Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 00:49:20
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Jervis Johnson
|
Melissia wrote:You only used a male UFC athlete, and then claimed that women are the same.
Perhaps you should start another thread elsewhere if you really insist on making such unproven claims.
Ronda Rousey is the women's division's champion, and I provided a picture of her (and her previous challenger), therefore you're either lying or not paying attention. In short I've no idea what you're talking about right now, but my guess is that this is the quality of debate you try to maintain in order to increase your post count.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/10/06 00:49:39
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 01:35:39
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Sword-Bearing Inquisitorial Crusader
|
I predict the following.
Celestine will be more expensive. There's no way she's getting by at 115 pts again.
Sisters will be cheaper or overhaul of faith system will give them their pts worth of faith powers. Currently they are 12.5 ppm while Marines are at 14 ppm
Faith System will scale in some way, and the system will be slightly different and or more reliable.
Will most likely be touching on and making changes to : Confessors/Preists, Henchmen Squads, Cannoness, Celestians, Repentia and Penitent Engines.
I'm expecting the inclusion of some sister specific wargear as well.
They're not going to charge us $40+ for a rehash of the WD dex. I'm pretty sure of this.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 01:36:42
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Therion wrote: Melissia wrote:You only used a male UFC athlete, and then claimed that women are the same.
Perhaps you should start another thread elsewhere if you really insist on making such unproven claims.
Ronda Rousey is the women's division's champion, and I provided a picture of her (and her previous challenger), therefore you're either lying or not paying attention. In short I've no idea what you're talking about right now, but my guess is that this is the quality of debate you try to maintain in order to increase your post count. TO THE MODS: How did my post get removed as spam yet all these pages are still here?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 01:52:46
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Kreedos wrote:I predict the following.
Celestine will be more expensive. There's no way she's getting by at 115 pts again.
Agreed, especially not with how she abuses "Slay the Warlord".
Kreedos wrote:Sisters will be cheaper or overhaul of faith system will give them their pts worth of faith powers. Currently they are 12.5 ppm while Marines are at 14 ppm
And models get over 30 with a heavy flamer. Marines at least balanced out by needing to pay for their weapons now, but still, the points are just too clost.
Kreedos wrote:Faith System will scale in some way, and the system will be slightly different and or more reliable.
I would love this.
Kreedos wrote:Will most likely be touching on and making changes to : Confessors/Preists, Henchmen Squads, Cannoness, Celestians, Repentia and Penitent Engines.
Henchmen squads? Do you mean Battle Conclaves?
Kreedos wrote:I'm expecting the inclusion of some sister specific wargear as well.
There is some stuff in 2nd and 3rd I'd like to see come back but I'm not putting money on this.
Kreedos wrote:They're not going to charge us $40+ for a rehash of the WD dex. I'm pretty sure of this.
Agreed. Maybe $30 USD.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 02:24:31
Subject: Re:Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Lit By the Flames of Prospero
|
Tannhauser42 wrote:The sad part is, all GW needs to do is release one plastic SoB box for the basic squad, and they'll sell truckloads of them. I've been watching the SoB auctions on Ebay, but they end up being just a little too pricey for me to go in on them. But that's mostly because I keep spending money on my Red Scorpions space marine legion.
I will be getting the new ebook when it comes out.
Living in Canada, it coasts me around $100 to make ONE SoB troop choice. I would love to start a Sister's Army. I love their fluff and back story. But let's be honest here, thows modles are ancient and are starting to show their age. For that kind of money I could collect one of the Forgeworld armies such as DeathKorps of Krieg, Chaos Dwarfs, or even a HH army and end up with something alot nicer looking to show for it.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/10/06 02:34:38
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 02:29:30
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Personally I've found that I warmed up to their design after I'd been collecting them for a while. I mean, I never thought they were BAD, but I've gotten more accepting of their looks in time.
But that might be Stockholm Syndrome speaking.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 02:33:59
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Lit By the Flames of Prospero
|
ClockworkZion wrote:Personally I've found that I warmed up to their design after I'd been collecting them for a while. I mean, I never thought they were BAD, but I've gotten more accepting of their looks in time.
