Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2019/11/24 18:18:32
Subject: When negative feelings for a model threatens to bubble up to the surface
Slayer-Fan123 wrote: How do ANY of the four models you listed look like Fisher Price toys? That's just blatant refusal for change in an army's lineup plain and simple.
Yes, because the Dinobot models and Taurox are universally loved models... /s
Dinobot models look far too cartoony and the Taurox looks worse than whatever Tesla put out recently with it's cat tracks. Every single conversion I have seen of the above models is superior to the base one in every way.
There is a reason those models are generally abhorred, and it is not for their rules.
They're no more cartoony than the regular washing machine Dread or Wave Serpent of all things.
It's the same thing that happened with the Centurions and eventually even Intercessors of all things. People hate new units coming out of nowhere and therefore they hate on design even though the design really doesn't have a flaw.
Can you really say, with a straight face, that these:
Spoiler:
Is somehow more cartoony than:
Spoiler:
If you're honest with yourself, the answer is no. Hell that's just off the top of my head for three models too. If you looked you would probably find way worse in the Eldar or Tyranid lines.
Yes.
Oh and I notice you missed the tonka turox off your list.
