Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 3000/05/11 20:37:51
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
BryllCream wrote:Ten internets to the person who can show me a wysiwyg asteopath with carapace armour 
EDIT: In any case, Mann's advice is pretty good. If they don't have rules for it, it might be a good idea to let them know an issue has been raised, and that they might want to think about adding one in future.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/05/11 20:38:55
Mandorallen turned back toward the insolently sneering baron. 'My Lord,' The great knight said distantly, 'I find thy face apelike and thy form misshapen. Thy beard, moreover, is an offence against decency, resembling more closely the scabrous fur which doth decorate the hinder portion of a mongrel dog than a proper adornment for a human face. Is it possibly that thy mother, seized by some wild lechery, did dally at some time past with a randy goat?' - Mimbrate Knight Protector Mandorallen.
Excerpt from "Seeress of Kell", Book Five of The Malloreon series by David Eddings.
My deviantART Profile - Pay No Attention To The Man Behind The Madness
"You need not fear us, unless you are a dark heart, a vile one who preys on the innocent; I promise, you can’t hide forever in the empty darkness, for we will hunt you down like the animals you are, and pull you into the very bowels of hell." Iron - Within Temptation |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/11 20:40:25
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Swift Swooping Hawk
|
That was funny Avatar720 -- those old bloodbowl figs had SOOOO much character!!
|
-3500+
-1850+
-2500+
-3500+
--3500+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/11 21:40:35
Subject: Re:WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
One Canoptek Scarab in a Swarm
|
who has all the parts to make any chaos hq wysiwig. as soon as you get a chaos boon, it goes out the window.
|
4500
next army |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/11 23:13:55
Subject: Re:WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Hellish Haemonculus
|
I don't expect anyone to make a switch-hitter model for every possible combination their Chaos characters can wind up with. WYSIWYG, to me, just means modeling all the equipment and options the model was selected with.
I've only run into one person at a tourney who didn't have his models WYSIWYG. He didn't have any gun drones to go in his Tau vehicles, which he had bought secondhand. I still let him play with the models, but told him he was just going to have to run them as though they didn't have any weapons. He didn't challenge me on that, so that's what we did. I always make sure my models are three color quality and WYSIWYG before a tournament, and I should hope other people will too.
As far as I'm concerned, you cannot take options on a mini that you didn't model, in a tourney. And if you didn't pay for the options the mini DOES show, then the mini just doesn't have them. Just my opinion, of course.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/12 14:12:41
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
...and when I assaulted them , I got my butt handed back...
That's just plain wrong. It almost sounds intentional on his part.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/12 16:04:37
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Speedy Swiftclaw Biker
|
This is how i feel on the topic. I am in the military and have a family. If i can find time to WYSIWYG my army and paint it to my sad level of table top quality... then anyone can. Anything short of that if disrespectful and offensive to the hobby.
|
101st MEU- 1500+ pts
Deathwing- 3000+ pts.
Herald Deathwolf- 2500pts.
Deathwatch- 3000+ pts.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/12 16:11:46
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
That's something I've noticed is fairly common, actually. Players who are older, with families, full-time jobs, and other demands on their time seem to be (99%+ of the time) able to budget time to fully paint and model their forces. The guys making excuses that they have no time to do so are usually younger, without kids and families eating their time.
|
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/12 17:16:37
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I had a game where I was playing an ork player who had about 6 trukks. 2 of his trukks had rokkits, and I had assumed they were WYSIWYG so when I saw BS trukks, I assumed the rokkits were somewhere on the table.
I pull my BW right up close to one of his trukks assuming his BS str 5 will do nothing next turn. Uh oh, suddenly it is a rokkit! Then the excuses begin flowing... "the kit doesn't have rokkits, you should have asked, I don't have to disclose, blah blah blah."
The game basically became 'ruined' because either we allow him to play how he wants where he now gets to destroy my BW (which I wouldn't have made the move if I had known) or he now is at a disadvantage because he made moves expecting rokkits.
Either way, one side feels cheated and will whine about sportsmanship. The difference is, that one of us came to an event, unprepared and wanted to bend/break/change the rules of the event.
Also, Overmodeling is a problem. Giving models gear they don't have is an issue. If you plan on going to a tourney, have your stuff in order.
|
My Models: Ork Army: Waaagh 'Az-ard - Chibi Dungeon RPG Models! - My Workblog!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
RULE OF COOL: When converting models, there is only one rule: "The better your model looks, the less people will complain about it."
