a successor chapter of BA.
Tactical BA Marines have access to heavy flamers.

Former moderator 40kOnline

Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!

Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a "" I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."

Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss 
   
Made in us
Bounding Assault Marine





Illinois

Personally I just think that Salamanders aren't as popular a Chapter option out of the main SM codex as some of the other chapters so GW didn't really bother to see how that (albeit small) restriction on flamer weapons made no sense for them in particular.

I do believe they should have just streamlined all the Marines into one Dex and then made small side books for each chapter (like they did with Iron Hands and Imperial Fists).
   
Made in ru
!!Goffik Rocker!!






 bomtek80 wrote:
Personally I just think that Salamanders aren't as popular a Chapter option out of the main SM codex as some of the other chapters so GW didn't really bother to see how that (albeit small) restriction on flamer weapons made no sense for them in particular.


fixed dat for you.
   
Made in au
Missionary On A Mission




Australia

Sisters of Battle can take Heavy Flamers all over the place :>



 
   
Made in us
Deranged Necron Destroyer





 GoonBandito wrote:
Sisters of Battle can take Heavy Flamers all over the place :>




to add on. Because sisters need more fire daka

It's easy to assume that people arguing an interpretation you disagree with are just looking for an advantage for themselves... But it's quite often not the case.  
   
Made in us
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar





Upstate, New York

Because the HF bit is only on the SG/terminator sprue?

GW will occasionally make strange restrictions based on what can be found in the kits. We didn’t always have MMs in tac squads either. As more multi-part plastic PA HFs get made, I’d expect to see the restriction lifted in the next codex or the one after that.

   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: