Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

sorry, coundlt realy resist that 1....

and more to the point you can take this as a rights argument, someone takes away your rights to lets say were all in america and they ban the use of all guns excapt things over lets say air pistols, with no excaptions. you would moan and complaign wouldnt you. just cos there isnt a ban doesnt mean you need to go out and buy a crazy gun or two...

i know that seems a bit rampley and disjointed, but thats the way my doors hindged(YES my spelling is bad... anyone got a good spellchecker addon for firefox?)

What?

thought so, read it like 8 times you may understand it then....

(if you hadnt noticed its an owl.... and there was a comment about angery owls, im just SLOW at getting my point across....)

IRPurple wrote:thought so, read it like 8 times you may understand it then....

(if you hadnt noticed its an owl.... and there was a comment about angery owls, im just SLOW at getting my point across....)

Thanks, I got that.

I couldn't understand the text after that. Are you saying we shouldn't take people's rights away, or that we should be more respectful with the rights we have, or what. If you could clarify that, that would be great....

I think Firefox 3 has a built in spellchecker, actually. That's what I use.

more taking away rights, but then again both can technicaly be applyed. but if i remember the OP says nothing will happen as of yet so nothing to worry about,

im guesin its in toold or something... but then again i havent looked perticularly hard.......

Polonius wrote:

ShumaGorath wrote:You're just an angry owl.

Fair enough. I don't come to Dakka to see wacky non-GW related images. I'm also neither angry, nor an owl. Owls, particularly the Little Owl of Athena, are symbols of wisdom.

(thx for teeing it high and soft!)
____

IRpurple - please give context for the reply, otherwise it just looks random. kthxbai.

Too bad you're the second person to make that joke.

Yeah, but it makes no sense without the setup...

It's just a punchline without context.

It's just a punchline without context.

So are we putting pictures in sigs or what.

It seems to be a yes-no thing. You are free to put a picture in your sig but your peers may say otherwise.

As expected, Shuma has the biggest and most obnoxious animated GIF to put things to an end.

Thanks, Shuma.

@Taco: pull the spaces so it does the mouseover:

DC:70-S++G+++M-B++I+Pw40k03#-D++A++/eWD278R+++T(T)DM++

As expected, Shuma has the biggest and most obnoxious animated GIF to put things to an end.

Thanks, Shuma.

Any time.

I think you should just limit the sig sizes, and cut it off after x number of lines. let people have pics, just not huge annoying ones.

edit: also the whole demon adoptable thing would kinda cease to continue if you ended pics. They arent that large and the whole point is for people to click on them, IMO

oni wrote:Ideally all non GW related sigs should be expunged...

While GW content is predominant on this site this is a wargaming forum, not an exclusive GW forum.

oni wrote:Ideally all non GW related sigs should be expunged

Precisely WHY should that happen?

Eric

Waiting for answer to above question.

The followup thread to this one is now up with more detailed voting. Thanks for voting and opining here to all that did. I'll lock this thread now since it is replaced by the other one.