Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 12:57:51
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
Daba wrote: Selym wrote:
GW even said that it was the IG models that were the wrong size (too large), and that the rest of the 40k infantry were roughly correct.
Basically this.
Also, wasn't the 8-9 foot marine stated to be 'unusually large' in the actual book, and the author is known for injecting 'largeness' to even non Marines? Somehow, this one large guy was projected onto all marines?
No, he was not.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 13:46:31
Subject: Re:Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Lurking Gaunt
|
I think that proportion is also an issue. Just look at Commissar Yarrick's powerclaw, ridiculous.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 14:07:34
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Ashiraya wrote: Daba wrote: Selym wrote:
GW even said that it was the IG models that were the wrong size (too large), and that the rest of the 40k infantry were roughly correct.
Basically this.
Also, wasn't the 8-9 foot marine stated to be 'unusually large' in the actual book, and the author is known for injecting 'largeness' to even non Marines? Somehow, this one large guy was projected onto all marines?
No, he was not.
Ah, so it's just a case of other some BL authors and being ignorant then I guess.
|
hello |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 14:16:53
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
Daba wrote: Ashiraya wrote: Daba wrote: Selym wrote:
GW even said that it was the IG models that were the wrong size (too large), and that the rest of the 40k infantry were roughly correct.
Basically this.
Also, wasn't the 8-9 foot marine stated to be 'unusually large' in the actual book, and the author is known for injecting 'largeness' to even non Marines? Somehow, this one large guy was projected onto all marines?
No, he was not.
Ah, so it's just a case of other some BL authors and being ignorant then I guess.
Different opinion on a subjective matter =/= ignorance.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 14:18:48
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
If they didn't check up on or wilfully ignored what the sources said beforehand and what went in the universe, it is ignorance going into the subject.
It's not like it was with the Ian Watson books where there was a blank slate with nothing to work from.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/07 14:21:46
hello |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 14:19:13
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Ashiraya wrote: Harriticus wrote:GW doesn't know how to scale models very well. If you think 10 Space Marine mini's can fit inside a Rhino ur funny.
See if you can fit 5 Ogryns into a Chimera. 
You mean 20 boyz in a wagon...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 14:23:42
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
Daba wrote:If they didn't check up on or wilfully ignored what the sources said beforehand and what went in the universe, it is ignorance going into the subject.
It's not like it was with the Ian Watson books where there was a blank slate with nothing to work from.
Actually, the BL guys decide what is canon just as much as the studio guys.
They could write that Marines are 12 ft and it would be true.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 14:28:21
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Ashiraya wrote: Daba wrote:If they didn't check up on or wilfully ignored what the sources said beforehand and what went in the universe, it is ignorance going into the subject.
It's not like it was with the Ian Watson books where there was a blank slate with nothing to work from.
Actually, the BL guys decide what is canon just as much as the studio guys.
They could write that Marines are 12 ft and it would be true.
Or 1' midgets that get stomped on by Ork Boyz because that is propa?
Actually, which books actually state it as 8'? I don't even think BL is responsible, I think it is more fan perception.
|
hello |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 14:39:46
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
Daba wrote:
Or 1' midgets that get stomped on by Ork Boyz because that is propa?
If they did so, certainly. They haven't yet done so.
Actually, which books actually state it as 8'? I don't even think BL is responsible, I think it is more fan perception.
Eight feet? No idea. Why?
I've seen nine and seven feet, but not eight.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/07 14:40:18
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 15:12:49
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Pulsating Possessed Chaos Marine
|
Ashiraya wrote: Daba wrote:
Or 1' midgets that get stomped on by Ork Boyz because that is propa?
If they did so, certainly. They haven't yet done so.
Actually, which books actually state it as 8'? I don't even think BL is responsible, I think it is more fan perception.
Eight feet? No idea. Why?
I've seen nine and seven feet, but not eight.
Sergeant Priad in Brotherhood of the Snake was 8 feet tall.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/07 15:14:05
"Glory to the Iron father!"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 15:14:45
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
Interesting. So, between the models and various books, there is precedent for everything between 6 and 10 feet.
Lovely.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 15:17:44
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Pulsating Possessed Chaos Marine
|
Ashiraya wrote:Interesting. So, between the models and various books, there is precedent for everything between 6 and 10 feet.
Lovely.
Pretty much, I guess. 10 ft? Who was that tall?
|
"Glory to the Iron father!"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 15:37:01
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
Lord Tarkin wrote: Ashiraya wrote:Interesting. So, between the models and various books, there is precedent for everything between 6 and 10 feet.
Lovely.
Pretty much, I guess. 10 ft? Who was that tall?
...I am fairly sure I have seen that. Don't quote me on that though. I'll see if I can find the source.
I have sources available for everything between six and nine feet, though.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 15:57:53
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
Well, the nine feet source you quoted earlier is pretty vague. It doesn't actually say that. We do not know how tall the person who the marine is compared to is. And anyway it is just an expression for a rough estimate. And of course this is a statement about this single marine, and cannot be extrapolated to be an average height of marines in general, especially considering the amount of material which contradicts this.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 16:16:04
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
Crimson wrote:Well, the nine feet source you quoted earlier is pretty vague. It doesn't actually say that. We do not know how tall the person who the marine is compared to is. And anyway it is just an expression for a rough estimate. And of course this is a statement about this single marine, and cannot be extrapolated to be an average height of marines in general, especially considering the amount of material which contradicts this.
The man he was compared to was a healthy adult.
It does not get much clearer without actually saying 'he was exactly nine feet.'
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/07 16:18:37
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 16:22:02
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
There are plenty of five feet tall healthy adults.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 16:24:47
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
He wasn't exactly portrayed as smaller than average, and while he might have been 5 ft, that would put the Marine at 7'6"- well above your Holy Truth of 7 ft.
Is there still anything useful coming out of the argument at this point?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/07 16:25:19
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 16:33:41
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
Ashiraya wrote:
He wasn't exactly portrayed as smaller than average, and while he might have been 5 ft, that would put the Marine at 7'6"- well above your Holy Truth of 7 ft.
Oh, that would be perfectly acceptable. Marines are not clones after all, so there has to be some variation between the individuals. Seven feet is just the average height.
Is there still anything useful coming out of the argument at this point?
Seems rather unlikely. Perhaps someone finds it entertaining?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/07 16:34:02
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 16:48:13
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Pulsating Possessed Chaos Marine
|
Crimson wrote: Ashiraya wrote:
He wasn't exactly portrayed as smaller than average, and while he might have been 5 ft, that would put the Marine at 7'6"- well above your Holy Truth of 7 ft.
Oh, that would be perfectly acceptable. Marines are not clones after all, so there has to be some variation between the individuals. Seven feet is just the average height.
Is there still anything useful coming out of the argument at this point?
Seems rather unlikely. Perhaps someone finds it entertaining?
I certainly consider this proper entertainment  this size thing has been talked about already anyway so let bygones be bygones
|
"Glory to the Iron father!"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 16:52:08
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
Lord Tarkin wrote: Ashiraya wrote:Interesting. So, between the models and various books, there is precedent for everything between 6 and 10 feet.
Lovely.
Pretty much, I guess. 10 ft? Who was that tall?
Calgar from god-knows-where, and Pasinaus from the Ultramarines Omnibus.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 16:56:53
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Pulsating Possessed Chaos Marine
|
Selym wrote: Lord Tarkin wrote: Ashiraya wrote:Interesting. So, between the models and various books, there is precedent for everything between 6 and 10 feet.
Lovely.
Pretty much, I guess. 10 ft? Who was that tall?
Calgar from god-knows-where, and Pasinaus from the Ultramarines Omnibus.
Wasn't Pasanius noted as being really tall but never really clarified his exact height? We just don't know
|
"Glory to the Iron father!"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 17:50:16
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'
|
Sorry, should have given a link to my gallery image.
And a brighter picture but without a regular figure to compare to:
|
Be Pure!
Be Vigilant!
BEHAVE!
