Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/14 21:17:00
Subject: Accountability
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller
|
Can someone give me a reason why This thread was locked? What breach in the TOS was violated because there was no warning, no reason, and no statement given. This is similar to Jimsolo's mysteriously locked thread and both of us would like some sort of answer to why it happened.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/02/14 21:18:14
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/14 21:24:56
Subject: Accountability
|
 |
Old Sourpuss
|
Because hacking is a crime?
|
DR:80+S++G+M+B+I+Pwmhd11#++D++A++++/sWD-R++++T(S)DM+

Ask me about Brushfire or Endless: Fantasy Tactics |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/14 21:31:56
Subject: Re:Accountability
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Kamloops, BC
|
Because the Mods and Amins fear you'll hack there accounts, so are doing everything they can to reduce a threat to there power over Dakka.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/14 22:37:14
Subject: Accountability
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller
|
But the 2nd thread had nothing to do with the mechanics of hacking, only the ethics of doing it.
Why is that against the rules?
Where in the TOS are we not allowed to speak about crime?
There are posts about slaughter, murder, religion, sex and drugs, and suddenly everyone is up in arms about an issue that is probably the most pertinent and prevailing on the internet?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/14 22:44:45
Subject: Accountability
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Kamloops, BC
|
DemetriDominov wrote:But the 2nd thread had nothing to do with the mechanics of hacking, only the ethics of doing it.
Why is that against the rules?
Where in the TOS are we not allowed to speak about crime?
There are posts about slaughter, murder, religion, sex and drugs, and suddenly everyone is up in arms about an issue that is probably the most pertinent and prevailing on the internet?
There's not much to be discussed about hacking as most people know it's bad, that's probably why it got locked.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/14 22:46:24
Subject: Re:Accountability
|
 |
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan
|
You're likely not to get an answer to this question in this thread, it's simply going to be locked - In the TOS you keep referring to, it clearly states who to contact if you have exactly the problem you have (at the bottom).
Furthermore, this is a privately operated site and you and the administrators have no contract between you - they are free to lock your threads for absolutely no good reason at all if they so choose, and you're free to walk away at any time if you don't like that arrangement. Although it's good business to be consistent, the fact is locking a thread for being in bad taste is subjective, and theirs is the only taste that matters.
|
lord_blackfang wrote:Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.
Flinty wrote:The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/14 22:50:39
Subject: Re:Accountability
|
 |
Kid_Kyoto
|
For what it's worth, it wasn't a very good thread for Dakka anyway. I've noticed that threads of a technical nature don't tend to do too well here.
As far as your gripe about percieved entitlements in the Terms of Service, well, I suppose all the money you had to pay when you signed up does give you some clout over being able to post whatever feels good. Automatically Appended Next Post: Terms of Service wrote:However, Dakka Dakka reserves the right to review materials posted to a Communication Service and to remove any materials in its sole discretion. Dakka Dakka reserves the right to terminate your access to any or all of the Communication Services at any time without notice for any reason whatsoever.
O hai.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/02/14 22:53:21
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/14 23:28:33
Subject: Accountability
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller
|
I had no intention of citing an entitlement I am not deserving of because you're right, I don't have one. I merely wanted to know the reason why they thought it prudent to lock the thread.
If I don't get an answer, it's their right.
I don't see a reason why I can't ask though.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/14 23:35:07
Subject: Accountability
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Since your last hacking thread before that got locked, and you started another one, you shouldn't be surprised that it got locked as well.
Especially since by your 2nd and 3rd post you already turned the subject back to the same thing the original thread got locked for. It should really be obvious why it is locked considering it went like this: "I had a thread about hacking criminals, it got locked, so here is a thread about the ethics of hacking.........criminals".
Consider yourself lucky that you didn't get a bigger consequence than a locked thread.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/14 23:46:23
Subject: Accountability
|
 |
Old Sourpuss
|
For Convenience DakkaDakka Code of Conduct wrote:Remember that posting content on this site (or any internet site, for that matter) is a privilege, NOT A RIGHT. Please treat it that way. If something you post is removed due to one of the issues outlined above do not be offended or take it personally. Evaluate what you posted and think about why it might have been removed. If you have any questions as to why something you posted was deleted or why your account has been suspended, please feel free to e-mail any questions to: webmaster@dakkadakka.com
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/02/14 23:48:16
DR:80+S++G+M+B+I+Pwmhd11#++D++A++++/sWD-R++++T(S)DM+

Ask me about Brushfire or Endless: Fantasy Tactics |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/15 07:36:44
Subject: Accountability
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
DemetriDominov wrote:Can someone give me a reason why This thread was locked? What breach in the TOS was violated because there was no warning, no reason, and no statement given. This is similar to Jimsolo's mysteriously locked thread and both of us would like some sort of answer to why it happened.