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
MODELING FOR ADVANTAGE TEST: rigeld2: "Easy test - are you willing to play the model as a stock one? No? MFA." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/12 22:04:53
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
So wait..... you assaulted space wolves with tactical marines and thought they wouldnt have a bunch of attacks? sounds like poor planning.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/12 23:37:34
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Mutating Changebringer
|
nkelsch wrote:Then the excuses begin flowing... "the kit doesn't have rokkits, you should have asked, I don't have to disclose, blah blah blah."
Next time, point out that almost every other ork kit comes with rokkits. Nobz, Loota/Burnas, Kanz, Deffdreads, Boyz, Deffkoptaz and more all have Rokkits in the kits.
The Ork Bomma (if built as a Dakkajet) will leave you with a few huge bombs and 6 rokkitz. If an Ork player can't make a wysiwyg army he chose the wrong faction to play.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/12 23:38:29
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
playedsincedaemonhunters wrote:So wait..... you assaulted space wolves with tactical marines and thought they wouldnt have a bunch of attacks? sounds like poor planning.
What does that have to do with a discussion about WYSIWYG?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/05/12 23:39:00
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 01:08:51
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
nkelsch wrote:I had a game where I was playing an ork player who had about 6 trukks. 2 of his trukks had rokkits, and I had assumed they were WYSIWYG so when I saw BS trukks, I assumed the rokkits were somewhere on the table.
I pull my BW right up close to one of his trukks assuming his BS str 5 will do nothing next turn. Uh oh, suddenly it is a rokkit! Then the excuses begin flowing... "the kit doesn't have rokkits, you should have asked, I don't have to disclose, blah blah blah."
The game basically became 'ruined' because either we allow him to play how he wants where he now gets to destroy my BW (which I wouldn't have made the move if I had known) or he now is at a disadvantage because he made moves expecting rokkits.
Either way, one side feels cheated and will whine about sportsmanship. The difference is, that one of us came to an event, unprepared and wanted to bend/break/change the rules of the event.
Also, Overmodeling is a problem. Giving models gear they don't have is an issue. If you plan on going to a tourney, have your stuff in order.
Did you have a look at his army list? Remember it's your right to fully view the army list in 40k. And: overmodeling violates WYSIWYG as well
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 06:00:57
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Mannahnin wrote:playedsincedaemonhunters wrote:So wait..... you assaulted space wolves with tactical marines and thought they wouldnt have a bunch of attacks? sounds like poor planning.
What does that have to do with a discussion about WYSIWYG?
because he said that he assaulted a unit of space wolves and didnt know there equipped with bolt pistol, ccw and have counter attack. regardless of what the opponent modelled his guys with tournament goers should know space wolves are cc specialists. even long fangs have 2 attacks round 1
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 12:23:35
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
If it is a WYSIWYG tournament, then everyone is expected to be WYSIWYG. It was so this player should have been WYSIWYG. No exceptions.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 12:54:57
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Horrific Howling Banshee
|
I like WYSIWYG in concept, certainly. For those of you arguing for it, though, what is your solution to Harlequins? There's 2 Kisses per box, no Kiss for a Shadowseer, and no Kiss+Fusion Pistol combo.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 13:34:37
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Old Sourpuss
|
playedsincedaemonhunters wrote: Mannahnin wrote:playedsincedaemonhunters wrote:So wait..... you assaulted space wolves with tactical marines and thought they wouldnt have a bunch of attacks? sounds like poor planning.
What does that have to do with a discussion about WYSIWYG?
because he said that he assaulted a unit of space wolves and didnt know there equipped with bolt pistol, ccw and have counter attack. regardless of what the opponent modelled his guys with tournament goers should know space wolves are cc specialists. even long fangs have 2 attacks round 1
Space Wolves bring all of their toys to the fight. In my 2 and a half years of 40k playing, "Standard" equipment has never been "needed" when modeling. My tactical marines have bolt pistols and Bolters, yet all of them are holding Boltguns. The WYSIWYG comes into play when my marine with a rocket launcher suddenly has a Lascannon... Or was I taught how to WYSIWYG incorrectly?
Granted I faced an issue a few weeks ago where I had to drop out of a tournament because my Chaos Marines which are and always have been used as Plague Marines were told they couldn't worship nurgle anymore because they weren't plague Marines  . The Oblits as Chaos Spawn (in the middle of converting and what not) I was expecting to get the no go on...
|
DR:80+S++G+M+B+I+Pwmhd11#++D++A++++/sWD-R++++T(S)DM+

Ask me about Brushfire or Endless: Fantasy Tactics |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 13:44:01
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
5th God of Chaos! (Yea'rly!)
