Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/31 21:09:22
Subject: Are you expeced to use legion specific rules if you want to play a legion.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I am new to 30k so I have no idea how big of an issue this is since 30k appears to be more re-enacting minded than 40k usually is. The Blackshield outsider army fluff is interesting enough for me to consider starting an army, but none of their rules (mainly you can deep strike + some semi useful items) do seem that attractive to me. And them not being able to use generic generic rites of war is really restricting especially since a few of them would really fit the theme that I had in mind and would perfectly fit the whole rogue space pirate feel. Would it be frowned upon to just use the generic legion list, and model them like black shield outsiders ?
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2017/01/31 21:28:40
Inactive, user. New profile might pop up in a while |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/31 21:33:55
Subject: Re:Are you expeced to use legion specific rules if you want to play a legion.
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
I don't believe it's required, but you will find yourself rather restricted with no special characters or units, and very often your units will be outclassed by their equivalents due to the lack of extra special rules.
|
For Khaela Mensha Khaine
For the Emperor and Sanguinius!
DS:90+S++G+++MB--IPw40k15#+D+A+/mWD-R+T(T)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/31 21:38:38
Subject: Re:Are you expeced to use legion specific rules if you want to play a legion.
|
 |
Pragmatic Primus Commanding Cult Forces
|
There's a provision for doing something like that. From "Legion Astartes Special Rules" in the AoD Army List book:
Unlisted Legions: If you are using this army list to represent a Legion which does not yet have its own unique Legiones Astartes rule, you may instead add either the Stubborn or Furious Charge special rule to the standard provisions of this rule in the interim.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/01 00:30:47
Subject: Are you expeced to use legion specific rules if you want to play a legion.
|
 |
Veteran Knight Baron in a Crusader
|
I don't mind if you use non-Legion-specific rules, so long as you aren't using other legion rules. (There was a somewhat heated thread on here about representing Blood Angels with World Eaters rules and I'm personally not with that sort of thing).
|
3000pts Blood Angels (4th Company) - 2000pts Skitarii (Voss Prime) - 2500pts Imperial Knights (Unnamed House) - 1000pts Imperial Guard (Household Retainers)
2000pts Free Peoples (Edlynd Fusiliers) - 2000pts Kharadron Overlords (Barak Zilfin) - 500pts Ironweld Arsenal (Edlynd Ironwork Federation) - 1000pts Duardin (Grongrok Powderheads)
Wargaming's no fun when you have a plan! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/01 09:24:48
Subject: Are you expeced to use legion specific rules if you want to play a legion.
|
 |
Dispassionate Imperial Judge
|
Agree with above.
Using a specific Legion army but just modelling them like Blackshields is pretty fluffy - Blackshield gotta come from somewhere and maybe this Blackshield force were originally, say, Ultramarines, so still use their organisation and tactics.
Call them Renegade Ultramarines so you don't confuse people with the Blackshield tag.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|