Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/26 02:23:17
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Terrifying Treeman
The Fallen Realm of Umbar
|
Some_Call_Me_Tim? wrote: Mr Hyena wrote:I thought Mr Hyena had a few posts here in the OT that said he was in favor of eugenics-type practices.
Yes.
I believe there was also a question on improving humanity through genes, I agreed positively with removing undesirable genes (same thing as removing bad genes from a vegetable like cabbage or something to improve growth).
Except that humans aren't nonsentient life-forms...
~Tim?
So you're saying we shouldn't get rid of genes that increase the likelyhood of diseases such as cancer and autoimmune disease?
|
DT:90-S++G++M++B+IPw40k07+D+A+++/cWD-R+T(T)DM+
Horst wrote:This is how trolling happens. A few cheeky posts are made. Then they get more insulting. Eventually, we revert to our primal animal state, hurling feces at each other while shreeking with glee.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/26 03:20:55
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Hangin' with Gork & Mork
|
Krellnus wrote:So you're saying we shouldn't get rid of genes that increase the likelyhood of diseases such as cancer and autoimmune disease?
That is genetics and medicine. Eugenics is different, and there is a reason it is asked in the same question as how one feels about Nazisism.
|
Amidst the mists and coldest frosts he thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/26 03:27:30
Subject: The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Enigmatic Sorcerer of Chaos
|
29) The reason some racial groups aren't successful in society is mostly genetic.
Disagree Strongly Agree strongly
nice loaded question. . . .
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/26 04:03:21
Subject: The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak
|
Political Values
Radicalism 96.75
Socialism 25
Tenderness 53.125
These scores indicate that you are a progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as libertarian.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a centrist with few strong opinions.
Mwahahaha! Apparently I'm a libertarian
The test, with all the questions on genetics and eugenics, basically seemed to be an 'are you a nazi?' test. It's probably quite good at establishing if you hold Nazi or other fascist ideologies close to heart, but moving away from that I'm not sure it's all that great at describing the rest of us.
Howard A Treesong wrote:Though some questions don't take objective fact into account. For example the question about military spending. A person with the same values could answer differently depending on the country in which they live, because both relative and actual expenditure are different. The US spends a vast amount relative and absolute on their military, other countries spend peanuts.
Yeah, I thought that too. The same issue holds for a lot of other questions, such as the one on welfare spending. And that links in to the greater problem this and all kinds of similar tests have in asking the questions in a context free environment, and without the option to put in a detailed answer.
The best question that shows that is the one on banking and financiers causing our economic problems. Well, which economic problems - because they're the absolute core of the GFC, but they're not at the core of other meltdowns or recessions, and they're not at the core of more fundamental economic issues like scarcity, so what in the hell am I supposed to put.
Mind you, in hindsight I think that question was just part of the 'are money lenders (read Jews) responsible for the high unemployment in the Weimar Republic?'
|
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/26 09:34:46
Subject: The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Radicalism 47.25 Socialism 12.5 Tenderness 56.25 These scores indicate that you are a moderate; this is the political profile one might associate with a regular person. It appears that you are moderate towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general. Your attitudes towards economics appear laissez-faire capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as right-wing. To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a pragmatist with many strong opinions. I feel so regular today!
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/08/26 09:36:13
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/26 10:43:03
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Xenohunter with First Contact
Loserville - population: 1
|
Radicalism 74.75
Socialism 50
Tenderness 50
These scores indicate that you are a moderate progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a political centrist.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, an idealist with several strong opinions.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/26 10:46:06
Subject: The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Major
Middle Earth
|
Radicalism 14.25
Socialism 0
Tenderness 40.625
These scores indicate that you are a conservative; this is the political profile one might associate with a drill sergeant. It appears that you are accepting of religion, and have a generally optimistic attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear laissez-faire capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as right-wing.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a pragmatist with several strong opinions.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/08/26 10:46:19
We're watching you... scum. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/26 17:02:15
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
Except that humans aren't nonsentient life-forms...
Doesn't really make a difference, otherwise that advocates a sense of discrimination on a species level.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/08/26 17:03:35
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/26 17:19:59
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
5th God of Chaos! (Yea'rly!)
The Great State of Texas
|
Frazzled is real politique!
Radicalism 41.75
Socialism 25
Tenderness 59.375
These scores indicate that you are a moderate; this is the political profile one might associate with a protective parent. It appears that you are moderate towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as right-wing.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a pragmatist with several strong opinions.
This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.
Unlike many other political tests found on the Internet which base themselves on untested (and usually ideologically motivated) ideas, this inventory is adapted from Hans Eysenck's own political inventory which was developed after extensive empirical investigations in the 20th Century.
|
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/26 18:21:56
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Powerful Orc Big'Un
Somewhere in the steamy jungles of the south...
|
Mr Hyena wrote:Except that humans aren't nonsentient life-forms...