But that might be Stockholm Syndrome speaking.
I love the design of the sisters of battle, it's more that the sculpts of the models that are starting to show their age, being that most of them came from 2nd ed.
I've painted enough to realize that most of the modles look more like "Drag Queens of Battle" instead of Sisters of Battle. Some of them have some REALLY mannish faces.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 02:37:58
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
It's the models I was talking about. The art (for the most part) is fantastic!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 03:24:54
Subject: Re:Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Arthedainian Captive
Pavis
|
I find myself in the unlikely position of feeling optimistic about the addition of relics. Cruddace did a good job (gasp!) with those in the new SM codex and I am hopeful some of that inspiration remained when he turned his hand to the Sororitas update.
And can people kindly shut up with the UFC and related discussion? Take it to the General forum, or wrestle it out between yourselves if you feel so strongly about it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 03:28:33
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Devious Space Marine dedicated to Tzeentch
|
Anyone Notice in the Pic that the sister has the Inqusitorial I on her chest?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 04:03:18
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Calm Celestian
Windsor Ontario Canada
|
Tyrs13 wrote:Anyone Notice in the Pic that the sister has the Inqusitorial I on her chest?
Actually that is the symbol of the adeptus ministorum which looks similar to the Inquisition but is slightly different.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 04:07:29
Subject: Re:Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Plummeting Black Templar Thunderhawk Pilot
|
If I'm right it is still the Adeptus Ministorum symbol. they are close in appearance though. here is a comaprison, the first one is the Adeptus Ministorum, 2nd the Inquisitor symbol
|
Black Templars 4000 Deathwatch 6000
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 04:15:11
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Tyrs13 wrote:Anyone Notice in the Pic that the sister has the Inqusitorial I on her chest?
All branches of the Imperium (save the Marines) are represented by some variant of the Imperium "I" symbol. Sisters share theirs with the Ministranium (that is the Ecclesiarchy).
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 04:17:57
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
Ireland
|
Most or many of the various Imperial organisations have the "I" as base, which I reckon stands for "Imperium". You can also see it on the Psyker minis, or rather their staffs - the Adeptus Astra Telepathica has an eye in it.
ClockworkZion wrote:All branches of the Imperium (save the Marines) are represented by some variant of the Imperium "I" symbol. Sisters share theirs with the Ministranium (that is the Ecclesiarchy).
The Imperial Guard and the Adeptus Mechanicus don't have an "I" either. I'm not sure about the Navy, but IG has a sword with wings, and the Marines have a skull with wings. It is interesting to note that the left shoulder pauldron on the Battle Sisters' Angel armour has wings as well, but with an "I" in the center. It might be the symbol of the Orders Militant, whereas the right pauldron bears the symbol of the Adepta Sororitas as a whole (the fleur- de-lis).
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/10/06 04:20:52
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 04:19:59
Subject: Re:Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Edit: Got ninja'd like crazy while looking for those symbols! conker249 wrote:If I'm right it is still the Adeptus Ministorum symbol. they are close in appearance though. here is a comaprison, the first one is the Adeptus Ministorum, 2nd the Inquisitor symbol Yeah, it's closer to the first. The "I" is often thought to be the Inquisitorial symbol (both starting with I of course), but the I is used in a large number of the Imperial symbols (maybe I = Imperial) The Adeptus Astra Telepathica:  Adeptus Astronomica:  Adeptus Arbites:  Imperial Nave: The majority of time most people see the "I" symbol is while playing with (or against) the Inquisition forces, so it's an easy mistake to make.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/10/06 04:20:29
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 04:25:02
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Lynata wrote:ClockworkZion wrote:All branches of the Imperium (save the Marines) are represented by some variant of the Imperium "I" symbol. Sisters share theirs with the Ministranium (that is the Ecclesiarchy).
The Imperial Guard and the Adeptus Mechanicus don't have an "I" either. I'm not sure about the Navy, but IG has a sword with wings, and the Marines have a skull with wings. It is interesting to note that the left shoulder pauldron on the Battle Sisters' Angel armour has wings as well, but with an "I" in the center. It might be the symbol of the Orders Militant, whereas the right pauldron bears the symbol of the Adepta Sororitas as a whole (the fleur- de-lis).
