Switch Theme:

Why are autoguns portrayed as junk weapons  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Rampagin' Boarboy





United Kingdom

I've always known it to be that Lasguns are the preferred weapon over autoguns due to logistics.

Instead of shipping a trillion magazines of hard ammunition a few times a day for your rank and file, you can ship a trillion rechargeable Lasgun magazines a few times a week.

So you're shipping less weight, less often and can still keep your grunts stocked up on ammo.

Also there's minimal moving parts, if any, in a Lasgun, and the fewer moving parts there are the less likely it is to outright break or fail in the field. You only really have to keep a Lasgun clean rather than clean, and oiled, and everything else that goes on with modern firearms care.

It's also far easier to train a soldier to use a gun that has minimal recoil, isn't affected by wind or gravity, and only needs cleaning.
Made in gb
Rampagin' Boarboy





United Kingdom

Yeah, bolters are for breaking open a target with a single shot and making sure everyone around them knows about it.

It's a shock and awe type weapon for a shock and awe type soldier.
 
Forum Index » 40K Background
Go to: