| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2006/07/09 09:15:18
Subject: Schaffers Inquisitorial Planetary Defence Force. Legal?
|
|
Fresh-Faced New User
|
This army I'm toying with is not good. I dont even think it has the potential to ever work, but its fun. I use Schaffer and his band as the HQ, all of my Necromunda gangs as Hive Militia troops, and a Inquisitor with his retinue, and assorted assasins, and a bunch of big IG tanks.
My question is: Does Schaffer count as an ally and can he lead a Defence force?
|
? |
|
|
 |
|
2006/07/09 09:34:32
Subject: RE: Schaffers Inquisitorial Planetary Defence Force. Legal?
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
You're talking about the PDF list from Codex: Armageddon, right? The one that's no longer legal since the iG 'dex was released?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006/07/09 09:36:30
Subject: RE: Schaffers Inquisitorial Planetary Defence Force. Legal?
|
|
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Codex Armageddon, yes. It also has KOS too. Speed Freaks are illegal now?
|
? |
|
|
|
|
2006/07/09 09:38:16
Subject: RE: Schaffers Inquisitorial Planetary Defence Force. Legal?
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
No, because there's not been a new Ork codex released.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
|
2006/07/09 12:55:15
Subject: RE: Schaffers Inquisitorial Planetary Defence Force. Legal?
|
|
Fresh-Faced New User
|
help me out. I cannot see where it is stated that the armageddon codex is out. GW site is near dead right now in UK and US and its taking hours to load pages. It seems all links to armageddon are deleted and the FAQ does'nt mention the PD force....
|
? |
|
|
|
|
2006/07/09 13:11:27
Subject: RE: Schaffers Inquisitorial Planetary Defence Force. Legal?
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
They're dead because the codices they were based on have been revised. Only the Speed Freeks list is still valid because the codex it was based on is still valid. The PDF is not valid because it was based on the old Codex Imperial Guard which is also no longer valid.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
|
2006/07/09 14:09:02
Subject: RE: Schaffers Inquisitorial Planetary Defence Force. Legal?
|
|
The Hammer of Witches
A new day, a new time zone.
|
There are however, rules for using Schaeffer and Last Chancers in the new IG codex.
|
"-Nonsense, the Inquisitor and his retinue are our hounoured guests, of course we should invite them to celebrate Four-armed Emperor-day with us..."
Thought for the Day - Never use the powerfist hand to wipe. |
|
|
|
|
2006/07/09 15:17:11
Subject: RE: Schaffers Inquisitorial Planetary Defence Force. Legal?
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
No one said that there wasn't. It's the PDF that's illegal.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
|
2006/07/10 05:06:57
Subject: RE: Schaffers Inquisitorial Planetary Defence Force. Legal?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
Standing outside Jester's house demanding the things he took from my underwear drawer.
|
Posted By Ghaz on 07/09/2006 6:11 PM
They're dead because the codices they were based on have been revised. Only the Speed Freeks list is still valid because the codex it was based on is still valid.
Technically, doesn't this statement mean that the SW, DA, and BA supplemental codexes are dead? I've been using the Wolves codex in 4th ed. with the current marine codex and the FAQ. Just curious to see if I need to change to doctrined marines.
|
I've seen the Reaper Exarch with both weapon options and both look like things you can buy in sex shops. A weapon should not look like this, not even a Emperor's Children weapon. -Symbio Joe |
|
|
|
|
2006/07/10 05:18:11
Subject: RE: Schaffers Inquisitorial Planetary Defence Force. Legal?
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
Posted by ironkodiak on 07/10/2006 11:06 AM
Technically, doesn't this statement mean that the SW, DA, and BA supplemental codexes are dead? I've been using the Wolves codex in 4th ed. with the current marine codex and the FAQ. Just curious to see if I need to change to doctrined marines.
No, because GW has stated that they're still usable. Where have they done so for the PDF list?
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
