Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/26 10:36:32
Subject: Formations and objective secure
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
The rulebook states that Objective Secured is a advantage you get in your primary and allied detachments.
Does that mean that troops from formations you includes in your army does not have the Objective Secured rule?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/26 10:37:11
Subject: Formations and objective secure
|
 |
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
Looks like it
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/26 10:38:19
Subject: Formations and objective secure
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Yep, unless the formation rules themselves gives it to the units in the formation (like with that Tyranid Skyblight formation).
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/26 10:39:06
Subject: Formations and objective secure
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
|
It only applies to detachments that have the rule. That is, Combined Arms and Allied detachments, as well as any specific data slates that might have it.
Note that there is a difference between Primary detachments and Combined Arms detachments.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/26 10:57:42
Subject: Formations and objective secure
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
This is the case, and it's perfectly reasonable.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/26 11:58:04
Subject: Formations and objective secure
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Reasonable indeed, just wanted to make sure
And that means that the special rule on Tyranid Skyblight isn't useless anymore as I first thought when I heard the rumors for 7th.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/26 13:40:23
Subject: Formations and objective secure
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
codedaemon wrote:Reasonable indeed, just wanted to make sure
And that means that the special rule on Tyranid Skyblight isn't useless anymore as I first thought when I heard the rumors for 7th.
Skyblight would overrule main rulebook.
Advanced>Generic
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/05/26 14:01:03
Subject: Formations and objective secure
|
 |
Agile Revenant Titan
|
It seems that way. A crying shame that endless swarm doesn't get it.....
|
You sought to cower behind your walls, weakling? Instead, by the will of Khorne, you shall die behind them |
|
 |
 |
|