Show me your god and I'll send you a warhead because my god's bigger than your god. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 17:52:06
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
That's a pretty big gun.
It's really impressive for a scratchbuild, though.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/07 18:07:24
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 17:55:24
Subject: Re:Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Nope. Nothing more to say.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/07 17:55:45
Adepta Sororitas: 3,800 Points
Adeptus Custodes: 8,100 Points
Adeptus Mechanicus: 8,400 Points
Alpha Legion: 4,400 Points
Astra Militarum: 7,500 Points
Dark Angels: 16,800 Points
Imperial Knights: 12,500 Points
Legio Titanicus: 5,500 Points
Slaaneshi Daemons: 3,800 Points
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 20:50:55
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'
|
Ashiraya wrote:That's a pretty big gun.
It's really impressive for a scratchbuild, though.
Yep, it's heavy bolter sized and those are ork arms under all that Green Stuff. After digging out the figure to make certain he measures 50mm high!!! Even at 30mm scale that puts him at roughly nine feet and four inches tall.
The most important thing for me on that model (and my subsequent MK II Marine, although when I start my next one it will be more like MK V) is that the helmet got a size increase too. Someone mentioned earlier that the heads and helmets are the same size, which is true, and also whenever you see a 'Truescale' Space Marine the helmets are never modified. I did make a correctly proportioned 54mm Marine and, based on that model, the main body of the helmets at 28mm are the exact right size (if you discount the pipes and things around the edge which are far too bulky) but all the rest of the body proportions are all very wrong. Depending on how you look at it a Marine's lower leg is too long or his upper leg is too short, they have no waist and/or the chest is too wide and heads, hands and feet are all too big.
I think that it is the proportions rather than the sizes which make all Citadel models so wrong as demonstrated by the picture I posted further back in the thread comparing a Cadian with a an actual human being. The same difference applies to the vehicles.
|
Be Pure!
Be Vigilant!
BEHAVE!
Show me your god and I'll send you a warhead because my god's bigger than your god. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 21:05:19
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
I saw someone make really badass truescaled marines by using Tartaros terminators as a base. I'll see if I can dig up the pic.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 21:45:37
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'
|
I've seen those (or some very like them) and those Tartaros legs work great - someone even used the Contemptor Dreadnought head and that was a fantastic idea. My gripe with using termi legs generally is 1. it's expensive and 2. it still doesn't correct the proportions. I really should get on and make a start with my next Truescale Marine but...
|
Be Pure!
Be Vigilant!
BEHAVE!
Show me your god and I'll send you a warhead because my god's bigger than your god. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 21:56:40
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
Main problem with Marine proportions are the too short legs, so using larger termie legs is a logical step. The difficulty with them is that the termie legs are so bulky and hips so wide, that they will easily look weird unless you extensively customise the rest of the body as well. It can look great, but it takes a lot of work as at that point you're basically resculpting half of the model. Personally I just enlarge the power armour legs a bit; it is easy enough that I can actually convert an entire army that way without going mad.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/07 22:15:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 22:27:29
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
Seattle
|
On the topic of BL representation of Space Marines...
Dan Abnett, in one of the Eisenhorn novels, describes one of the White Consuls Space Marines being at a meeting where Inquisitor Eisenhorn, several Lord Generals and other Imperial worthies are present.
The Space Marine is, in the scene, drinking from a cup of tea and, Eisenhorn notes, even going so far as to extend his pinky. Abnett describes said pinky as "the size and shape of an Arbiter's truncheon".
Arbiters only carry one kind of truncheon: the power maul.
...that would make said Space Marine of the White Consuls Chapter abso-fething-lutely huge if his pinky is half a meter long and three centimeters thick.
|
It is best to be a pessimist. You are usually right and, when you're wrong, you're pleasantly surprised. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 22:33:27
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Crazed Zealot
|
Psienesis wrote:Abnett describes said pinky as "the size and shape of an Arbiter's truncheon".
Arbiters only carry one kind of truncheon: the power maul. his pinky is half a meter long and three centimeters thick.
Lewd.
|
|
 |
 |
|