Switch Theme:

Dreadmob PDF Missing from FW Downloads Section  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy






Hey folks,

I noticed a few weeks back that the PDF for the Ork Dreadmob Army List had gone missing from the Downloads section of the Forge World website. I've e-mailed them, but was unable to coax out a response (unfortunate; they used to be so much better with this stuff!). I play a lot of ITC events, so I also e-mailed the guys over at Frontline, but replies from them on the subject have been similarly non-existent.

So, finally I thought I'd just bring it up on here and see to what conclusions the Ordz of Dakka might leap on the subject! It is of course impossible to say whether the PDF is being edited/updated and will eventually be replaced in the Downloads section, or whether a new edition of Kastorel-Novem's campaign books and their attendant rules will be released, or who knows what else. For now, all we can tell is A) Imperial Armour Volume 8 has long since gone out of sale on the Forge World website, and B) the Ork Dreadmob Army List PDF has recently disappeared itself.* With this knowledge, what do we do with the Ork characters Zhadsnark and Buzzgob? Would you still allow your opponent to field them in a pick-up, and should they still be allowed in Tournaments and other events?

I'm a die-hard Ork player, and I love Zhadsnark, so I'm personally very worried that Forge World have just unceremoniously squashed two of the best (and one of my favourite) avenues towards producing a moderately competitive Ork list. But, although it's exactly what I'm doing for the time being, I don't really like the idea that I'm going to events right now with models/lists that might not be "legal" in the specific context of the 40k tournament scene. I want to be clear about their status as much as possible.

*It is, of course, still perfectly possible to find the thing with a quick search of the Interwebs.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/03/03 02:45:40


 
Made in us
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy






Did you find that with a Google search? Because I did mention above that you could still find it that way....

Look at the Downloads page on Forgeworld's website. Is there a link through to it under the list for Warhammer 40,000 downloads?

https://www.forgeworld.co.uk/en-GB/Downloads
Made in us
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy






Yeah, that's why I ask; I'm almost annoyed that the couple of responses here amount to a "eh, who cares, it doesn't matter"; if being able to find rules with a google search made them perfectly legitimate for all situations and against all opponents, I'd still be using the old Klan rules and Feral Orks, at the very least. They fit well enough within the current edition's framework, really!

I recall ITC's reasoning for disallowing the Iyanden supplement after it went off the GW site when the new Eldar book was released: simply put, if it wasn't available on a GW website, it wasn't usable.

But of course GW/FW don't care as long as you're buying their products. So it's down to the players, and in the case of ITC, it's down to TO's and the guys making the FAQ at the "top." Locally, they're letting me use it basically as long as ITC hasn't said anything about it. But I don't have much hope in the "long" run.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/03/04 05:05:36


 
Made in us
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy






The broader point being, I think, that even though a Supplement has been updated and re-released, rules which were written in the old edition of the Supplement and left out of the new remain "legal" for use.

Just like you can choose which rules you prefer for your Sisters of Battle, just like you can use Clan Raukaan instead of Angels of Death for your Iron Hands (and initially identical rules for each have even been FAQ'd differently!), just like you can choose your favourite rules for Inquisitors.

But don't you go using Iyanden!

One can no longer reliably take the rulings on any one part of the rules and apply their principle to any other part; there is no system, there are no principles, it's all just ad-hoc, case-by-case, erratic stuff, or no response at all, the main point probably being "just keep buying stuff" (at least when the point is being made by GW).

I like Zhadsnark, and I think, thanks to GW's veritable butchering of the Ork Codex, Buzzgob's Discount Stompa is an important part of keeping the greenskins [even remotely] afloat in the game as it "works" today, but I also don't think just being able to find something via Google Search makes it plainly fine for general use in a pick-up/competitive environment. Either the Dreadmob rules get re-posted to FW's site, or re-released in another fashion, or they really shouldn't remain accessible for use in public events.

All that said, I'm certainly not the one to make that decision, and so until ITC actually bothers to address it, I'm going to keep using my models the way I like. If someone doesn't know what they are, that won't be a really new sensation for my opponent anyway; there's way too much nonsense in this game to keep track of it all regardless.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/03/07 05:12:45


 
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: