Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

And here we are at the crux of it. It hinges on whether the Mawloc can start it's DS under enemy units deliberately.

My take is that RAW it can't (must put model on board to begin DS, can't put model on enemy model) but RAI it's supposed to. Thus, the FAQ will probably be in the Mawloc's favor.

My problem is that I want to like the Mawloc. It's the tremors beastie. Totally cool for Nids. If it just did the AP 2 s6 blast template and then shoved things out of the way it'd be a cool beastie. I totally dig the Nid version of arty being landsharks, seems just about right. The telefrag tomfoolery ruins what could be a really cool gribbly.

This has turned into a Rules Debate. I'm going to lock this thread to keep it going even more off-topic (sorry 40kenthusiast, this isn't directed at you).