| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2017/10/24 16:16:33
Subject: Yarrick and Multiple Wounds
|
|
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
Yarrick's Iron Will ability states:
"Roll a d6 each time Yarrick loses his final wound; on a roll of 3+ that wound is not lost."
Let's say Yarrick is down to his last wound and he's hit by a Lascannon which inflicts 3 wounds to him.
Does he have to roll Iron Will once or three times?
|
 blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
 the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
 Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
 Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
 insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
|
|
|
 |
|
2017/10/24 16:32:00
Subject: Yarrick and Multiple Wounds
|
|
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
There's already a thread on this if you search.
|
 Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
|
|
|
|
|
2017/10/24 16:32:50
Subject: Yarrick and Multiple Wounds
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
He has to roll 3 times. Yarrick's last wound is taken away by damage, not by an incoming wound (since you're not dealing with a mortal wound here). This means there's 3 damage coming in. Assuming he hasn't saved against any of these, he'd have to roll Iron Will against each point of damage in order to keep it from taking away his last wound.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/10/24 16:37:52
Subject: Yarrick and Multiple Wounds
|
|
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
 doctortom wrote:He has to roll 3 times. Yarrick's last wound is taken away by damage, not by an incoming wound (since you're not dealing with a mortal wound here). This means there's 3 damage coming in. Assuming he hasn't saved against any of these, he'd have to roll Iron Will against each point of damage in order to keep it from taking away his last wound.
Okay, thanks.
On the shelf he stays.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/10/24 17:22:22
Subject: Yarrick and Multiple Wounds
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Once he takes the wound. The wounds drop. Doesn't matter if he died from a shadowsword. On a single 3+ he comes up.
How I read it, how I played it.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/10/24 17:25:15
Subject: Yarrick and Multiple Wounds
|
|
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
 rhinoceraids wrote:Once he takes the wound. The wounds drop. Doesn't matter if he died from a shadowsword. On a single 3+ he comes up.
How I read it, how I played it.
I was swayed by the last thread to think this way.
Here's the other thread: https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/741435.page#9642803
No need to repeat it!
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/10/24 17:25:52
Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
