Switch Theme:

Maledictions  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Ferocious Blood Claw




Do you get cover saves against maledictions?

 
   
Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





Buffalo, NY

Cover saves can only be taken against Wounds, and Penetrating/Glancing hits.

Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




 Happyjew wrote:
Cover saves can only be taken against Wounds, and Penetrating/Glancing hits.


So, if the Malediction causes one of those, then yes.
   
Made in au
Tea-Kettle of Blood




Adelaide, South Australia

Fragile wrote:
 Happyjew wrote:
Cover saves can only be taken against Wounds, and Penetrating/Glancing hits.


So, if the Malediction causes one of those, then yes.


And only against that effect of the malediction, not the malediction as a whole.

 Ailaros wrote:
You know what really bugs me? When my opponent, before they show up at the FLGS smears themselves in peanut butter and then makes blood sacrifices to Ashterai by slitting the throat of three male chickens and then smears the spatter pattern into the peanut butter to engrave sacred symbols into their chest and upper arms.
I have a peanut allergy. It's really inconsiderate.

"Long ago in a distant land, I, M'kar, the shape-shifting Master of Chaos, unleashed an unspeakable evil! But a foolish Grey Knight warrior wielding a magic sword stepped forth to oppose me. Before the final blow was struck, I tore open a portal in space and flung him into the Warp, where my evil is law! Now the fool seeks to return to real-space, and undo the evil that is Chaos!" 
   
Made in us
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets






No saves are taken against a malediction, that's what Deny the Witch is for.
   
Made in au
Tea-Kettle of Blood




Adelaide, South Australia

 SoloFalcon1138 wrote:
No saves are taken against a malediction, that's what Deny the Witch is for.


That rule does not exist.

 Ailaros wrote:
You know what really bugs me? When my opponent, before they show up at the FLGS smears themselves in peanut butter and then makes blood sacrifices to Ashterai by slitting the throat of three male chickens and then smears the spatter pattern into the peanut butter to engrave sacred symbols into their chest and upper arms.
I have a peanut allergy. It's really inconsiderate.

"Long ago in a distant land, I, M'kar, the shape-shifting Master of Chaos, unleashed an unspeakable evil! But a foolish Grey Knight warrior wielding a magic sword stepped forth to oppose me. Before the final blow was struck, I tore open a portal in space and flung him into the Warp, where my evil is law! Now the fool seeks to return to real-space, and undo the evil that is Chaos!" 
   
Made in ie
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard





Ireland

 PrinceRaven wrote:
 SoloFalcon1138 wrote:
No saves are taken against a malediction, that's what Deny the Witch is for.


That rule does not exist.

There is no permission to take cover saves against maledictions, so yes there is no rule that prevents it... but permissive ruleset and all.
Falcon is 100% on this. You take coversaves if there are wounds inflicted but only on the wounds, to cancel the power it's DTW.

It's not the size of the blade, it's how you use it.
2000+
1500+
2000+

For all YMDC arguements remember: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vbd3E6tK2U

My blog: http://dublin-spot-check.blogspot.ie/ 
   
Made in im
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw





Liverpool

 liturgies of blood wrote:
 PrinceRaven wrote:
 SoloFalcon1138 wrote:
No saves are taken against a malediction, that's what Deny the Witch is for.


That rule does not exist.

There is no permission to take cover saves against maledictions, so yes there is no rule that prevents it... but permissive ruleset and all.
Falcon is 100% on this. You take coversaves if there are wounds inflicted but only on the wounds, to cancel the power it's DTW.
If the Malediction inflicts a wound, but doesn't deny cover, then a cover save can absolutely be taken.
To say no saves can be taken as a blanket statement is not correct.
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




OM is the one that comes to mind that this will apply to most.
   
Made in ie
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard





Ireland

 grendel083 wrote:
 liturgies of blood wrote:
 PrinceRaven wrote:
 SoloFalcon1138 wrote:
No saves are taken against a malediction, that's what Deny the Witch is for.


That rule does not exist.

There is no permission to take cover saves against maledictions, so yes there is no rule that prevents it... but permissive ruleset and all.
Falcon is 100% on this. You take coversaves if there are wounds inflicted but only on the wounds, to cancel the power it's DTW.
If the Malediction inflicts a wound, but doesn't deny cover, then a cover save can absolutely be taken.
To say no saves can be taken as a blanket statement is not correct.

Read what he said grendel. No saves taken against maledictions. You don't take saves against maledictions... you (might) take them against the effects but that is a different thing.

It's not the size of the blade, it's how you use it.
2000+
1500+
2000+

For all YMDC arguements remember: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vbd3E6tK2U

My blog: http://dublin-spot-check.blogspot.ie/ 
   
Made in im
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw





Liverpool

 liturgies of blood wrote:
Read what he said grendel. No saves taken against maledictions. You don't take saves against maledictions... you (might) take them against the effects but that is a different thing.
Then it's a pointless statement. It's like pointing out you don't take saves against shooting, but the wounds caused by shooting.
   
Made in au
Tea-Kettle of Blood




Adelaide, South Australia

Clarification time: You do not take cover saves against maledictions.
However, unless the malediction denies cover saves, you may still take cover saves from wounds and glancing/penetrating hits caused by maledictions, as the rules only require wounds or glancing/penetrating hits to take cover saves, there is in fact no requirement for them to be caused by shooting attacks.

 Ailaros wrote:
You know what really bugs me? When my opponent, before they show up at the FLGS smears themselves in peanut butter and then makes blood sacrifices to Ashterai by slitting the throat of three male chickens and then smears the spatter pattern into the peanut butter to engrave sacred symbols into their chest and upper arms.
I have a peanut allergy. It's really inconsiderate.

"Long ago in a distant land, I, M'kar, the shape-shifting Master of Chaos, unleashed an unspeakable evil! But a foolish Grey Knight warrior wielding a magic sword stepped forth to oppose me. Before the final blow was struck, I tore open a portal in space and flung him into the Warp, where my evil is law! Now the fool seeks to return to real-space, and undo the evil that is Chaos!" 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: