| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/14 12:31:45
Subject: Can We Have A "Games Workshop Discussion" Section?
|
 |
Agile Revenant Titan
In the Casualty section of a Blood Bowl dugout
|
So all these GW-bashing threads we've been seeing lately have really made me see the usefulness of having a section of the forum dedicated to Games Workshop discussion. Although there's been a surge in these threads lately, there's always some kind of GW Discussion going on in Dakka Discussions. Having a GW Discussion Section would make it easier to get your opinion on GW across and it'll leave the Dakka Discussions section open to "nicer" elements of the hobby. Dakka Discussions is one of, if not the, thread that sees the most traffic and probably one of the ones that people enjoy frequenting the most. However, not everyone wants to see thread after thread complaining about GW. It's almost a pain at the moment scrolling down to find anything else. With this change, anyone who does want to see GW thread after GW thread can go to the GW Discussion Section. Besides, seeing as GW is such an important aspect of the hobby, I think we'd all really benefit from such a section, even if we didn't want to have a go at them continuously. Thanks, The Shadow
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/04/14 12:36:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/14 13:47:55
Subject: Can We Have A "Games Workshop Discussion" Section?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/14 14:19:29
Subject: Can We Have A "Games Workshop Discussion" Section?
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
|
Seconded. I can only see it causing trouble.
|
Pretre: OOOOHHHHH snap. That's like driving away from hitting a pedestrian.
Pacific:First person to Photoshop a GW store into the streets of Kabul wins the thread.
Selym: "Be true to thyself, play Chaos" - Jesus, Daemon Prince of Cegorach.
H.B.M.C: You can't lobotomise someone twice. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/14 14:44:05
Subject: Can We Have A "Games Workshop Discussion" Section?
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
I wouldn't mind that section existing, imo. It'd separate those moaning threads from all the fun/happy ones we want to see.
And whenever we feel the need to moan about GW (as us Brits love so much), we can dump it all there for like-minded people to discuss with.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/14 17:22:54
Subject: Can We Have A "Games Workshop Discussion" Section?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Such a section would rival 4chan in terms of bile.
|
BlapBlapBlap: bringing idiocy and mischief where it should never set foot since 2011.
BlapBlapBlap wrote:What sort of idiot quotes themselves in their sigs? Who could possibly be that arrogant? |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/14 22:21:55
Subject: Can We Have A "Games Workshop Discussion" Section?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Dakka & /tg/ are already pretty similar.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/16 09:27:20
Subject: Can We Have A "Games Workshop Discussion" Section?
|
 |
Ian Pickstock
Nottingham
|
Dakka Discussions is already a GW bashing sub-forum, we hardly need another.
|
Naaa na na na-na-na-naaa.
Na-na-na-naaaaa.
Hey Jude. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/16 11:39:48
Subject: Can We Have A "Games Workshop Discussion" Section?
|
 |
Old Sourpuss
|
BryllCream wrote:Dakka Discussions is already a GW bashing sub-forum, we hardly need another.
I'm fairly certain the OP meant for such a forum to be created so that Dakka Discussions would be a " GW Bashing Sub-Forum"
|
DR:80+S++G+M+B+I+Pwmhd11#++D++A++++/sWD-R++++T(S)DM+

Ask me about Brushfire or Endless: Fantasy Tactics |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/16 11:41:34
Subject: Can We Have A "Games Workshop Discussion" Section?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
The main difference being you can't loot for .pdfs on dakka and Dakka actually having moderation.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/17 00:20:52
Subject: Re:Can We Have A "Games Workshop Discussion" Section?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
/tg/ has a mod/s. You just don't see him/them. The mods on 4chan tend to work silently, banning and deleting without fanfare, unless of course your demise would be funny to see in which case then they very publicly execute you for the amusement of all.
You are right about the looting though.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|