Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

The poisoned 5+ only works if they wouldn't normally wound on better this would make them more effective against toughness six or better meaning you don't have to worry so much about your destroyers going down to a stray shot.

The base rules for poision are: If you would wound on the same roll or better, re-roll to wound instead. (although I actualy forgot that part when I first wrote it). I just don't think there's enough toughness 6 out there to make a rule that's specifily tailered to them.

Using my idea gives the warriors a special weapon equivalent against MC's and tanks. Against MC's they don't wound as well as a special weapon, but wound more often then they would normally, and against a tank they now have a good chance of killing it in one turn if enough hits can be scored.

A base squad of 10 guys will get 14 hits in Rapid Fire range. Tha'd be a Str 10, +2 table hit, with plenty of extra hits left over. That's more then some ability to deal with heavy tanks, thats superior to most anti-armor units.

That would be excellent, they'd still fold like a house of cards to shooting and it would force players to move vehicles carefully around them. Hell it might even force a meta change to deal with them.

It would make vehicles entirely useless against them. Particularly if combined with Immortals or Shroud of Night, Any vehicle against them would be a waste of points. 5 Imortals would hit like a rail-gun from 24", if not better.

....

[quote=Vladsimpaler

halo3uber wrote:Do explain, what's Yarrick's ability? In all seriousness (not really) C'Tan don't need a price drop, but Deep Strike would be nice, and Necrons need some form of DS beacon, other than the 'Lith. I mean, the C'Tan are freaking gods, why are they so fething slow? The Nightbringer takes forever to get into assault.

Um, i hate to break it to you, but... the c'tan are definately being moved to apoc only when the new 'dex comes out. I know, it's so sad isn't it !

That's just another rumor for now...

1. Make Flayed One's troops, they are just close combat warriors anyways and they really need the variety. Let them have either fleet or the ability to assault after deep striking (obviously not both)

2. Putting Pariahs in terminator armor is brilliant seeing as it stands the only way to move them up the board is to walk them anyways.

3. Keep "we'll be back" the same with the exception of making it happen right after armor saves (this helps balance it as models may need to take more than one we'll be back roll in a turn). It's not a complicated rule and really makes the Necrons them, it's not broke dont fix it.

4. Make disruption fields an extra few points per model and make it rending.

5. Leave the monolith alone but make it cost a little more maybe 245-250.

6. Give Destroyers 2 wounds.

7. Let Wraiths count as having power weapons.

8. Phase out should go.