| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/01 17:54:02
Subject: Allocating INTO Challenges?
|
 |
Cultist of Nurgle with Open Sores
|
Hey guys, I came across something in the rules today and wondered if I've got a couple of questions:
Although combatants in a challenge can only ever allocate wounds to one another (see FAQ quote below), can a character in the same combat allocate wounds INTO a challenge through precision strikes?
Although it states under "Outside Forces" that wounds from other attackers cannot be allocated to either combatants, it says under "Precision Strikes" that a precision strike does not follow 'normal rules' for wound allocation - which rule would take precedence here?
Quotes:
Rulebook FAQ wrote: Q: Can Wounds caused by a character in a challenge only be
allocated to the opposing character in the challenge? (p64)
A: Yes.
Rulebook Pg. 63 wrote: Wounds from Precision Strikes are allocated against and engaged model (or models) of your choice in the unit that he is attacking, rather than following the normal rules for Wound Allocation.
Rulebook Pg. 64 wrote: ...Wounds from other attackers cannot be allocated be allocated against either character.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/01 17:56:30
Subject: Allocating INTO Challenges?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
The latter rule is more proscriptive, as it is not a "normal" wound allocation
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/01 17:57:17
Subject: Allocating INTO Challenges?
|
 |
Captain of the Forlorn Hope
|
No you may never have any effect on a challenge from outside sources. Q: Can Wounds caused by a character in a challenge only be allocated to the opposing character in the challenge? (p64) A: Yes. (FaQ P. 5) that is the only way to allocate to an opposing character.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/01 17:57:35
"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.
I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!
We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/01 18:07:48
Subject: Allocating INTO Challenges?
|
 |
Cultist of Nurgle with Open Sores
|
DeathReaper wrote:No you may never have any effect on a challenge from outside sources.
Q: Can Wounds caused by a character in a challenge only be
allocated to the opposing character in the challenge? (p64)
A: Yes. ( FaQ P. 5)
that is the only way to allocate to an opposing character.
Your quote only restricts those already in a challenge from allocating wounds to any model other than one another - not that characters in the same combat cannot allocate to combatants in the challenge.
nosferatu1001 wrote: The latter rule is more proscriptive, as it is not a "normal" wound allocation
I'm confused, is this saying that the latter takes precedence or the former?
Thanks for the responses.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/01 18:16:10
Subject: Allocating INTO Challenges?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
The latter, saying you cannot allocate into challenges, is more definite than a rule allowing you to generally allocate where you like
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/01 20:22:23
Subject: Allocating INTO Challenges?
|
 |
Captain of the Forlorn Hope
|
Right sorry.
This is what restricts you from using precision strikes against characters in a challenge:
Rulebook Pg. 64 wrote: ...Wounds from other attackers cannot be allocated be allocated against either character.
|
"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.
I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!
We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/02 21:16:57
Subject: Re:Allocating INTO Challenges?
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
I don't have my BRB on hand, but I do recall a part from it stating that the challenge is treated as if it were an altogether separate combat from what is actually going on.
|
Click here for my Swap Shop post - I'm buying stuff!
DR:90-S++G++M+B++I+Pw40kPbfg99#+D++A++/eWDR++T(T)DM+
Black Legion/Iron Warriors/Night Lords Inquisitorial Friends & Co. (Inq, GK, Elysians, Assassins) Elysian Droptroops, soon-to-add Armored Battlegroup Adeptus Mechanicus Forge World Lucius
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|