The Great State of Texas
|
Slaanesh-Devotee wrote:I'm considering taking part in a fairly large tournament in Auckland next year, but I was wondering what to expect for WYSIWYG.
For example, I want to take one unit of Chaos Cultists. I was thinking 20 models with Autopistol and CCW and perhaps two Flamers.
However, I have a mix of Necromunda Goliaths and Dark Vengence Cultists. Do you think some having odd shotguns and lasguns would still be okay as the unit is all the same rules-wise?
Using the Heavy Stubbers as Flamers would be too far, right?
Sounds like fun. You can always go through the list at the beginning, and note "these are cultists. All have counts as autopistol and CCW, and these two here are flamers" They're clearly not marines, demons, or something else, so it shouldn't be an issue. Automatically Appended Next Post: Quark wrote:I like WYSIWYG in concept, certainly. For those of you arguing for it, though, what is your solution to Harlequins? There's 2 Kisses per box, no Kiss for a Shadowseer, and no Kiss+Fusion Pistol combo.
Make more. Whats the problem?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/05/13 13:47:20
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 14:18:17
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Old Sourpuss
|
Frazzled wrote: Slaanesh-Devotee wrote:I'm considering taking part in a fairly large tournament in Auckland next year, but I was wondering what to expect for WYSIWYG.
For example, I want to take one unit of Chaos Cultists. I was thinking 20 models with Autopistol and CCW and perhaps two Flamers.
However, I have a mix of Necromunda Goliaths and Dark Vengence Cultists. Do you think some having odd shotguns and lasguns would still be okay as the unit is all the same rules-wise?
Using the Heavy Stubbers as Flamers would be too far, right?
Sounds like fun. You can always go through the list at the beginning, and note "these are cultists. All have counts as autopistol and CCW, and these two here are flamers" They're clearly not marines, demons, or something else, so it shouldn't be an issue.
The basic GW Cultist models aren't even WYSIWYG. There are guys with shotguns, rifles, axes, swords, and no one has any issue when I say, "basic squad of cultists, no upgrades."
Granted, most of the time my cultists live until near the end of the game when they get slaughtered by something that has made it to my back field (Though they did pile on enough attacks to take out Eldrad their last game  )
|
DR:80+S++G+M+B+I+Pwmhd11#++D++A++++/sWD-R++++T(S)DM+

Ask me about Brushfire or Endless: Fantasy Tactics |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 19:06:41
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Alfndrate wrote:
The basic GW Cultist models aren't even WYSIWYG. There are guys with shotguns, rifles, axes, swords, and no one has any issue when I say, "basic squad of cultists, no upgrades."
Granted, most of the time my cultists live until near the end of the game when they get slaughtered by something that has made it to my back field (Though they did pile on enough attacks to take out Eldrad their last game  )
But like ork boys... they have the option to be shoota or choppa/slugga. And you cannot use an AoBR to say 'these are shootas' or overmodel by putting shootas on all of them to say they have both.
So for some units, the simple act of having the correct 'shooting' or 'pistol/ ccw' is more than basic equipment and needs to be visually distinct.
|
My Models: Ork Army: Waaagh 'Az-ard - Chibi Dungeon RPG Models! - My Workblog!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
RULE OF COOL: When converting models, there is only one rule: "The better your model looks, the less people will complain about it."
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
MODELING FOR ADVANTAGE TEST: rigeld2: "Easy test - are you willing to play the model as a stock one? No? MFA." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 19:15:40
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Old Sourpuss
|
nkelsch wrote: Alfndrate wrote:
The basic GW Cultist models aren't even WYSIWYG. There are guys with shotguns, rifles, axes, swords, and no one has any issue when I say, "basic squad of cultists, no upgrades."
Granted, most of the time my cultists live until near the end of the game when they get slaughtered by something that has made it to my back field (Though they did pile on enough attacks to take out Eldrad their last game  )
But like ork boys... they have the option to be shoota or choppa/slugga. And you cannot use an AoBR to say 'these are shootas' or overmodel by putting shootas on all of them to say they have both.
So for some units, the simple act of having the correct 'shooting' or 'pistol/ ccw' is more than basic equipment and needs to be visually distinct.
