Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Thoughts on the following:

The new SM Librarian



As a GK player who wants to use Coteaz as an HQ but not the model available and who is always looking for alternatives to stand out a little from the rest of the armies out there, would it be too terrible to modify said figure to use in play as a Counts-As Coteaz?

I think it's not a bad model for coteaz but also not a really good one. If you want an alternate Coteaz why not go with the fantasy war priest models? As a bonus they come with hammers already.

I'd like to ask why you're not into the model.

OT: It hardly looks like coteaz.

 sing your life wrote:
I'd like to ask why you're not into the model.

OT: It hardly looks like coteaz.

It's the fur. I'm just not a fan of the furry shoulders.

As I said in my original post, I just want him as a counts-as, more for the abilities and less for the looks.

 Haunted Mordrak wrote:

 sing your life wrote:
I'd like to ask why you're not into the model.

OT: It hardly looks like coteaz.

It's the fur. I'm just not a fan of the furry shoulders.

As I said in my original post, I just want him as a counts-as, more for the abilities and less for the looks.

It wouldn't be that hard ro just cut it off, y'know.

Oh and on the subject of proxies I like the idea of using the soloman lock model with arms from the official corteaz model [ and the skin painted in african-american tones].