Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

which is the better setup, 2 goreaxes or axe and gorefist?
does the possible mortal wound with the gorefist outweigh the reroll from the dual axes?

2 goreaxes = reroll a roll of 1 to hit
gorefist = 1 mortal wound on a roll of a 6 after a successful save

I use both honestly. One unit of each.

They are pretty balanced options overall, but to give some specific advice: If you are going to utilize cover, wizards, or other sources of save bonuses and/or they predominantly face foes without rend then gorefist will be your best bet. If you are running a decent amount of +attack stuff (Bloodsecrator, command abilities, etc) then the double-axes will be a better choice.

yeah, I suppose it is a tricky question. thanks guys.