Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 Medium of Death wrote:
Perhaps a bad example.

Cultural achievements are a bit of a better measure.

Compare an Amazonian tribe with one of the greater South American empires for example.

There are some reliable ways to compare this sort of thing, and some not so good. (ie. a culture that has mastered stonework is more advanced than one that builds using clay)
It works to compare how technologically advanced a culture is, but not necessarily the morality of either culture. (The British Empire had better technology than the Zulu, but could one say that the way the British treated the peoples of Africa was moral?)
Such cultural issues are far from black-and-white, and I don't very much enjoy debating issues pertaining to them for that reason.

 Medium of Death wrote:
Perhaps a bad example.

Cultural achievements are a bit of a better measure.

Compare an Amazonian tribe with one of the greater South American empires for example.

That sounds like a pretty terrible metric, actually.

 Medium of Death wrote:

 Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote:

 Medium of Death wrote:
Cultures are measurably different though. You can definitely say that some are inferior to others.

As an example, a culture which regards women as second class or of lower worth would be an example of an inferior culture to a lot of people living in the UK.

That is not how cultures work.

Are you trying to say that all cultures are of equal worth?

What I am saying is that how women are viewed, while a very important issue, is absolutely not constitutive of a culture's essence. What I am saying is that English culture did consider women as second class citizen and then English culture did consider them full citizen with the same rights as other citizen and yet it was still English culture.

 Hordini wrote:

That sounds like a pretty terrible metric, actually.

Depends on if your idea of achievement is cutting out the hearts of slaves and prisoners while they're still alive, I guess.