Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/07 12:10:09
Subject: Air defence
|
 |
Death-Dealing Devastator
Downingtown Pa West of Phili Pa
|
I was at a game last night and the opposing player had 3 Stormtalons. When they moved they were impossible to hit. I wanted to get a good AAA option for my Marines. It seems that the only 6th BRB options are attached to fortifcations. Not handy for a Mech Army like mine.
Any ideas?
I was thinking of using the Quad gun from the Aegis Defence line kit and putting it on the back of a Razorback.
50 pts but its STR 7, 4 AP, 4 Shots, Sky fire and interceptor.
Dude that is a Red Rope Ranger par excellence.
Another idea is to make the missle launcher have a SAM capability. Use the same profile as the KRAK missle but make it skyfire.
They would have these weapons in there arsenal.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/10/07 12:14:21
MORE BACON FOR THE BACON GOD!!!!!!!!!!
The ONLY Good Orc is a DEAD Orc
Have some pride and paint those minis |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/07 12:13:15
Subject: Air defence
|
 |
Battle-tested Knight Castellan Pilot
|
What about some dreads with two tl autocannons? only hitting on 6's but you have re-rolls...and they're versatile!
|
Stick to the shadows - Strike from the darkness - Victorus aut Mortis - Ravenguard 1st Company |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/07 12:17:05
Subject: Re:Air defence
|
 |
Death-Dealing Devastator
Downingtown Pa West of Phili Pa
|
Nice but when you think of it they would have dedicated AAA units.
I say make the skyfire option a 10 pt add on option to any weapon system.
|
MORE BACON FOR THE BACON GOD!!!!!!!!!!
The ONLY Good Orc is a DEAD Orc
Have some pride and paint those minis |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/07 12:21:49
Subject: Re:Air defence
|
 |
Ferocious Black Templar Castellan
|
That's an excellent way to make sure that no one ever takes fliers.
|
For thirteen years I had a dog with fur the darkest black. For thirteen years he was my friend, oh how I want him back. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/07 12:29:45
Subject: Air defence
|
 |
The Hive Mind
|
I think this is more Proposed Rules than YMDC.
|
My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 12:10:43
Subject: Air defence
|
 |
Dark Angels Neophyte Undergoing Surgeries
UK
|
Arguably all ML's should have SAM capability, even on the most basic level something like a heat seeker could be used against a tank and flyer. For marines it would certainly make tactical squads more "tactical" (same should go for CSM sqds)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 15:31:39
Subject: Air defence
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
InquisUK wrote:Arguably all ML's should have SAM capability, even on the most basic level something like a heat seeker could be used against a tank and flyer. For marines it would certainly make tactical squads more "tactical" (same should go for CSM sqds)
You mean like a Flakk missle?
|
Grimtuff wrote: GW want the full wrath of their Gestapo to come down on this new fangled Internet and it's free speech.
A Town Called Malus wrote: Draigo is a Mat Ward creation. They don't follow the same rules as everyone else. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 16:49:31
Subject: Re:Air defence
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
Flakk missiles will be added in the next codex, which should be sometime in the next year.
The profile is already in the back of the rulebook for what it will be.
And it will replace the Frag and Krak missiles so it makes the missile launcher almost useless against ground targets. And given the Chaos Codex's placement of the upgrade it might be an option only avaliable to Devestator squads.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 16:51:36
Subject: Re:Air defence
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
Flakk missiles will be added in the next codex, which should be sometime in the next year.
Wrong, they are in the Chaos Space Marine Codex now.
And it will replace the Frag and Krak missiles so it makes the missile launcher almost useless against ground targets. And given the Chaos Codex's placement of the upgrade it might be an option only avaliable to Devestator squads.
Wrong again (at the moment)
Havocs can take them, and they don't replace the Frag or Krak missles.
|
Grimtuff wrote: GW want the full wrath of their Gestapo to come down on this new fangled Internet and it's free speech.
A Town Called Malus wrote: Draigo is a Mat Ward creation. They don't follow the same rules as everyone else. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 16:55:48
Subject: Re:Air defence
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
We are talking about the Space Marine codex. They don't have Flakk missiles currently.
And I could have sworn Flakk missiles made you lose your Frag and Krak missiles.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 16:58:22
Subject: Re:Air defence
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
Grey Templar wrote:We are talking about the Space Marine codex. They don't have Flakk missiles currently.
And I could have sworn Flakk missiles made you lose your Frag and Krak missiles.
My Bad Mate i didn't read the whole OP
My most sincere apologies for that epic fail...
And no, but you DO have to buy them seperatly :/
|
Grimtuff wrote: GW want the full wrath of their Gestapo to come down on this new fangled Internet and it's free speech.
