Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/02 01:38:01
Subject: Battle tech tomahawk toys conversion (Imperial knight proxies)
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
This model is made from a old 7 inch matchbox toy. There is a lot of modification, if you are interested you can see some work in progress pic in that thread:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/515208.page
it's approximately the size of a imperial knight and with the chainsaw arms i made i could easily replace one.
Both arms are magnetized
hope you like it!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/02 09:34:33
Subject: Battle tech tomahawk toys conversion (Imperial knight proxies)
|
 |
Stabbin' Skarboy
|
Awesome indeed but lacks the gothic industrial feel that 40k imperial stuff has. maybe a face plate or reshape of the visor would be all it would take regardless great work
|
3500pts 1500pts 2500pts 4500pts 3500pts 2000pts 2000pts plus several small AOS armies |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/02 09:43:19
Subject: Battle tech tomahawk toys conversion (Imperial knight proxies)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Zognob Gorgoff wrote:Awesome indeed but lacks the gothic industrial feel that 40k imperial stuff has. maybe a face plate or reshape of the visor would be all it would take regardless great work
Agreed. I looks like a nice model, but it would stand out in a 40k game as "not belonging."
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/02 10:15:00
Subject: Battle tech tomahawk toys conversion (Imperial knight proxies)
|
 |
Inspiring SDF-1 Bridge Officer
|
damn, seeing the original toy this was taken for, that looks incredible.
|
It never ends well |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/02 10:16:03
Subject: Battle tech tomahawk toys conversion (Imperial knight proxies)
|
 |
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche
|
Those Macross Destroids are such great designs. The Tomahawk was always second in my heart, after the Monster.
Now if someone would just make one a wee bit taller so I can use it as a Warlord.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/02 15:35:56
Subject: Re:Battle tech tomahawk toys conversion (Imperial knight proxies)
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Yamato made a 1/60 Prototype of the Monster, but decided there was not enough interest. The next largest model I have seen is the one you uploaded pictures of.
It would have easily been massive enough for a Warlord.
There are bigger destroids than the old Exosquad ones. Yamato made 1/60 versions of both the Tomahawk and the Defender. I've used them both as Knights. The Tomahawk could probably be used as a Warhound. There is someone making 3d printed Tomahawks at something around 1/50-1/55 scale, 10" tall.
The Yamato Tomahawk, about 8.5" tall.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/02 23:12:58
Subject: Battle tech tomahawk toys conversion (Imperial knight proxies)
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
This looks fantastic!
I don't think it looks out of place at all in the 40k world!
Out of place within the cyber-gothic-skull-gilded imperium, perhaps. But certainly right in line with one of the fringe-worlds that might ally with the tau or demiurge. I can easily imagine this kind of technology finding a home in the "argentum corporation" (descended from the auretian technocracy of 30K).
- Adi.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/03 05:09:21
Subject: Re:Battle tech tomahawk toys conversion (Imperial knight proxies)
|
 |
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche
|
Justyn wrote:Yamato made a 1/60 Prototype of the Monster, but decided there was not enough interest. The next largest model I have seen is the one you uploaded pictures of.
It would have easily been massive enough for a Warlord.
This world... this fallen world... it just wasn't ready for such beauty
Back on topic, great great job with the Matchbox version, the chainsaw arm looks fantastic.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/03 18:34:26
Subject: Re:Battle tech tomahawk toys conversion (Imperial knight proxies)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Excellent work, OP. I like it a lot.
|
Proud Purveyor Of The Unconventional In 40k |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/06 00:03:24
Subject: Battle tech tomahawk toys conversion (Imperial knight proxies)
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
I did love robottech/battletech back in the day. I think the MAC II monster was one of my favorites - partly because it was so strange. I think it would work better in 40K than most of the range.
|
|
 |
 |
|