Doesn't really make a difference, otherwise that advocates a sense of discrimination on a species level.
Oh dear, I didn't mean to discriminate against cabbages! Did I hurt their feelings?
~Tim?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/26 18:36:18
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Some_Call_Me_Tim? wrote: Mr Hyena wrote:Except that humans aren't nonsentient life-forms...
Doesn't really make a difference, otherwise that advocates a sense of discrimination on a species level.
Oh dear, I didn't mean to discriminate against cabbages! Did I hurt their feelings?
~Tim?
|
Mandorallen turned back toward the insolently sneering baron. 'My Lord,' The great knight said distantly, 'I find thy face apelike and thy form misshapen. Thy beard, moreover, is an offence against decency, resembling more closely the scabrous fur which doth decorate the hinder portion of a mongrel dog than a proper adornment for a human face. Is it possibly that thy mother, seized by some wild lechery, did dally at some time past with a randy goat?' - Mimbrate Knight Protector Mandorallen.
Excerpt from "Seeress of Kell", Book Five of The Malloreon series by David Eddings.
My deviantART Profile - Pay No Attention To The Man Behind The Madness
"You need not fear us, unless you are a dark heart, a vile one who preys on the innocent; I promise, you can’t hide forever in the empty darkness, for we will hunt you down like the animals you are, and pull you into the very bowels of hell." Iron - Within Temptation |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/26 20:05:44
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Radicalism 80.25
Socialism 50
Tenderness 34.375
These scores indicate that you are a tough-minded progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a liberated atheist. It appears that you are cynical towards religion, and have a suspicious and unsympathetic attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a political centrist.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, an idealist with few strong opinions.
This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.
Just about hit the nail on the head there. I'm rather impressed, thank you D-USA.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/08/27 07:03:38
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/26 20:26:17
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
Oh dear, I didn't mean to discriminate against cabbages! Did I hurt their feelings?
No. Kinda the same with those who are virtually living on machines really.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/27 03:19:45
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak
|
Mr Hyena wrote:Doesn't really make a difference, otherwise that advocates a sense of discrimination on a species level.
Umm, seriously, we do discriminate on a species level. We don't think twice about stepping on microbes, but we try to avoid running over small animals in our cars where possible. And then with people we do a hell of a lot more to avoid driving over them.
This is, ummm, for really, really obvious reasons that I'm absolutely certain you already understand.
|
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/27 03:55:48
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Houston, Texas
|
Lot of negative people here.
Radicalism: 25.25
Socialism: 56.25
Tenderness: 59.375
These scores indicate that you are a moderate conservative; this is the political profile one might associate with a sincere clergymen. It appears you are accepting of religion, and have a generally optimistic attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitude towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist and combined with you social attitude this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a political centrist.
|
Finally found my quote from a gym buddy born and raised in South Korea:
"It is the soldier, not the reporter who has given us the freedom of the press.
"It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us the freedom of speech.
"It is the soldier, not the campus organizer, who gives us the freedom to demonstrate.
"It is the soldier who salutes the flag, who serves beneath the flag, and whose coffin is draped by the flag, who allows the protester to burn the flag." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/27 04:16:22
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Hellish Haemonculus
|
Radicalism 63.75
Socialism 18.75
Tenderness 56.25
These scores indicate that you are a moderate progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear laissez-faire capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as libertarian.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a pragmatist with few strong opinions.
Hmmm. Libertarian? Ouch.  Still, as Chekov said, "If shoe fits..."
As a side note, I'm actually very accepting of religion. I feel it's vitally important to our society. I just don't think that the proliferation of any one single religion is required.
Interesting question, though. One of the questions in this quiz is about inheritance, and I was surprised to see it. Are there really people out there that think you shouldn't be able to inherit wealth from your parents? Is that seriously a thing? I mean, I'm willing to discuss the merits or flaws of such an idea, but I was just completely taken aback. It's not an issue I've ever heard of, let alone thought about.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/08/27 04:17:59
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/27 04:23:00
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak
|
Frazzled wrote:Frazzled is real politique!
Radicalism 41.75
Socialism 25
Tenderness 59.375
Hang on, stop the fething boat. Here's my scores;
Radicalism 96.75
Socialism 25
Tenderness 53.125
Fraz is exactly as socialist as I am, but more tender.
|
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/27 07:04:28
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Happy thoughts are for the weak and the ignorant.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/27 12:27:21
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Old Sourpuss
|
sebster wrote: Frazzled wrote:Frazzled is real politique!
Radicalism 41.75
Socialism 25
Tenderness 59.375
Hang on, stop the fething boat. Here's my scores;
Radicalism 96.75
Socialism 25
Tenderness 53.125
Fraz is exactly as socialist as I am, but more tender.
