Switch Theme:

Auto cannons vs missile launchers  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Dakka Veteran





Which is the better one to spam in a take all comers list?

I have 3 squads of 5 havocs and 4 autocannons each.
I have half a mind to start converting these autocannons into missile launchers using greenstuff.


In the Grimdark future of DerpHammer40k, there are only dank memes! 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





Arashen, Segmentum Pacificus

I'll be sticking with autocannons personally. I'm too lazy to remodel everything at this point

I saw with eyes then young, and this is my testament.
 
   
Made in us
Hardened Veteran Guardsman






Autocannons are generally worse than missile lanchers, with the exception of 1 wound MEQ, but the cheaper price tag on autocannons makes them more cost efficient against things that aren't 3+ save multiwound infantry or vehicles.
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran





I was thinking of spamming frag option. D6 s3 ap -0 1wound.

High rate of fire is just better in my opinion because single wounds spill over in a unit compared to d3 wounding. Even s3 still wounds a t6 and tougher on a 6s.

In the Grimdark future of DerpHammer40k, there are only dank memes! 
   
Made in us
Hardened Veteran Guardsman






Even shooting frag against puny guardsmen, autocannon is more points efficient than a missile launcher, because the extra 5 points only nets you a small increase in wounds done, even accounting for damage not spilling over.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Missile launchers are more multipurpose though, as they can hurt big things autocannons struggle against.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/16 06:07:59


 
   
Made in ru
!!Goffik Rocker!!






Frag is s4.
I think you're better off as a mix.
   
Made in gb
Keeper of the Holy Orb of Antioch





avoiding the lorax on Crion

Missiles are somewhat a multi tool and able to handle a variety of jobs vs specialist weaponry such Las cannons and such.

Thee do not excel at one thing yet can be used vs inf, armour and depending on army fliers' too.


Sgt. Vanden - OOC Hey, that was your doing. I didn't choose to fly in the "Dongerprise'.

"May the odds be ever in your favour"

Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote:
I have no clue how Dakka's moderation work. I expect it involves throwing a lot of d100 and looking at many random tables.

FudgeDumper - It could be that you are just so uncomfortable with the idea of your chapters primarch having his way with a docile tyranid spore cyst, that you must deny they have any feelings at all.  
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran





Are flak missiles free option?

In the Grimdark future of DerpHammer40k, there are only dank memes! 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




 CadianGateTroll wrote:
Are flak missiles free option?


They don't exist anymore since shooting fliers is just a -1 to hit.

In general I like missile launchers for their versatility and the ability to use them for anti-infantry if i need to compared to Las, Autocannons, and Heavy Bolters. To me this versatility is the main strength of Havocs/Devastators/Long Fangs compared to Predators, Centurions, Dakka Dreads, etc.
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran





Is heavy bolter better to spam? Because its only 10pts.

In the Grimdark future of DerpHammer40k, there are only dank memes! 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: