Switch Theme:

Focused Rumination and bound spells?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
[DCM]
Dankhold Troggoth






Shadeglass Maze

Or, if the reasoning for excluding FR is that the item casts the spell (rather than that the extra dice is a casting modifier), you can exclude FR but allow those other situations...
   
Made in us
Hunter with Harpoon Laucher




Castle Clarkenstein

Killjoy00 wrote:It's not a game. I'm legitimate interested (and almost started a new thread). How would you Make Da Call on Focused Rumination and "Not Enough Power"?


Go start a new thread to address that question then.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Arion wrote:Not to mention you must now keep all Power Dice gained in unconventional ways from being used on bound Items i.e. Standard of Sorcery, Master of the Black Arts et al. If you don't want to play our "game" that's fine, but they are legitimate questions. you can't have it not count for bound Items, but still count to modify the score of a 1 or a 2 on the "natural" die. You also can't let those other items that give you power dice work when casting bound spells, because that is the same thing. You have to go all or nothing, you can't pick and choose.


The game I was referring to was being led down a series of questions so you can then draw some semi-logical conclusion you want to set up. It's a method of winning an arguement if the other party is congenial enough to let you control the conversation.


As to the above "you must" "you can't" and "you have to". BS. If you think they are legitimate questions, go start a thread on those topics, discuss it, and prove those points to peoples satisfactions. Linking several things together with the 'all or nothing' assumption is also not a game I feel like playing.

On the original topic, it's pretty much done, with some people going one way, some going others, and a few in the middle who are going to try and argue until everyone agrees with them.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
RiTides wrote:Or, if the reasoning for excluding FR is that the item casts the spell (rather than that the extra dice is a casting modifier), you can exclude FR but allow those other situations...


+1, and the reason I'll be going with no FR for bound items at our upcoming GT and tournaments. The other situations will get looked at independent of some linking to FR.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2010/10/13 02:21:52


....and lo!.....The Age of Sigmar came to an end when Saint Veetock and his hamster legions smote the false Sigmar and destroyed the bubbleverse and lead the true believers back to the Old World.
 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Ok new thread done.

Your attitude here is really quite amazing. No one is trying to lead you down any roads or feed you "BS." I have no idea why you are acting so defensively.

It was a legitimate question that does have relevance to this rules thread, but is in no way an attack. I had messaged RiTides independently when it first came up because I was interested. Since you brought it up again, I thought I'd ask. Sorry your panties are in a twist.
   
 
Forum Index » The Old World & Legacy Warhammer Fantasy Discussion
Go to: