Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/11 21:23:46
Subject: Sm question: Do I lose the super doctrine if I soup up with a successor chapter?
|
 |
Raging-on-the-Inside Blood Angel Sergeant
|
Like the title says?
Does my BA detachment lose the +1 attack in assault doctrine if my list also has a BA successor chapter detachment?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/11 22:19:00
Subject: Sm question: Do I lose the super doctrine if I soup up with a successor chapter?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
I think so. The phrasing in the rulebook is that you get Savage Echoes "...so long as every unit from your army (with the exception of those that are UNALIGNED) is a BLOOD ANGELS unit or every unit from your army is from the same Blood Angels successor Chapter."
Either/or. Not both.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/12 04:50:27
Subject: Sm question: Do I lose the super doctrine if I soup up with a successor chapter?
|
 |
Raging-on-the-Inside Blood Angel Sergeant
|
That's bad.
Even if the successor chooses the CT from the parent chapter?
I can't combine differently painted together. My primaris are painted as successor chapter... And old marines traditionally.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/12 05:45:09
Subject: Sm question: Do I lose the super doctrine if I soup up with a successor chapter?
|
 |
Captain of the Forlorn Hope
|
Xirax wrote:That's bad.
Even if the successor chooses the CT from the parent chapter?
I can't combine differently painted together. My primaris are painted as successor chapter... And old marines traditionally.
Paint does not matter.
As long as they are all from the same chapter, you are good to go.
|
"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.
I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!
We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/12 05:58:35
Subject: Sm question: Do I lose the super doctrine if I soup up with a successor chapter?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
You can use your blood angels painted army to represent Iron Hands or Imperial Fists if you like.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/12 06:29:24
Subject: Sm question: Do I lose the super doctrine if I soup up with a successor chapter?
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
You can use your models just fine, paint does not matter, as long as you're picking the same keyword for all units.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/12 06:37:03
Subject: Sm question: Do I lose the super doctrine if I soup up with a successor chapter?
|
 |
Raging-on-the-Inside Blood Angel Sergeant
|
I want to use my black armoured primaris (IH/RG usually) "Angels Pentinent" models to have a fluffy reason to be in black armour.
Angels pentinent is the only "blackish" BA faction. Normally death company is the only black armoured BA.
So even in a tournament I could have mixed colours if I say they are from the same sub faction? Only chapter insignia I've ever used on my minis are from BA chapter so I my blue/black models have no chapter specific insignia. Casual games for sure, but also in tournament scene?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/12 07:20:40
Subject: Sm question: Do I lose the super doctrine if I soup up with a successor chapter?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Yep. Paint does not matter. As long as your roster says they're all BA and you tell your opponent that the entire army is BA, then you're fine.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/12 14:40:56
Subject: Re:Sm question: Do I lose the super doctrine if I soup up with a successor chapter?
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Note that there are some places (e.g., Warhammer World) where how a model is painted does matter, so if in doubt make sure to ask your opponent or tournament organizer.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/12 14:41:27
Subject: Sm question: Do I lose the super doctrine if I soup up with a successor chapter?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
You'll have to check with the specific tournament organizers to see if it's okay for their tournament, some might put on additional restrictions beyond what's in the rules.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/15 14:04:44
Subject: Sm question: Do I lose the super doctrine if I soup up with a successor chapter?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Xirax wrote:I want to use my black armoured primaris ( IH/ RG usually) "Angels Pentinent" models to have a fluffy reason to be in black armour.
Or you know, just say it's night fighting camo? How is that an issue?
If only Blood Angels followed some sort of book, book with whole chapter on various camouflage patterns...
[as seen here with black painted Raptors with low-visibility markings instead of usual stark white]
|
|
 |
 |
|