Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I had a game were my opponent shot GK psylensers (spelling?) at my deamon of slaanesh chariot. He wounds all deamons on 4+ with this weapon, but he cant possibly glance or pen it on a 4+ right?

I would argue that the chariot has no wounds (in shooting) so he has to go strength vs armor? just whant to check with people

That is correct. Vehicles have no wounds so unless the FAQ for GK's has something like it what Gauss does for Necrons or Plague of Rust for Nurgle weapons or something similar, then it is useless against Daemon Chariots

Edit: spelling.

Pretty much^

I don't know why he is bringing Psylencers since they are pretty crappy...
S7 Psycannons are going to wound on 2+/ 3+ anyway.

he brings them on everything because I bring daemons ^^ and they put out more shots and force my hoards to fail saves

SlyasR wrote:
he brings them on everything because I bring daemons ^^ and they put out more shots and force my hoards to fail saves

Psilencers are still a poor choice. Even against daemons, Psycannon is almost always as good or better.
IIRC only against T3 or T5/T6 with no armor save Psilencer was better...

Vehicles don't take wounds, so the Psilencers rule has no effect, its just got its normal strength. Exactly the same like a weapon with poison.

Pilencers suck, theres no way around it.