Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/20 23:39:08
Subject: Re:what 40k models need re-doing the most
|
 |
Wing Commander
|
Blacksails wrote: Bobthehero wrote: Blacksails wrote:
On topic, the IG stormtrooper models are pretty awful. The Kasrkin are pretty good, but the basic stormtrooper metal model just looks awful.
Take. That. Back.
They only need a plastic kit.
You think this
is a good sculpt? I mean, even just compared to the Kasrkin, I can't find a reason to ever buy them.
But I will not retract my statement!
Okay, but we can all agree the Rough Rider model needs some serious updating in the IG range.
The open faced models are quite horrible, the closed mask ones though I love. They could use some tweaks, but overall I still think they're some of GW's better models. Remove a few grenades, the bandoleers, and a few other minor tweaks and you have a winner.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/20 23:59:47
Subject: Re:what 40k models need re-doing the most
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Awful cast quality, at least in the boxes i had. About 50% had some serious ( and for me completely unaceptable) flaws, ecspecialy on the leg armour.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 04:14:20
Subject: Re:what 40k models need re-doing the most
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
I like them hellguns. : D
They look like they could do some damage.
I'm not sure why they put the co-axial laspistols- I mean, targeters, on the far side of the gun instead of on top.
Maybe so they could actually be seen, unlike my Sororitas' bolter-scopes which are on the side of the bolter facing the Sister herself.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/11/21 04:17:05
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 10:44:31
Subject: Re:what 40k models need re-doing the most
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Blood Angel Sanguinary Priest - they are supposed to have Blood Chalices according to the codex, but only Corbulo has one. Plus it would be nice to have a box set of 3 with some of the options they can take, instead of a single model with no options.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/11/21 10:45:00
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 13:32:12
Subject: Re:what 40k models need re-doing the most
|
 |
Servoarm Flailing Magos
|
And it's still effin boss!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 13:41:45
Subject: Re:what 40k models need re-doing the most
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
Random rant on guard models and I would like to see them re-done. Catachans and cadians are "cut" differently at the waist. To mix the top and bottom halves, you either end up with no belt and looking funny or 2 belts and looking funny.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 15:55:21
Subject: Re:what 40k models need re-doing the most
|
 |
Wise Ethereal with Bodyguard
Catskills in NYS
|
Pouncey wrote:I like them hellguns. : D
They look like they could do some damage.
I'm not sure why they put the co-axial laspistols- I mean, targeters, on the far side of the gun instead of on top.
Maybe so they could actually be seen, unlike my Sororitas' bolter-scopes which are on the side of the bolter facing the Sister herself.
Co-axial lasgun. Also known as a laser sight.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/11/21 16:03:59
Homosexuality is the #1 cause of gay marriage.
kronk wrote:Every pizza is a personal sized pizza if you try hard enough and believe in yourself.
sebster wrote:Yes, indeed. What a terrible piece of cultural imperialism it is for me to say that a country shouldn't murder its own citizens BaronIveagh wrote:Basically they went from a carrot and stick to a smaller carrot and flanged mace. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 15:58:56
Subject: what 40k models need re-doing the most
|
 |
Monster-Slaying Daemonhunter
Grand Rapids Metro
|
Phoenix Lords...and desperately so.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 17:35:33
Subject: Re:what 40k models need re-doing the most
|
 |
Jovial Plaguebearer of Nurgle
|
Azreal and Ezekiel need to be updated. GW, how are you going to release the new Dark Angels and not include the Grandmaster? Plus, I do not like the Ezekiel model....
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 00:09:23
Subject: Re:what 40k models need re-doing the most
|
 |
Irked Necron Immortal
gravesend kent
|
I think necron scarabs could use a new model aswell
|
6th ed w/l/d
=3000pts 39/19/2
The Mavelance Dynasty=4000pts 28/42/6
short stories:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/558468.page
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/558967.page#6170866
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/559971.page |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 06:38:40
Subject: what 40k models need re-doing the most
|
 |
Esteemed Veteran Space Marine
My secret fortress at the base of the volcano!
|
SOB, because without new models, GW can use the excuse that the existing molds wore out to discontinue the army.
Eldar Exarchs and jetbikes and HOW DID GW NOT ALREADY DO THIS? They just got a shiny new codex a few months back, with a stonking great new big plastic centerpiece model, and Eldar players still have to make due with static-posed SCs that have hats bigger than a Space Marine's entire body?
I'm not even an Eldar player and I'm honked off at this.
Hey, Geedubs... instead of wasting time making conceptually goofy sculpts like Mr. Space Marine Inside a Space Marine (Marineception?) how about re-sculpting some of the absolute dogs in your Special Character line? Or some of these models that are older than many of your players? Don't worry about us Marine players... we will manage without Centurions somehow.
|
Emperor's Eagles (undergoing Chapter reorganization)
Caledonian 95th (undergoing regimental reorganization)
Thousands Sons (undergoing Warband re--- wait, are any of my 40K armies playable?) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 22:27:28
Subject: Re:what 40k models need re-doing the most
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
West Michigan, deep in Whitebread, USA
|
As a 15+ year veteran, I honestly can't wrap my head around how GW can update all sorts of models but leaves the 2nd ed Eldar Jetbikes alone. My god, just recut the sprue similar to like they did with the Space Marine Bikes. Keep the exact same jetbike chassis, but add a rider that looks like a modern Guardian. I did that conversion to all of mine using the original legs and arms, and I think they look absolutely great.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/11/22 22:27:57
"By this point I'm convinced 100% that every single race in the 40k universe have somehow tapped into the ork ability to just have their tech work because they think it should." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/23 00:09:11
Subject: what 40k models need re-doing the most
|
 |
Wing Commander
|
Really how long are the elfdar going to go without getting the fundamentals rebuilt? I think the rise of the plastic aspects will concur with the ability to take more of them as troops choices.
Also, Mephiston.
|
Abadabadoobaddon wrote:Phoenix wrote:Well I don't think the battle company would do much to bolster the ranks of my eldar army  so no.
Nonsense. The Battle Company box is perfect for filling out your ranks of aspect warriors with a large contingent from the Screaming Baldies shrine.
|
|
 |
 |
|