Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/17 11:09:13
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
France
|
So I was thinking about to maybe squad up 3 demolishers, because 3 av 14 tanks with force 10 and ap 2 with the tank commander orders increasing they capability of killing stuff, who are demolishing ( what they are supposed to do) everything on their way could be a bit of madness to watch.
It is just my thought but what are you thinking about it and please don't BLAM me, I'm just a new one.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/05/17 11:13:24
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/17 11:29:09
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Temple Prime
|
This may not be super-competetive, but it is the awesome and thus correct option.
|
Midnightdeathblade wrote:Think of a daemon incursion like a fart you don't quite trust... you could either toot a little puff of air, bellow a great effluvium, or utterly sh*t your pants and cry as it floods down your leg.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/17 11:50:43
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
Kain wrote:This may not be super-competetive, but it is the awesome and thus correct option.
I second that motion.
Awesome = Correct.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/17 14:51:17
Subject: Re:Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
France
|
And If I do squad up 3 of them, what should I give them? Should they stay naked and or should I give them a hullmounted lascannon or any sponsons ? And should I try to keep a techpriest near them to fix a hull point (yay) and give one of them "Power of the Machine Spirit" so they can use the sponsons or the hull weapon at full BS ?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/18 11:14:17
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Discriminating Deathmark Assassin
|
I wouldn't bother. I'd just back them up with lots of other tanks.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/18 12:08:13
Subject: Re:Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
General Orange wrote:And If I do squad up 3 of them, what should I give them? Should they stay naked and or should I give them a hullmounted lascannon or any sponsons ? And should I try to keep a techpriest near them to fix a hull point (yay) and give one of them "Power of the Machine Spirit" so they can use the sponsons or the hull weapon at full BS ?
Power of the Machine spirit on effects a single weapon. Just one.
And if any Demoliser cannons are fired, all other weapons on the tank are snap shots. So sponsons/Lascannon are a bad idea.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/18 12:24:22
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Dour Wolf Priest with Iron Wolf Amulet
|
It's definitely overkill, but if I were to run 3 they'd all be naked. I think 3 S10 AP2 blasts should be enough to kill most anything.
If you insisted on sponsons then heavy bolters could be half decent with some prescience support. 27 S5 AP4 snap shots with re-rolls to hit is actually half decent, but I'm not so sure it'd be worth the 60pts you pay for it. Still, it's not like this is the most practical squad anyway, so do what you think is awesome.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/18 12:28:51
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
Andilus Greatsword wrote:27 S5 AP4 snap shots with re-rolls to hit is actually half decent, but I'm not so sure it'd be worth the 60pts you pay for it.
More like 110pts, that Psyker isn't free
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/18 13:00:30
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
Run your demolisher in a tank commander's squadron. make use of that flat out move!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/18 13:13:05
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
Have them leading a conscript charge = most hilariously grimdark game you'll ever play
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/18 13:27:37
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Dour Wolf Priest with Iron Wolf Amulet
|
Selym wrote:
Have them leading a conscript charge = most hilariously grimdark game you'll ever play
Hell, put 50 Conscripts in front as a meat shield. If you're really lucky, you'll have some blasts scatter onto your own meat shields. GRIMDARK TO DA MAX!
Haha, well at least that psyker helps out in other departments. If he gets Forewarning or one of the other awesome Divination powers to buff the Demolishers or a nearby squad, then that's just gravy.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/18 14:43:02
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Rough Rider with Boomstick
|
Sounds pretty awesome, but it will be very much over kill, which is good  .
|
My blog! 1,500 Points II 1,500 Points II 125
Have a nice day. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/21 15:28:08
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Guard Heavy Weapon Crewman
|
Tank commander with three demolishers and an enginseer behind giving out potms? Combine with the order thats all three demolishers hitting different targets?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/21 17:13:32
Subject: Re:Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
France
|
Yes, and this is my idea of overkilling
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/21 18:09:22
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Assault Kommando
Flint, Mi
|
Split fire would only allow the TC to shoot a different target, the other 2 tanks would have to shoot the same target.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/21 23:00:14
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair
|
Tenzilla wrote:Split fire would only allow the TC to shoot a different target, the other 2 tanks would have to shoot the same target.
Order Issued, 1 Target.
Unit Shooting, second target.
Awakened machine from engineseer, third target.
|
This is my Rulebook. There are many Like it, but this one is mine. Without me, my rulebook is useless. Without my rulebook, I am useless.
Stop looking for buzz words and start reading the whole sentences.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/21 23:09:17
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
As above.
The Split fire Order doesn't work on tanks. But the Tank Order and Techpriest does.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/22 20:08:30
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Guard Heavy Weapon Crewman
|
Sorry if i wasnt very clear with my explanation. But you got it now use the tank order to order the tc to fire at one unit then use the potms to order 1 tanks demolisher to fire at another unit and the third tank fires at the original unit with the demolisher and two snap firing lascannons :-)
General orange Overkill is underrated :-)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/22 20:33:23
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Black Templar Dreadnought
|
Ah, I can see it all now:
The conscripts with a priest ordering forward, claiming the close firing demolisher cannons cannot hurt the faithful...
A tank commander unloading forward, a wingman to the side, and a techpriest cajoling the third tank to not be a conformist... while his two plasma cannon firing servitors vaporize anyone close, as the beast makes up it's mind.
Glorious!
|
A revolution is an idea which has found its bayonets.
Napoleon Bonaparte |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/22 20:58:12
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
Talizvar wrote:Ah, I can see it all now:
The conscripts with a priest ordering forward, claiming the close firing demolisher cannons cannot hurt the faithful...
A tank commander unloading forward, a wingman to the side, and a techpriest cajoling the third tank to not be a conformist... while his two plasma cannon firing servitors vaporize anyone close, as the beast makes up it's mind.
Glorious!
Now that's how you Forge a Narrative (tm)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/05/22 20:58:23
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/22 21:57:41
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
Manchester, UK
|
Kommissar Kel wrote: Tenzilla wrote:Split fire would only allow the TC to shoot a different target, the other 2 tanks would have to shoot the same target.
Order Issued, 1 Target.
Unit Shooting, second target.
Awakened machine from engineseer, third target.
It would be too late to fire a weapon with POTMS though, as the unit has already shot when you give the order. You wouldn't be able to go back and shoot the unit again.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/22 23:28:24
Subject: Squadding 3 leman russ demolishers ?
|
 |
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair
|
Trickstick wrote: Kommissar Kel wrote: Tenzilla wrote:Split fire would only allow the TC to shoot a different target, the other 2 tanks would have to shoot the same target.
Order Issued, 1 Target.
Unit Shooting, second target.
Awakened machine from engineseer, third target.
It would be too late to fire a weapon with POTMS though, as the unit has already shot when you give the order. You wouldn't be able to go back and shoot the unit again.
You are correct.
I didn't run back to double check tank commander orders; which are also beginning of the shooting phase like voice of command orders.
|
This is my Rulebook. There are many Like it, but this one is mine. Without me, my rulebook is useless. Without my rulebook, I am useless.
Stop looking for buzz words and start reading the whole sentences.
|
|
 |
 |
|