Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Gwar! wrote:What annoys me is GWs oh so unsubtle "BUY NEW SHINEY MODELS!" approach to writing rules. i.e. Carnifex which nid players had 6 of now such, but Tervigons and other new models are OMFG WTF HAXX EPIC!

Except Pyrovores, which suck hard.

agnosto wrote:All I know is that I want the same guy that wrote the tryanid 'dex to write the next tau one.

Are you sure? Wouldn't you rather have a Codex you could use from release day with no problems?

Magical Mawloc avoidance movers wrote:I can go anywhere after I get Mawloc-ed!

You'd be moved by the Tyranid player. There's no change in syntax that alters who resolves the Terror From the Deep text.

I do not firmly believe that the way I have been proposing is the only or right way to do things but I do firmly believe that arguing it the other way, very strongly and definitely, is wrong for the same reason.

If all of the posters here can come to an agreement that avoiding means exactly what you have suggested and could never mean anything else then cool. If you also want to agree that the word move (which could have actually just been a verb which works fine given the context and the extra instructions given in the rules) exactly follows the rules for moving in the movement phase (whilst not being an actual term, its just similar to the rules from p.11, so that works) then fine.

I disagree with that premise. No need to flame. Please refer to rule no.1. Also, there is no need to reply to this as I haven't contested any of your claims nor have I put anything new forward. Just trying to address some previous misunderstandings. Any new insight is welcome.

Razerous wrote:Any new insight is welcome.

Agreed.


new insight.

very much welcome

I've always wanted to spark off a random picture posting, for whatever reason. Now, I feel one with myself!

Random Pictures?

Cannerus_The_Unbearable wrote:Random Pictures?

As you wish!

oh oh can I join in

We said "random pictures," not self portrait eh, eh?

Sorry, my brother is a big rolling stones fan