| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/17 05:56:01
Subject: Vehicle Strength for Assault
|
 |
Hurr! Ogryn Bone 'Ead!
Castro Valley, CA
|
I was going through the BRB and while reading about vehicles and assaults I saw that if a vehicle moved they are considered to have WS 1 for that assault. Reading on, I saw that vehicles, as in non-walkers, can win the assault if they can inflict more wounds then the other party. What I can't seem to find however is the Strength the vehicle will hit at and at what initiative. For anyone know or can point me to the right direction to determine this? I've thought that for vehicles they would do a single Strength 4, AP -, Initiative 1 to represent a that a mass of metal is slamming into you as they, fluff wise, turn to face you.
|
DS:90S-G++MB--I--Pw40k12+D+A++/aWD-R++T(Ot)DM+
"It is said remorse is the pain of sin. We feel no remorse."
 You are Red/Blue! Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today! <small>Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.</small>You are both rational and emotional. You value creation and discovery, and feel strongly about what I create. At best, you're innovative and intuitive. At worst, you're scattered and unpredictable. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/17 06:01:12
Subject: Vehicle Strength for Assault
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima, Japan
|
gnoise wrote:I was going through the BRB and while reading about vehicles and assaults I saw that if a vehicle moved they are considered to have WS 1 for that assault. Reading on, I saw that vehicles, as in non-walkers, can win the assault if they can inflict more wounds then the other party. What I can't seem to find however is the Strength the vehicle will hit at and at what initiative. For anyone know or can point me to the right direction to determine this? I've thought that for vehicles they would do a single Strength 4, AP -, Initiative 1 to represent a that a mass of metal is slamming into you as they, fluff wise, turn to face you.
There are items of vehicle wargear that inflict hits in assault, for instance Tau Flechette Dischargers. Also some non-vehicle walkers have other ways of dealing damage, such as the Hammer of Wrath "impact" hits from a Chariot.
Non-Vehicle walkers do not, by default have ways to inflict damage in an assault and thus win combat, but some special rules give them that ability, and so the general rules cover what happens then.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/17 06:04:31
Subject: Vehicle Strength for Assault
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
Chrysis wrote:Non-Vehicle walkers do not, by default have ways to inflict damage in an assault and thus win combat, but some special rules give them that ability, and so the general rules cover what happens then.
I suspect that you mean 'non-walker vehicles'...
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/17 06:05:41
Subject: Vehicle Strength for Assault
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima, Japan
|
insaniak wrote:Chrysis wrote:Non-Vehicle walkers do not, by default have ways to inflict damage in an assault and thus win combat, but some special rules give them that ability, and so the general rules cover what happens then.
I suspect that you mean 'non-walker vehicles'... 
I suspect you're right. Non-Vehicle Walkers do not have ways to inflict damage either though, by dint of not existing.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/17 06:10:59
Subject: Re:Vehicle Strength for Assault
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Non-vehicle walkers would be infantry
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/17 06:45:39
Subject: Vehicle Strength for Assault
|
 |
Hurr! Ogryn Bone 'Ead!
Castro Valley, CA
|
Thanks for clearing that up for me, though I would be lying if I said I wasn't disappointed that vehicles can't do something in assault. Ah, well there is still Tank Shocking if I really need to do something, lol
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/07/17 06:46:38
DS:90S-G++MB--I--Pw40k12+D+A++/aWD-R++T(Ot)DM+
"It is said remorse is the pain of sin. We feel no remorse."
 You are Red/Blue! Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today! <small>Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.</small>You are both rational and emotional. You value creation and discovery, and feel strongly about what I create. At best, you're innovative and intuitive. At worst, you're scattered and unpredictable. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/17 07:43:34
Subject: Vehicle Strength for Assault
|
 |
Virulent Space Marine dedicated to Nurgle
no idea
|
The ws is there for being hit purposes, rather than hitting.
What would you suggest they do, doughnuts???!
"My assault marines will plaster your leman russ with melta bombs."
"Ok, Russ' side sponson opens and it starts serving bacon sandwiches."
"Damn, failed ld test. We start eating."
|
You wart-ridden imbeciles! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/17 08:12:36
Subject: Vehicle Strength for Assault
|
 |
Hurr! Ogryn Bone 'Ead!
Castro Valley, CA
|
fuusa wrote:What would you suggest they do, doughnuts???!
"My assault marines will plaster your leman russ with melta bombs."
"Ok, Russ' side sponson opens and it starts serving bacon sandwiches.
"Damn, failed ld test. We start eating."
You can't deny how "great" that would be if it happened.
|
DS:90S-G++MB--I--Pw40k12+D+A++/aWD-R++T(Ot)DM+
"It is said remorse is the pain of sin. We feel no remorse."
 You are Red/Blue! Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today! <small>Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.</small>You are both rational and emotional. You value creation and discovery, and feel strongly about what I create. At best, you're innovative and intuitive. At worst, you're scattered and unpredictable. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/17 09:11:01
Subject: Vehicle Strength for Assault
|
 |
Virulent Space Marine dedicated to Nurgle
no idea
|
Certainly not, though it has had one odd side-effect.
I now have a strange compulsion to build a nurgle ice cream van.
|
You wart-ridden imbeciles! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/17 09:34:01
Subject: Vehicle Strength for Assault
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
All I know is that sometimes vehicles are WS 1 and other times they're WS 2. I play Tau, so I am the only army this matters to, but for some reason it came up once in a really weird game where I apparently assaulted a vehicle for some reason and I've never forgotten it sense.
|
Like watching other people play video games (badly) while blathering about nothing in particular? Check out my Youtube channel: joemamaUSA!
BrianDavion wrote:Between the two of us... I think GW is assuming we the players are not complete idiots.
Rapidly on path to becoming the world's youngest bitter old man. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/17 11:04:36
Subject: Vehicle Strength for Assault
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Normal Vehicles are WS0 or WS1, not WS1 or WS2. Excpet for killakans, which as walkers have a WS, which is 2.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|