Switch Theme:

Idea to differentiate Farsight enclave from Tau empire  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in kr
Human Auxiliary to the Empire



Seoul, Korea

I absolutely love the concept of farsight enclave, where they are constantly said to put higher importance in CC
than regular Tau empire, but I was so sad to found out that I could not find much of evidence of that CC except for
one Fusion blade per army...
So I was thinking, would it be such a bad Idea for GW to give us something like Battlesuits with lesser version of Fusion blade to go with
Commander for CC? The current 'Eight' is far to heavy of flamer, and has nowhere close to having enough CC :(
   
Made in ca
Longtime Dakkanaut





I want to see the Warscaper drone modeled for them, their new prototype stealth transports mentioned in Warzone: Mont'ka in a throw away line, and some sort of melee unit of battlesuits as you said.


This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/03/05 09:52:00


 
   
Made in us
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps




Phoenix, AZ, USA

Really, the Onager Gauntlet just needs to be a regular system rather than a signature system, and it should use BS instead WS (it's technically a punchgun, after all). I'm okay with it being a 'vre and up option, though.

SJ

“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
 
   
Made in us
Focused Fire Warrior



Rockwood, TN

There are some old fluff references to Commander Brightsword who had some form of CC weapon as well. There are lots of ways to expand some of the suits into have a minimal CC capability, but considering we are just a touch over the top with shooting (arguably only out done by eldar), I don't know if giving every unit a CC weapon of merit is an answer. Maybe if they put something to limit the models shooting capability if they took a CC weapon it might be a little more balanced.
   
Made in us
Abhorrent Grotesque Aberration





How about:

Any number of fire warriors may switch rifle for combat knife: 5 points.



------------------
"Why me?" Gideon begged, falling to his knees.
"Why not?" - Asdrubael Vect 
   
Made in us
Focused Fire Warrior



Rockwood, TN

clively wrote:
How about:

Any number of fire warriors may switch rifle for combat knife: 5 points.




Lol, one CC weapon that doesn't change their profile in attack? Sounds like a GW upgrade
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: