Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Here's game one of an RTT I played last saturday. There are a few pics included, so follow the link to read it!

http://knighthammer40k.blogspot.com/2013/06/rtt-615-1850-nids-vs-foot-wolves.html

Thanks for reading! Comments, Questions, and Criticism are appreciated.

Nice to see the Nids perform so well. I always fear JoTWW on my Tervigons when I see the SW.

How do you like the Ymgarls, I cna't say I ever field them. I tend to run gargoyles and zoans/hive guard.

We don't allow enfeeble to stack like that, so do you think you would have done so well without that?

 Roci wrote:
Nice to see the Nids perform so well. I always fear JoTWW on my Tervigons when I see the SW.

How do you like the Ymgarls, I cna't say I ever field them. I tend to run gargoyles and zoans/hive guard.

We don't allow enfeeble to stack like that, so do you think you would have done so well without that?

I'm in love with Ymgarls, and taking them over Hive Guard has worked quite well for me. Plus its a little different than the net lists, which I like.

If enfeeble hadn't stacked, he would have had a single Thunderwolf instead of none. If this was the case, I just wouldve assaulted in with poisoned gants as well as the Ymgarls, which I think would've had the exact same result of dead wolves.

Nice report, well played.

Playing aggressive definitely seemed the right play against his army. How are you finding the biovores? I dropped the 2 from my 1500 point list as they either hit and did nothing or mostly scattered, I don't get on with blast weapons! With Tau dominating now I think they would be handy and it might prove costly at ToS next weekend...

djn wrote:
Nice report, well played.

Playing aggressive definitely seemed the right play against his army. How are you finding the biovores? I dropped the 2 from my 1500 point list as they either hit and did nothing or mostly scattered, I don't get on with blast weapons! With Tau dominating now I think they would be handy and it might prove costly at ToS next weekend...

I didn't mention them because they didn't really do much. Still, I think it is worth the points to bring a few. I disagree with bringing several units, but 2 Bios is a very cheap investment, and is absolutely brilliant against lists like Tau, IG, Orks or Eldar. In games like this, I didn't need them to do much, and frankly forgot them for a few turns, but against Xenos armies, which are popular at the moment, they are very useful.

http://knighthammer40k.blogspot.com/2013/06/rtt-615-1850-nids-vs-ravenwing.html

Game 2 vs Ravenwing is up! Thanks for reading, comments and questions appreciated!

And now game 3 is up vs an unconventional Necron army:

http://knighthammer40k.blogspot.com/2013/06/615-rtt-game-3-1850-nids-vs-necrons.html

Congrats on taking it all. Goooooooo BUGS!!!