| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 01:17:29
Subject: Question for SM players
|
 |
1st Lieutenant
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
|
Hello all!
I was looking over the GK codex as I was thinking of making up a GK army and I noticed some tactica and things that made me think of a question.
Since all SM codexs can have some/most units "Combat Squad" and the separate Combat Squads count as two different units in all regards. Except the FOC. Which brings me to my next question...
If I bring one Tac Squad (for instance) of 10 people and I Combat Squad it does it count as the 2 Mandatory Troops Choices? I see some people think it does (for lower point games), and I want to know if that's legal or not. Why not just take 2 5 man squads? I think it's because at a full 10 man you get the special weapons....
But the question stands, is this legal?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 01:30:54
Subject: Question for SM players
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
even Combat Squaded, Tactical Squads take 1 Force Organization slot.
So, You have to bring a minimum of two squads, regardless of combat squadding.
|
warboss wrote:Is there a permanent stickied thread for Chaos players to complain every time someone/anyone gets models or rules besides them? If not, there should be. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 01:31:44
Subject: Question for SM players
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
No. It is a single Troops choice.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 01:33:56
Subject: Question for SM players
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
Definitely NOT legal. As you said yourself, they only take a single FOC slot.
You need to fill 2 FOC slots to fulfil the minimum troop requirement.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 01:34:25
Subject: Question for SM players
|
 |
1st Lieutenant
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
|
Ah okay thanks. So then, does that make the AoBR set an illegal army? As it only brings 1 Troops Choice
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 01:39:58
Subject: Question for SM players
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
washout77 wrote:Ah okay thanks. So then, does that make the AoBR set an illegal army? As it only brings 1 Troops Choice
The AOBR set was designed to be an army for C: SM
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 01:42:59
Subject: Question for SM players
|
 |
1st Lieutenant
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
|
I know. C: SM still has to follow the FOC though.
EDIT: Unless there is some Special Snowflake rule I missed somewhere
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/12/17 01:43:21
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 01:45:48
Subject: Question for SM players
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
washout77 wrote: I know. C: SM still has to follow the FOC though. EDIT: Unless there is some Special Snowflake rule I missed somewhere IIRC it comes with scouts? Been a while since I've seen it. Well, nope NM it's an illegal army. However to be fair the AOBR is a thing of its own, with special rules on how to play a game.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/12/17 01:46:50
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 01:50:33
Subject: Question for SM players
|
 |
1st Lieutenant
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
|
Yep. I guess it's not. Neither is the ork army IIRC.
Well, good to know! Thanks guys! Not like you would WANT to have only 1 Troop FOC but....who knows what the person wants to do
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 01:55:48
Subject: Question for SM players
|
 |
Captain of the Forlorn Hope
|
If you just say all the tac marines have bolters, and ignore the flamer/ML it is a legal army. A bit of a proxy, but not a huge stretch.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/12/17 01:56:25
"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.
I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!
We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|