Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/06 14:46:39
Subject: Which ASSAULT army, should I play?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Daemon rush with fiends/hounds/screamers. Deep strike your troops and take two FMC and three soulgrinders. You can even keep it simple by taking one big guy and four heralds on mounts to keep pace with your fast attack. Daemons can beat the deathstars and dont have to feature much shooting.
Deathstar armies are in poor taste being the flavor of the month this edition. You can take or counter them with daemons the easiest (see Adepticon this weekend). Hopefully you wont have to deal with it much.
All other assault armies need shooting now to be effective. Orks, Tyranids, Chaos, etc all need guns to work. Automatically Appended Next Post: Davor wrote:Thing with Deamons, it's hit or miss. Either you roll lucky on your charts, or you roll poorly. If you don't mind the random army you maybe fielding, it can be the army for you.
The warpstorm table is much better for the Daemon player. Taking Fateweaver or rolling the warlord trait makes it lopsided. Daemon armies 2nd turn charge and habe a bevy of tools.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/04/06 14:52:23
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/06 19:03:54
Subject: Re:Which ASSAULT army, should I play?
|
 |
Hellish Haemonculus
|
I say Grey Knights.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/06 19:05:54
Subject: Re:Which ASSAULT army, should I play?
|
 |
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
Not an assault army, but one of the better meq choices.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/06 21:24:10
Subject: Which ASSAULT army, should I play?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Grey knights come with shunting, small arms with the assault profile, free power weapons on everything, and hammerhand.
If that's not an assault army, I don't know what is.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/07 06:03:03
Subject: Which ASSAULT army, should I play?
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
Davor wrote:Why do you not choose Nids or Orks? I would think going assault you would want lots of bodies to soak up the shots, so Nids or Orks could be the way to go. Go horde instead of small Elite, unless that is your plan. Tyranids aren't an assault army. They have good assault units, but the main focus of the army is close ranged firepower supported by mid and sometimes long ranged firepower. Once they've done damage, you should have set your assault units up for a mop up assault. Tyranids being an assault army is a big misconception, and playing them as such is a great way to make the game hard for yourself.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/04/07 06:03:24
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/07 13:23:48
Subject: Which ASSAULT army, should I play?
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
Murfreesboro, TN
|
PrinceRaven wrote:Chaos Daemons are the only "assault" army in 40k, everything else that pretends to be an assault army is a "shoot and assault" army or a "dies horribly" army.
Eldar+ DE Beast-star is currently the top of the assault army lists. What other army can pull off a single CC thats over 2 feet long on turn 2 and potentially win it in the first round?
|
"I'm not much for prejudice, I prefer to judge people by whats inside, and how much fun it is to get to those insides." - Unknown Haemonculi |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/07 14:37:01
Subject: Which ASSAULT army, should I play?
|
 |
Tea-Kettle of Blood
Adelaide, South Australia
|
Is that really an assault army though? I see a shooty army with a CC deathstar.
|
Ailaros wrote:You know what really bugs me? When my opponent, before they show up at the FLGS smears themselves in peanut butter and then makes blood sacrifices to Ashterai by slitting the throat of three male chickens and then smears the spatter pattern into the peanut butter to engrave sacred symbols into their chest and upper arms.
I have a peanut allergy. It's really inconsiderate.
"Long ago in a distant land, I, M'kar, the shape-shifting Master of Chaos, unleashed an unspeakable evil! But a foolish Grey Knight warrior wielding a magic sword stepped forth to oppose me. Before the final blow was struck, I tore open a portal in space and flung him into the Warp, where my evil is law! Now the fool seeks to return to real-space, and undo the evil that is Chaos!" |
|
 |
 |
|