Guard fall under the Administranium though, who I think does has an "I". But yes, the Adeptus Mechanicus doesn't use the I, but they're special.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 04:43:44
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
Ireland
|
ClockworkZion wrote:Guard fall under the Administranium though, who I think does has an "I". But yes, the Adeptus Mechanicus doesn't use the I, but they're special. Technically, Space Marines are Administratum, too.
Come to think of it, I guess the Assassinorum doesn't have the I either...
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/10/06 04:44:40
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 04:52:50
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Lynata wrote:ClockworkZion wrote:Guard fall under the Administranium though, who I think does has an "I". But yes, the Adeptus Mechanicus doesn't use the I, but they're special. Technically, Space Marines are Administratum, too.
Come to think of it, I guess the Assassinorum doesn't have the I either...
Everybody uses the I.
Unless they can kill you, then they can do what they want...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 04:55:24
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
So in the Imperium do they say that a girl "wants the I" then?
Man euphemisms in 40k get weird.
On a more topical noted I'm almost, but not literally, dying just to see the pre-order on this thing.
It'd also be nice if GW: DE would just come out and tell us how much it costs.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 04:55:50
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
d-usa wrote: Lynata wrote:ClockworkZion wrote:Guard fall under the Administranium though, who I think does has an "I". But yes, the Adeptus Mechanicus doesn't use the I, but they're special. Technically, Space Marines are Administratum, too.
Come to think of it, I guess the Assassinorum doesn't have the I either...
Everybody uses the I.
Unless they can kill you, then they can do what they want...
AdMech doesn't, probably due to their affiliation with the Cult of the Machine Spirit over the Imperial Cult
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/10/06 04:56:03
Hive Fleet Aquarius 2-1-0
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/527774.page |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 04:59:20
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Squidmanlolz wrote: d-usa wrote: Lynata wrote:ClockworkZion wrote:Guard fall under the Administranium though, who I think does has an "I". But yes, the Adeptus Mechanicus doesn't use the I, but they're special. Technically, Space Marines are Administratum, too.
Come to think of it, I guess the Assassinorum doesn't have the I either...
Everybody uses the I.
Unless they can kill you, then they can do what they want...
AdMech doesn't, probably due to their affiliation with the Cult of the Machine Spirit over the Imperial Cult
And they can kill you, after they take all your guns and tanks away!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 05:07:45
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
Ireland
|
Well, the I-symbol doesn't have to do anything with the Ministorum or the Imperial Cult. I've not read much about the origins, but I'd assume that all those icons are way older than the Ecclesiarchy, which is pretty much the youngest of the big Imperial institutions.
Also, just about everybody can kill everyone in the Imperium, and has done so at various points in the timeline. Gotta love the politics.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 05:16:53
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Kreedos wrote:I predict the following.
Snip
They're not going to charge us $40+ for a rehash of the WD dex. I'm pretty sure of this.
I think you may have too much faith.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 06:24:48
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Adeptus Mechanicus is older than the Imperium itself, so maybe they're just using their original symbol instead of the I
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 06:53:54
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller
Down Under
|
Lynata wrote:Well, the I-symbol doesn't have to do anything with the Ministorum or the Imperial Cult. I've not read much about the origins, but I'd assume that all those icons are way older than the Ecclesiarchy, which is pretty much the youngest of the big Imperial institutions.
Hang on...the "I" doesnt just stand for the Imperium of Man? Awww damn, I was running under the assumption that the Imperium based organisations used the I with different additions (the eye for the Astropaths etc)
Though that might explain why the Ad-Mech use their dual Imp/Cog-God logo as they were pre-existing.
|
Glory is fleeting. Obscurity is forever.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 06:57:15
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Apologies if this has been noted elsewhere, but I see that Kyrinov is gone from the webstore...
|
Theophony"... and there's strippers in terminator armor and lovecraftian shenanigans afoot."
Solar_Lion: "Man this sums up your blog nicely."