I'm not 100% sure of what you're saying. There are no multi-part Chaos Cultists models available for sale, so for me to have an official Chaos Cultist model, I can't be WYSIWYG. The Chaos Cultists Box Says it contains 10 components and 5 25mm bases which make 5 cultists. These are the same snap together models that come in DV (I know cause I bought DV and my parents gifted me one of these boxes). So these models if you look at the image below (or in the link), I have 5 cultists and neither of them allow me to be all Autopistols and CCW or w/e their rifle upgrade is.
So what do I do in this case?
|
DR:80+S++G+M+B+I+Pwmhd11#++D++A++++/sWD-R++++T(S)DM+

Ask me about Brushfire or Endless: Fantasy Tactics |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 19:24:06
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Alfndrate wrote:
I'm not 100% sure of what you're saying. There are no multi-part Chaos Cultists models available for sale, so for me to have an official Chaos Cultist model, I can't be WYSIWYG. The Chaos Cultists Box Says it contains 10 components and 5 25mm bases which make 5 cultists. These are the same snap together models that come in DV (I know cause I bought DV and my parents gifted me one of these boxes). So these models if you look at the image below (or in the link), I have 5 cultists and neither of them allow me to be all Autopistols and CCW or w/e their rifle upgrade is.
So what do I do in this case?
Buy more, split them into two groups, have two units with correct wargear.
It is capable of being WYSIWYG, what you are claiming is you don't have to be WYSIWYG because they didn't give you a full functional single unit out of the box.
It is possible to have WYSWIYG cultists, it just takes more work. Pretty sure DV allows for 10 CCW cultists and 10shooty cultists. That doesn't mean you are entitled to a single unit of 20 cultists whatever whim you feel like having that day.
You can trade your unwanted cultists, you can buy 3rd party kits to convert the arms to all one type. You can buy stand-in models. There are lots of options.
If you have more than 1 unit of cultist, it is especially important for them to be WYSIWYG.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/05/13 19:24:23
My Models: Ork Army: Waaagh 'Az-ard - Chibi Dungeon RPG Models! - My Workblog!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
RULE OF COOL: When converting models, there is only one rule: "The better your model looks, the less people will complain about it."
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
MODELING FOR ADVANTAGE TEST: rigeld2: "Easy test - are you willing to play the model as a stock one? No? MFA." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 19:29:55
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Old Sourpuss
|
I will have to double check my DV contents, I'm fairly certain I don't have enough of either to make 1 unit of auto pistol and ccw and 1 unit of autoguns. I will of course double check.
|
DR:80+S++G+M+B+I+Pwmhd11#++D++A++++/sWD-R++++T(S)DM+

Ask me about Brushfire or Endless: Fantasy Tactics |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 19:31:41
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
5th God of Chaos! (Yea'rly!)
The Great State of Texas
|
Ah that is a bit of a problem, if there are two different options.
|
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 19:33:52
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Alfndrate wrote:I will have to double check my DV contents, I'm fairly certain I don't have enough of either to make 1 unit of auto pistol and ccw and 1 unit of autoguns. I will of course double check.
They come with two units of 10.
8 CCW
8 Shooty
1 Stubba
1 Flamer
2 Boss guys
So it makes two units of 10, One with all shooty, one with all CCW.
The 10$ box is a 'booster' which just duplicates models, which of course leaves people growing two distinct units of cultists. Personally, I would get 3rd party arms to convert them, but I am an ork player who is used to being forced to convert.
Most people will be ok with: "I have 1 unit of cultists, they all follow these stats" but as soon as you have multiple units or units with different weapons, it can become an issue. But in regards to WYSIWYG, it is possible, just possibly requiring you to buy a and maintain two cultist units to get 1.
|
My Models: Ork Army: Waaagh 'Az-ard - Chibi Dungeon RPG Models! - My Workblog!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
RULE OF COOL: When converting models, there is only one rule: "The better your model looks, the less people will complain about it."