Your tenderness is the lack of guns, and unwillingness to properly defend yourself from drop bear assaults  , also more than double the radicalism
|
DR:80+S++G+M+B+I+Pwmhd11#++D++A++++/sWD-R++++T(S)DM+

Ask me about Brushfire or Endless: Fantasy Tactics |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/27 12:52:52
Subject: The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Trustworthy Shas'vre
In a hole in New Zealand with internet access
|
Radicalism 63.75
Socialism 31.25
Tenderness 50
These scores indicate that you are a moderate progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as libertarian.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a pragmatist with few strong opinions.
This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/27 14:35:55
Subject: The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Battlefield Tourist
MN (Currently in WY)
|
Political Values
Radicalism 94
Socialism 87.5
Tenderness 43.75
These scores indicate that you are a progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear communist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as left-wing.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a centrist with several strong opinions.
This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.
|
Support Blood and Spectacles Publishing:
https://www.patreon.com/Bloodandspectaclespublishing |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/27 14:45:28
Subject: The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Political Values Radicalism 63.75 Socialism 31.25 Tenderness 56.25 These scores indicate that you are a moderate progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general. Your attitudes towards economics appear capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as libertarian. To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a centrist with several strong opinions. Just 1 question as I pay little to no attention to politics... WTF is a libertarian? is that a good thing?
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2013/08/27 14:47:47
Blacksails wrote:
Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/27 14:52:31
Subject: The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Old Sourpuss
|
Libertarian in its 'basic' form is fiscally conservative and socially liberal.... It boils down to, don't spend money on useless gak and pointless bureaucracy, and keep the government out of the private affairs of citizens. They tend to be for low government spending (down to none if it could be accomplished) and are for the legalization of most things as it's not the government's right to tell its citizens what it can't do.
|
DR:80+S++G+M+B+I+Pwmhd11#++D++A++++/sWD-R++++T(S)DM+

Ask me about Brushfire or Endless: Fantasy Tactics |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/27 15:12:35
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Radicalism 80.25
Socialism 68.75
Tenderness 40.625
These scores indicate that you are a progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a liberated atheist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as left-wing.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a centrist with few strong opinions.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/27 16:36:28
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Seaward wrote:I wonder if I should be concerned that I'm the only one who got "very" in front of "tough-minded."
Nah, you're in good company.
Radicalism 44.5
Socialism 25
Tenderness 18.75
These scores indicate that you are a very tough-minded moderate; this is the political profile one might associate with a jaded materialist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as right-wing.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a eugenicist with several strong opinions.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/27 18:42:08
Subject: The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Powerful Orc Big'Un
Somewhere in the steamy jungles of the south...
|
Alfndrate wrote:Libertarian in its 'basic' form is fiscally conservative and socially liberal.... It boils down to, don't spend money on useless gak and pointless bureaucracy, and keep the government out of the private affairs of citizens. They tend to be for low government spending (down to none if it could be accomplished) and are for the legalization of most things as it's not the government's right to tell its citizens what it can't do.
Note that in America, the name "Libertarian" can also mean "crazed conspiracy theorist", depending on who you ask, so be careful calling yourself one. My viewpoints tend to be Libertarian, but I usually don't describe myself that way, and just say I'm socially liberal/fiscally conservative.
~Tim?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/27 19:09:37
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
sebster wrote: Frazzled wrote:Frazzled is real politique!
Radicalism 41.75
Socialism 25
Tenderness 59.375
Hang on, stop the fething boat. Here's my scores;
Radicalism 96.75
Socialism 25
Tenderness 53.125
Fraz is exactly as socialist as I am, but more tender.
Either this test is broken, or. . . . it's broken.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/28 04:54:37
Subject: The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Revving Ravenwing Biker
|
Nah the test is fine for what it is. It is just that that through the text of the internet, you are unable to pick up on exactly how much Frazzled cares about you.
This is a common translation problem.
Frazzled, please try and use more emoticons.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/08/28 04:55:01
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/28 06:09:58
Subject: Re:The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Pyre Troll
|
Political Values
Radicalism 74.75
Socialism 25
Tenderness 46.875
These scores indicate that you are a moderate progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as libertarian.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, an idealist with few strong opinions.
well, that was somewhat interesting
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/28 06:33:05
Subject: The Social Attitude Test
|
 |
Witch Hunter in the Shadows
|
Many of the questions are a little suspect but overall not a bad assessment of yours truly.
Radicalism 44.5
Socialism 12.5
Tenderness 40.625
These scores indicate that you are a moderate; this is the political profile one might associate with a jaded materialist. It appears that you are moderate towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear laissez-faire capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as right-wing.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, an egalitarian with several strong opinions.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|