Anpu-adom: "being Geek is about Love. Some love broadly. Some love deeply. And then there are people like Graven. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 08:13:42
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Sneaky Striking Scorpion
|
Like it how the sisters on the cover art finally have realistic... bodies as opposed to previous elements for art. Not to say that the old art wasn't bad.
|
...I reject your reality and substitute it with my own...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ThePrimordial wrote:
Tervigon comes out of nowhere. Proceeds to beat the Emperor to a bloody pulp somehow.
That's actually what happened, Horus is secretly a Tervigon.
The inquisition doesn't want you to know.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DS:90+S++G+++M++B+I+++Pw40k07#++D++A++/cWD341R+++T(T)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 08:22:05
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
inmygravenimage wrote:Apologies if this has been noted elsewhere, but I see that Kyrinov is gone from the webstore...
That happened a few months ago. Seraphim superior is also gone [not sure of any others].
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 09:56:25
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch
|
Well, we can all agree on the obvious changes though?
-The saint will cost more. (unquestionably the most OP warlord in the game, and it won't stay that way.)
-Heavy bolters will cost more. (they are cheaper then anywhere else, and on a potentially rending platform its nuts.)
-Heavy Flamers will cost less. (they are more expensive then the new SM codex, and the same as the IG codex-where it is never used.)
-Cost per sister will get 1-2 points lower, unless faith rework is really extensive. (most basic infantry got a 1-2 point reduction lately, at times alongside a small buff)
-The new relics mentioned means that the Canoness (and maybe others) gets some new options.
-Altar of war is (so far) 3 non-mirrored missions who follows the army playstyle, and "hijack" the Eternal War missions.
-Penitent Engines will likely get cost reduction, or total overhaul.
-Warlord traits, so far the supplement-level ones are unimpressive, farsight for example have 2 of them being a direct downgrade of two from the "strategic" table, one who is merely a +1 to WS, 2 others mismatch the army, and only one was really good. other supplements did not have it much better.
I expect at least one, if not two of them will be faith related (reroll faith amounts, reroll faith activation, ways to gain faith, etc.). one-use traits are also popular in GW nowdays.
|
can neither confirm nor deny I lost track of what I've got right now. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/06 09:59:46
Subject: Adepta Sororitas Digital Codex - October 19
|
 |
Sneaky Striking Scorpion
|
BoomWolf wrote:Well, we can all agree on the obvious changes though?
-The saint will cost more. (unquestionably the most OP warlord in the game, and it won't stay that way.)
-Heavy bolters will cost more. (they are cheaper then anywhere else, and on a potentially rending platform its nuts.)
-Heavy Flamers will cost less. (they are more expensive then the new SM codex, and the same as the IG codex-where it is never used.)
-Cost per sister will get 1-2 points lower, unless faith rework is really extensive. (most basic infantry got a 1-2 point reduction lately, at times alongside a small buff)
-The new relics mentioned means that the Canoness (and maybe others) gets some new options.
-Altar of war is (so far) 3 non-mirrored missions who follows the army playstyle, and "hijack" the Eternal War missions.
-Penitent Engines will likely get cost reduction, or total overhaul.
-Warlord traits, so far the supplement-level ones are unimpressive, farsight for example have 2 of them being a direct downgrade of two from the "strategic" table, one who is merely a +1 to WS, 2 others mismatch the army, and only one was really good. other supplements did not have it much better.
I expect at least one, if not two of them will be faith related (reroll faith amounts, reroll faith activation, ways to gain faith, etc.). one-use traits are also popular in GW nowdays.
Faith needs an absolute overhaul. And the living saint... I still have nightmares... Ate a laspred for 7 turns straight. Died every single turn.
|
...I reject your reality and substitute it with my own...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ThePrimordial wrote:
Tervigon comes out of nowhere. Proceeds to beat the Emperor to a bloody pulp somehow.
That's actually what happened, Horus is secretly a Tervigon.
The inquisition doesn't want you to know.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DS:90+S++G+++M++B+I+++Pw40k07#++D++A++/cWD341R+++T(T)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
|