White Dwarf Reviews?

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Lord Damocles**

Wait, they went back to including the ussue numbers?

If I still cared about White Dwarf, this would change everything!
What's next, the conclusion to the Battle of Tanrak series..?

**Lord Damocles**

oni wrote:
WD is the worst its ever been.

If you play W40K, AoS and 1 to 2 specialist games, you'll love it.

If you play only one game, it's a complete waste of time, effort.and money.

For example, I'm interested in only W40K and hobby related articles. About 18% of the total content in WD #450 is relevant to my interests. That's a pathetically low % for a $10.00 USD magazine.

This has been the case for quite some time as they try to pack more and more different game content and sadly, rules, into the magazine.

It simply no longer has any real value.

What do you propose as a solution, exactly? - that White Dwarf should skew heavily (ie. exclusively) towards a single system per issue? Doesn't that just exagerate the problem for everybody who isn't you?

**Lord Damocles**

angryboy2k wrote:
Does anyone still post written reviews of White Dwarf on a forum, blog or other written format?
The only review I can find for issue 450 is a video and I don't have inclination or ability to watch a video over my lunch at work.

Here you go