Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 15:27:35
Subject: Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Krazed Killa Kan
|
So, in the chapter approved book, it seems that there's going to be something for open play regarding vehicle construction rules:
"We are also bringing a whole new feature to Open Play. Designing and building your own vehicles is a feature that hasn’t appeared in Warhammer 40,000 since 5th Edition. We are going to trial some new rules to allow you to design your very own Land Raider variants and field these behemoths on the battlefields of the 41st Millennium."
I started playing about the end of 5th, and I don't recall what these rules were or how they worked. Does anyone recall how they were used and/or have thoughts on how they could be implemented into 8th?
It is of particular interest to me because I've probably got around 9 or so looted vehicles which no longer have any kind of rules, so it would be interesting to find a way to field them once again. Though, I honestly think that is a bit optimistic. Still, I hope it's going to be more interesting than just 'different ways to bring land raiders'.
|
"Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment." Words to live by. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 15:32:06
Subject: Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
To me this just screams ORKS so I'm wondering why they chose Land Raiders and not something else.
It sounds awesome though
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 15:34:43
Subject: Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Krazed Killa Kan
|
Qlanth wrote:To me this just screams ORKS so I'm wondering why they chose Land Raiders and not something else.
Because SPESS MERRENZ get all the good toyz first.
Still, curious to see what will come of it. Hope it's more than 'glue more guns to a land raider and have it be a legal model'.
|
"Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment." Words to live by. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 15:48:58
Subject: Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Hopefully it's as good as the old rules. Anyone remember the Deodorant tank?
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 16:02:57
Subject: Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel
|
My thought is since its for open and not matched play I don't care.
|
warhammer 40k mmo. If I can drive an ork trukk into the back of a space marine dread and explode in a fireball of epic, I can die happy!
8k points
3k points
3k points
Admech 2.5k points
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 16:10:03
Subject: Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Yes, these rules I believe refer to looted ork vehicles, usually a lesser, more ramshackle version of any vehicle they've managed to get their hands on.
|
I've been playing a while, my first model was a lead marine and my first White Dwarf was bound with staples |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 16:10:46
Subject: Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
They going to use this so that if they don't republish rules or discontinue models, you will still have the option of using them the way you intended to. Aka: this is how you build a Looted Wagon.
|
Galef wrote:If you refuse to use rock, you will never beat scissors. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 16:23:33
Subject: Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
Orock wrote:My thought is since its for open and not matched play I don't care.
Given it's open play, they may be using it as a test run.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 16:27:49
Subject: Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Battleship Captain
|
I don't think it'll be anything amazing. It'll just be like the old carnifex rules where you had like 18 weapons and upgrades and you get to bolt on whatever you want.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 16:29:24
Subject: Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Truly glorious times they were.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 16:46:16
Subject: Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Stubborn Prosecutor
|
I suspect this will be the weapon swap rules we have now with some additional pieces of equipment to affect the stat line. +X points for a faster engine that's more likely to explode, +X points for an additional armor package, etc.
|
Bender wrote:* Realise that despite the way people talk, this is not a professional sport played by demi gods, but rather a game of toy soldiers played by tired, inebriated human beings.
https://www.victorwardbooks.com/ Home of Dark Days series |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 17:23:31
Subject: Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Member of a Lodge? I Can't Say
|
I hope they extend it to all vehicles. I'd love to make a LR punisher with a hull mounted punisher Gatling cannon and sponson punisher Gatling cannons.
|
“Because we couldn’t be trusted. The Emperor needed a weapon that would never obey its own desires before those of the Imperium. He needed a weapon that would never bite the hand that feeds. The World Eaters were not that weapon. We’ve all drawn blades purely for the sake of shedding blood, and we’ve all felt the exultation of winning a war that never even needed to happen. We are not the tame, reliable pets that the Emperor wanted. The Wolves obey, when we would not. The Wolves can be trusted, when we never could. They have a discipline we lack, because their passions are not aflame with the Butcher’s Nails buzzing in the back of their skulls.
The Wolves will always come to heel when called. In that regard, it is a mystery why they name themselves wolves. They are tame, collared by the Emperor, obeying his every whim. But a wolf doesn’t behave that way. Only a dog does.
That is why we are the Eaters of Worlds, and the War Hounds no longer."
– Eighth Captain, Khârn |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 17:40:34
Subject: Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Ultramarine Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
The vdr rules were super fun, and could be super abused. Thats for both 3-5th edition versions, and the "weapon swap" rules in 2nd. But I've got nothing against them, like I said, super fun!
Why just Land Raiders though... hopefully that changes soon.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 22:18:43
Subject: Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
Between Alpha and Omega, and a little to the left
|
Hopefully it's not just land raiders and it's just an example. And expecially I hope that if they hammer these rules out that'll result in looted wagons rules for Orks. It's a major pipe dream but good lord that would be amazing.
On the other hand, it would not surprise me if it ends up getting used for land raiders with no weapons
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 22:44:54
Subject: Re:Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Gonna toot my own horn and throw out my vehicle and monstrous creature design rules linked in my signature for 7th edition.
I have sent them every iteration, and showed them the feedback I got. I hope that in some small way helped drive them to make an official version now.
I've been putting the math down recently, so it will be interesting to see if it lines up. (It will also be nice not to have to go through every weapon in the game again and try to extrapolate points...)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/08/31 22:45:35
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/08/31 22:56:03
Subject: Thoughts and wild speculations on vehicle construction rules
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Time for the Landraider Hades. Acheron flame cannon On the turret, 2 sponson mounted Avenger Megabolters.
|
|
 |
 |
|