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
MODELING FOR ADVANTAGE TEST: rigeld2: "Easy test - are you willing to play the model as a stock one? No? MFA." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 19:36:57
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Old Sourpuss
|
Frazzled wrote:Ah that is a bit of a problem, if there are two different options. Chaos Cultists have some options, and everything I'm reading about the Dark Vengeance set says I should have gotten 2 units, 10 auto pistol and ccw, and 10 autoguns. My case at home and what I remember assembling says something different. It's also a case that to get 10 Chaos Cultists with auto pistols and ccw, I'm required to buy 5 of the Chaos Cultists boxes that I linked earlier as there is no multipart plastic kit. I have no problem double checking this when I get home, I'm simply saying that in what I remember assembling I had a pretty even mix without being able to make a unit of 10 each. Edit: FWIW, my cultists on my list are all basic with autopistol and ccw, my opponents know this because my list doesn't deviate much if at all... And 100% of the time, they're not leaving the backfield near my objectives  . I got no problem being wrong in this, I'm just fairly certain my DV set is fethed up
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/05/13 19:38:34
DR:80+S++G+M+B+I+Pwmhd11#++D++A++++/sWD-R++++T(S)DM+

Ask me about Brushfire or Endless: Fantasy Tactics |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 19:55:50
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
You can go to the GW website. It shows the 2 units. 8 dudes, 1 heavy weapon, 1 'bossman' = 10 man unit.
One Shooty, one CCW
|
My Models: Ork Army: Waaagh 'Az-ard - Chibi Dungeon RPG Models! - My Workblog!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
RULE OF COOL: When converting models, there is only one rule: "The better your model looks, the less people will complain about it."
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
MODELING FOR ADVANTAGE TEST: rigeld2: "Easy test - are you willing to play the model as a stock one? No? MFA." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 20:06:33
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Old Sourpuss
|
nkelsch wrote:You can go to the GW website. It shows the 2 units. 8 dudes, 1 heavy weapon, 1 'bossman' = 10 man unit.
One Shooty, one CCW
I'm not arguing that at all! (Note: the part where I said, "everything I'm reading about the Dark Vengeance set says I should have gotten 2 units, 10 auto pistol and ccw, and 10 autoguns [cultists]"). I'm saying what I've been saying, the models I remember assembling were a mix of both, and not enough to make a 10 man unit of ccw cultists and 10 ranged cultists. I did say, multiple times, that I would check when I get home, and that I have no problem being wrong about this. If it turns out that I have enough for 10 man units of each, then I'll look at picking up 10 more ccw cultists so that I can actually play with what my list says I'm playing with. There's not need to spell it out twice when I've clearly acknowledged a difference in what I should should have gotten and what I'm fairly certain I did get. Calm down there boy-o
|
DR:80+S++G+M+B+I+Pwmhd11#++D++A++++/sWD-R++++T(S)DM+

Ask me about Brushfire or Endless: Fantasy Tactics |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 20:08:50
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
5th God of Chaos! (Yea'rly!)
The Great State of Texas
|
Alfndrate wrote: Frazzled wrote:Ah that is a bit of a problem, if there are two different options. Chaos Cultists have some options, and everything I'm reading about the Dark Vengeance set says I should have gotten 2 units, 10 auto pistol and ccw, and 10 autoguns. My case at home and what I remember assembling says something different. It's also a case that to get 10 Chaos Cultists with auto pistols and ccw, I'm required to buy 5 of the Chaos Cultists boxes that I linked earlier as there is no multipart plastic kit. I have no problem double checking this when I get home, I'm simply saying that in what I remember assembling I had a pretty even mix without being able to make a unit of 10 each. Edit: FWIW, my cultists on my list are all basic with autopistol and ccw, my opponents know this because my list doesn't deviate much if at all... And 100% of the time, they're not leaving the backfield near my objectives  . I got no problem being wrong in this, I'm just fairly certain my DV set is fethed up  have you already asseembled them? This screams job oppoprtunity for some arms and magnets.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/05/13 20:09:18
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 20:10:55
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
Old Sourpuss
|
Frazzled wrote:have you already asseembled them? This screams job oppoprtunity for some arms and magnets.
I have indeed assembled them as they are snap together, and were put together in preparation for a 40k game about a month ago. and I wouldn't have any need for magnets as I don't want to be paying for autogun upgrades on my Cultists as I want them as cheap as possible to hold my home objectives.
|
DR:80+S++G+M+B+I+Pwmhd11#++D++A++++/sWD-R++++T(S)DM+

Ask me about Brushfire or Endless: Fantasy Tactics |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/13 20:12:03
Subject: WYSIWYG -- Disqualifications?
|
 |
5th God of Chaos! (Yea'rly!)
The Great State of Texas
|
As noted, if you just have one unit and clearly state it at the beginning I doubt anyone will care. Dude they're cultists...
|
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
|
|
 |
 |
|