Your first thread very clearly seemed to ask for assistance in helping to steal via hacking...as though you were either looking for information on how to do it or someone to actually assist you.
Asking others for help to commit any crime is never going to be allowed on this site.
Your second thread, given the content of your first thread, appears simply to be a thinly veiled attempt to re-skin the original thread's concept so that you can see those who reply with knowledge about hacking perhaps so that you can contact them privately. In addition, the off-topic forum still generally needs to be about an actual topic of discussion. I'm not going to try to say that there haven't been complete theoretical 'what would you do?' type threads before in the off-topic forum that weren't locked (because I'm sure there have been plenty), but in general we do try to restrict threads even in the OT forum to discussing actual topics of substance that people replying have some sort of touchstone to comment upon. So if there was a particular news story about hacking activity that you were asking peoples' opinions on, then that would generally be more acceptable, than simply saying: 'what would you do if you had the ability to hack?'
However, given the content of your first locked thread, for the near-future, pretty much any topic you try to start involving hacking is probably going to be locked.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/15 17:58:28
Subject: Accountability
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller
|
Very well, I meant no offense, the 2nd thread was genuinely about the ethics of it, but that's just my word and my word means little.
Thank you for replying.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/15 18:54:34
Subject: Accountability
|
 |
5th God of Chaos! (Yea'rly!)
The Great State of Texas
|
DemetriDominov wrote:But the 2nd thread had nothing to do with the mechanics of hacking, only the ethics of doing it.
Why is that against the rules?
Where in the TOS are we not allowed to speak about crime?
There are posts about slaughter, murder, religion, sex and drugs, and suddenly everyone is up in arms about an issue that is probably the most pertinent and prevailing on the internet?
Hacking is ilegal and immoral. Its like opening a thread "hey whats wrong with murder?"
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/02/15 18:55:56
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/15 21:30:16
Subject: Accountability
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Kamloops, BC
|
Frazzled wrote: DemetriDominov wrote:But the 2nd thread had nothing to do with the mechanics of hacking, only the ethics of doing it.
Why is that against the rules?
Where in the TOS are we not allowed to speak about crime?
There are posts about slaughter, murder, religion, sex and drugs, and suddenly everyone is up in arms about an issue that is probably the most pertinent and prevailing on the internet?
Hacking is ilegal and immoral. Its like opening a thread "hey whats wrong with murder?"
Lol, that was hilarious nice reply Frazzled.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 18:38:40
Subject: Accountability
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller
|
Frazzled wrote: DemetriDominov wrote:But the 2nd thread had nothing to do with the mechanics of hacking, only the ethics of doing it.
Why is that against the rules?
Where in the TOS are we not allowed to speak about crime?
There are posts about slaughter, murder, religion, sex and drugs, and suddenly everyone is up in arms about an issue that is probably the most pertinent and prevailing on the internet?
Hacking is ilegal and immoral. Its like opening a thread "hey whats wrong with murder?"
Or capital punishment....
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 18:43:37
Subject: Accountability
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
DemetriDominov wrote: Frazzled wrote: DemetriDominov wrote:But the 2nd thread had nothing to do with the mechanics of hacking, only the ethics of doing it.
Why is that against the rules?
Where in the TOS are we not allowed to speak about crime?
There are posts about slaughter, murder, religion, sex and drugs, and suddenly everyone is up in arms about an issue that is probably the most pertinent and prevailing on the internet?
Hacking is ilegal and immoral. Its like opening a thread "hey whats wrong with murder?"
Or capital punishment....
I think it was just the fact it seemed so horrifically thinly veiled that got it locked, in the end.
|
BlapBlapBlap: bringing idiocy and mischief where it should never set foot since 2011.
BlapBlapBlap wrote:What sort of idiot quotes themselves in their sigs? Who could possibly be that arrogant? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 19:13:11
Subject: Re:Accountability
|
 |
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego
|
Seems this has been answered now, gonna lock this so this board doesn't get spammed.
Further enquiries can be directed to Yak/Lego/etc if needs be.
|
The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king, |
|
 |
 |
|