DARK ANGELS - Watchers in the Dark, Armorium Cherubs

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**lindsay40k**

Do they take up transport space?

**BaconCatBug**

lindsay40k wrote:
Do they take up transport space?

https://whc-cdn.games-workshop.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Warhammer_40000_Stepping_into_a_New_Edition_of_Warhammer_40000.pdf wrote:Q: Do models with profiles, such as Armorium Cherubs and Ammo Runts, count as a model for the purposes of embarking within transports or when measuring ranges to and from the unit?
A: Yes – for all rules purposes they are part of the unit.

Because the Watcher in the Dark that carries Azrael's Lion Helm does not have a profile, it doesn't take up a transport slot. However Armorium Cherubs do have a profile, so do take up a transport slot.

**lindsay40k**

Aha. I don’t see a Watcher profile in my Codex. So, I guess they don’t take up space in a land raider?

**BaconCatBug**

lindsay40k wrote:
Aha. I don’t see a Watcher profile in my Codex. So, I guess they don’t take up space in a land raider?

They do not.

**lindsay40k**

Thanks!

**Stux**

The Watcher model essentially doesn't exist as a model in the game for all rules purposes.