Switch Theme:

Plasma Cannons and Heavy Flamers on Attack Bikes?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in au
Xeno-Hating Inquisitorial Excruciator





Australia

As the title says - would these additional options be great for variety or OP? I got the idea from some players at my local GW who swear it'll come up in the new DA (and possibly) SM Codex but I feel it's just wishful thinking and grossly unbalanced for an already great model, especially since 6th edition. What are your thoughts Dakka?

   
Made in ca
Judgemental Grey Knight Justicar





Ontario, Canada

well FW space marine jetbikes coming out are getting plasmacannons as an option so theres that

I have half a mind to kill you, and the other half agrees 
   
Made in us
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter







Depending on the cost it could be awesome and reasonably balanced, really. I'd definitely use more Ravenwing units if I had plasma cannon Attack Bikes.

Balanced Game: Noun. A game in which all options and choices are worth using.
Homebrew oldhammer project: https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/790996.page#10896267
Meridian: Necromunda-based 40k skirmish: https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/795374.page 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





The scuttlebutt is that Ravenwing is getting plasma cannons on their attack bikes as it is.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in gb
Hallowed Canoness





Between

Flamers on Bikes is one of those things that comes under the category of Undeniable Bad Idea.

Either you stop to fire the flamer, and lose the benefits of the bike (especially as in-game it's an assault weapon!) or you carry on driving and end up engulfing yourself and not much else.



"That time I only loaded the cannon with powder. Next time, I will fill it with jewels and diamonds and they will cut you to shrebbons!" - Nogbad the Bad. 
   
Made in gb
Worthiest of Warlock Engineers






preston

 Furyou Miko wrote:
Flamers on Bikes is one of those things that comes under the category of Undeniable Bad Idea.

Either you stop to fire the flamer, and lose the benefits of the bike (especially as in-game it's an assault weapon!) or you carry on driving and end up engulfing yourself and not much else.


Ah but here you are obviously forgetting GWs massive boner for SMs. Besides this is 40K-we have psycho mushrooms and elven hedonists......

Free from GW's tyranny and the hobby is looking better for it
DR:90-S++G+++M++B++I+Pww205++D++A+++/sWD146R++T(T)D+
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: