Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/16 14:53:55
Subject: Gauss and buildings
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Do gauss weapons auto glance buildings on a 6? Example, Aquilla strong point.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/16 15:12:54
Subject: Re:Gauss and buildings
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
From the new mini-White Dwarf, issue 6:
Q: I was wondering whether anti-vehicle abilities such as Armour Bane, Tank Hunter, Melta, and Haywire affect buildings and fortifications?
A: The simple answer to this question is yes. Armour Bane, Tank Hunter, Melta and Haywire all affect vehicles, buildings and fortifications.
Generally you can imagine this is because experts at targeting weak spots on tanks will be pretty good at hitting the vulnerable parts on bunkers, gun turrets and so on. Likewise, a weapon designed to chew through tank armour will do equally well against armoured walls, while a haywire grenade will scramble the electronics of a Firestorm Redoubt just as easily as a Leman Russ.
So yes, following that precedent Gauss will work as well.
And yes, I am miffed that I now need to buy the weekly White Dwarf (and remember which issue pertains to questions) to keep up with FAQ's.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/16 21:02:55
Subject: Gauss and buildings
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
It's frustrating to try and bring vehicles and buildings when your main opponent is the Necrons. Thanks for the answer even if I didn't like it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/16 22:28:15
Subject: Gauss and buildings
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Remember though that Gauss will only cause someone inside to take a Wound with Ignore Cover SR.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/16 22:34:28
Subject: Gauss and buildings
|
 |
Sneaky Striking Scorpion
|
In all fairness, necrons have little anti-superheavy weapons, so it kind of balances them out in a way. Kind of like Kabalites and MCs, Necrons and Vehicles.
|
...I reject your reality and substitute it with my own...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ThePrimordial wrote:
Tervigon comes out of nowhere. Proceeds to beat the Emperor to a bloody pulp somehow.
That's actually what happened, Horus is secretly a Tervigon.
The inquisition doesn't want you to know.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DS:90+S++G+++M++B+I+++Pw40k07#++D++A++/cWD341R+++T(T)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/16 22:43:18
Subject: Gauss and buildings
|
 |
Thane of Dol Guldur
|
Timmy149 wrote:In all fairness, necrons have little anti-superheavy weapons.
??
Gauss
Voltaic Staffs
Transcendent C'Tan
Tesla sometimes
Turn a Super Heavy into scrap metal in 1 turn.
Mind in the Machine can take that sumbich over and unload all that dakka on its own troops.
I aint scared of no Super Heavy.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/16 23:10:09
Subject: Gauss and buildings
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Vanished Completely
|
Timmy149, Most factions do not have any "dedicated anti-heavy" options, how can they when Super-heavies where introduced by supplemental Rules and never addressed in the Basic Rule Book or Vanilla Codex's? Short of taking a Lord of War option ourselves, or some sort of Massive structure from Stronghold Assault, the best we can do is re-purpose what we have and hope for the best.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/16 23:11:01
8th made it so I can no longer sway Tau onto the side of Chaos, but they will eventually turn aside from their idea of the Greater Good to embrace the Greatest of pleasures. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/18 02:06:33
Subject: Gauss and buildings
|
 |
Sneaky Striking Scorpion
|
JinxDragon wrote:Timmy149,
Most factions do not have any "dedicated anti-heavy" options, how can they when Super-heavies where introduced by supplemental Rules and never addressed in the Basic Rule Book or Vanilla Codex's?
Short of taking a Lord of War option ourselves, or some sort of Massive structure from Stronghold Assault, the best we can do is re-purpose what we have and hope for the best.
I more mean like lascannon spam and the like, that most other races can do. Badly worded comment, sorry about the misunderstandings.
|
...I reject your reality and substitute it with my own...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ThePrimordial wrote:
Tervigon comes out of nowhere. Proceeds to beat the Emperor to a bloody pulp somehow.
That's actually what happened, Horus is secretly a Tervigon.
The inquisition doesn't want you to know.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DS:90+S++G+++M++B+I+++Pw40k07#++D++A++/cWD341R+++T(T)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
|