Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Perhaps this is just me. But reading the inquisitorial codex and I notice that coteaz has a psyber eagle listed in his wargear. Yet no where can I find the rules for said eagle? Is it an FAQ?

In the e-book version the details for the eagle are listed with Coteaz's profile. Just below the list of Wargear.

Grey knights codex should have it.

 Khaine's Wrath wrote:
Perhaps this is just me. But reading the inquisitorial codex and I notice that coteaz has a psyber eagle listed in his wargear. Yet no where can I find the rules for said eagle? Is it an FAQ?

It a D6 S4 shots. Don't recall the range or ap.

-Matt

S4 Ap-

24 inches.

 Scipio Africanus wrote:
Grey knights codex should have it.

This is just plain unhelpful. He clearly states that he uses the INQ book, not GK. As a DA player, you wouldn't direct me to the SM book for a random rule that might be missing--it should be in my own codex.

v1 of the INQ.epub did not have the Psyber Eagle information listed anywhere in the book.
v2 (which you can download from your BL account) does have the profile on Coteaz's page, but still does not list it in the Reference section.

There is a trade-off for getting v2 of the Codex, though: while it adds Coteaz's shooting attack, it also removes power "weapon" from DCA and Crusaders, and replaces it with power "sword."

 Elric Greywolf wrote:

 Scipio Africanus wrote:
Grey knights codex should have it.

This is just plain unhelpful. He clearly states that he uses the INQ book, not GK. As a DA player, you wouldn't direct me to the SM book for a random rule that might be missing--it should be in my own codex.

v1 of the INQ.epub did not have the Psyber Eagle information listed anywhere in the book.
v2 (which you can download from your BL account) does have the profile on Coteaz's page, but still does not list it in the Reference section.

There is a trade-off for getting v2 of the Codex, though: while it adds Coteaz's shooting attack, it also removes power "weapon" from DCA and Crusaders, and replaces it with power "sword."

You always use the most up-to-date rules. How can you lecture me on being helpful while suggesting a poster use out of date rules materials?

To not end this post in tu quo que, I had misinterpreted inquisitorial codex as being the codex with inquisitors in it, i.e; GK. I was not aware that the inquisition had its own codex.

 Scipio Africanus wrote:
How can you lecture me on being helpful while suggesting a poster use out of date rules materials?

Welllllllllllllll...see my above post for a practical example, I guess?

To not end this post in tu quo que, I had misinterpreted inquisitorial codex as being the codex with inquisitors in it, i.e; GK. I was not aware that the inquisition had its own codex.

Fair enough.
You should check out =][=, it's got some pretty cool stuff. Namely the ability to take GK Fun-Grenades in any Imperial list, as well as a few Xenos.