A Town Called Malus wrote: Draigo is a Mat Ward creation. They don't follow the same rules as everyone else. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 17:01:16
Subject: Re:Air defence
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
Thats ok
And that does make me wonder why everyone was complaining about the Flakk missiles on the Havocs. The way people were complaining it sounded like they made the Havoc useless in anything but an AA role.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 17:04:03
Subject: Re:Air defence
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
Grey Templar wrote:Thats ok
And that does make me wonder why everyone was complaining about the Flakk missiles on the Havocs. The way people were complaining it sounded like they made the Havoc useless in anything but an AA role.
Beats me...
175 for 4 Flakk missles ain't too shabby imo...
|
Grimtuff wrote: GW want the full wrath of their Gestapo to come down on this new fangled Internet and it's free speech.
A Town Called Malus wrote: Draigo is a Mat Ward creation. They don't follow the same rules as everyone else. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 17:05:39
Subject: Re:Air defence
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
Plus its still 4 missile launchers if what you say is true
If devestators get an appropriate HW discount I'd consider taking them at a comperable price.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 17:12:34
Subject: Re:Air defence
|
 |
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot
|
Bloodhorror wrote: Grey Templar wrote:Thats ok
And that does make me wonder why everyone was complaining about the Flakk missiles on the Havocs. The way people were complaining it sounded like they made the Havoc useless in anything but an AA role.
Beats me...
175 for 4 Flakk missles ain't too shabby imo...
On 5 MEQ guys? Without Interceptor? The Havocs couldn't even fire their Flakks because the enemy (possibly the flyer, to add to the insult) will Alpha Strike them and GG no RE. 175 points out of the window. And 4 Flakks are barely worth a joke. They can do what... like 2 HP damage against AV10/11? For 175 points (5 points more than a Heldrake, 75 points more than an AEGIS with quad)? Seriously  ?
|
My armies:
14000 points |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 17:14:30
Subject: Air defence
|
 |
Rough Rider with Boomstick
Places
|
My Suggestion is this , Take Imperial Guard as Allies -
CCS - Chimera
Infantry Squad - Chimera
Infantry Squad - Chimera
Heavy Support - x2 Hydras = Their saved mean nothing because of the autotarget special rule
|
Motto of the Imperial Guard " If its worth bringing one its worth bringing three"
y
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 00:41:14
Subject: Re:Air defence
|
 |
Death-Dealing Devastator
Downingtown Pa West of Phili Pa
|
That cou;ld work. But the Marines should have there own units. Thats why I am building 2 quad gun RZs. I know making the rules up as I go but boy is it fun.
|
MORE BACON FOR THE BACON GOD!!!!!!!!!!
The ONLY Good Orc is a DEAD Orc
Have some pride and paint those minis |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 00:49:58
Subject: Air defence
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
You could have a look for my Predator eagle - it's a predator with whirlwind missile launchers intended to blow up skimmers in 5th ed
Now it can be a skyfirer with an independant autocannon.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 10:02:52
Subject: Re:Air defence
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I actually wouldn't be surprised if devastators, etc. (i.e. other SM chapter equivalents to Havocs) get Flakk missile options FAQ'd in fairly soon due to the CSM codex now being out and giving the option.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 17:26:44
Subject: Re:Air defence
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Marines already have Contemptor Mortis Dreadnoughts, Storm Eagles, Land Raider Helios, Whirlwind Hyperios, Hyperios Air Defense Batteries, and Stormtalons as Skyfire units. Something tells me you should at least know about the latter.
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 17:29:25
Subject: Re:Air defence
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
GW is going to take their sweet time putting Flakk missiles into Imperial Codices.
They want to sell Flyers while they're OP
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 22:35:26
Subject: Re:Air defence
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Grey Templar wrote:GW is going to take their sweet time putting Flakk missiles into Imperial Codices.
They want to sell Flyers while they're OP 
If Flakk missiles from CSM are any indication of the points cost they'd be anywhere else, fliers have nothing to worry about from them.
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/10 03:49:38
Subject: Air defence
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
The only reasonably useful anti-aircraft weapons available to the Space Marines Codex in terms of price of the model and usefulness of the unit are the Contemptor Dreadnaught (expensive, but two twin-linked Skyfire/Intercept autocannons at BS4 is nothing to sneeze at) and the Whirlwind Hyperios (Interceptor/Skyfire krak missile, 35% chance to down an AV10 flyer in one shot) in Imperial Armor Aeronautica if you feel like shelling out for the book; the Whirlwind Hyperios is functionally the same model as a regular Whirlwind, and the Contemptor would take a bit of conversion work on a normal Dreadnaught but could be made off that base.
If I had my way, I'd have an upgrade to give Land Speeder Tornadoes Skyfire. No aircraft would ever be safe.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|