| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/05 09:48:03
Subject: Idea to differentiate Farsight enclave from Tau empire
|
 |
Human Auxiliary to the Empire
Seoul, Korea
|
I absolutely love the concept of farsight enclave, where they are constantly said to put higher importance in CC
than regular Tau empire, but I was so sad to found out that I could not find much of evidence of that CC except for
one Fusion blade per army...
So I was thinking, would it be such a bad Idea for GW to give us something like Battlesuits with lesser version of Fusion blade to go with
Commander for CC? The current 'Eight' is far to heavy of flamer, and has nowhere close to having enough CC :(
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/05 09:51:45
Subject: Idea to differentiate Farsight enclave from Tau empire
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I want to see the Warscaper drone modeled for them, their new prototype stealth transports mentioned in Warzone: Mont'ka in a throw away line, and some sort of melee unit of battlesuits as you said.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/03/05 09:52:00
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/05 16:50:03
Subject: Idea to differentiate Farsight enclave from Tau empire
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
Phoenix, AZ, USA
|
Really, the Onager Gauntlet just needs to be a regular system rather than a signature system, and it should use BS instead WS (it's technically a punchgun, after all). I'm okay with it being a 'vre and up option, though.
SJ
|
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/07 21:45:51
Subject: Idea to differentiate Farsight enclave from Tau empire
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
Rockwood, TN
|
There are some old fluff references to Commander Brightsword who had some form of CC weapon as well. There are lots of ways to expand some of the suits into have a minimal CC capability, but considering we are just a touch over the top with shooting (arguably only out done by eldar), I don't know if giving every unit a CC weapon of merit is an answer. Maybe if they put something to limit the models shooting capability if they took a CC weapon it might be a little more balanced.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/07 22:27:00
Subject: Idea to differentiate Farsight enclave from Tau empire
|
 |
Abhorrent Grotesque Aberration
|
How about:
Any number of fire warriors may switch rifle for combat knife: 5 points.
|
------------------
"Why me?" Gideon begged, falling to his knees.
"Why not?" - Asdrubael Vect |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/07 22:55:57
Subject: Idea to differentiate Farsight enclave from Tau empire
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
Rockwood, TN
|
clively wrote:How about:
Any number of fire warriors may switch rifle for combat knife: 5 points.

Lol, one CC weapon that doesn't change their profile in attack? Sounds like a GW upgrade
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|