Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/08 22:24:31
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
Seattle
|
Seven or eight feet tall is, while possible for a non-enhanced human, unusually tall. Inhumanly so, by some definitions.
|
It is best to be a pessimist. You are usually right and, when you're wrong, you're pleasantly surprised. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/08 23:36:32
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
Psienesis wrote:Seven or eight feet tall is, while possible for a non-enhanced human, unusually tall. Inhumanly so, by some definitions.
Especially considering that those that reach 8" often only got there through gigantism, which is a genetic defect, not a standard human trait.
In theory, any human could be as large as a SM, have extra lungs/hearts etc, and there are a few (often rare and fatal) examples of humans with at least one SM trait, but they do not have the same genetic makeup as the "average" human. And are thus considered "superhuman" if it does not cause medical issues.
Such as the guy that can run forever, or the kid who has super-efficient lungs.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/09 00:02:24
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Pulsating Possessed Chaos Marine
|
Selym wrote: Psienesis wrote:Seven or eight feet tall is, while possible for a non-enhanced human, unusually tall. Inhumanly so, by some definitions.
Especially considering that those that reach 8" often only got there through gigantism, which is a genetic defect, not a standard human trait.
In theory, any human could be as large as a SM, have extra lungs/hearts etc, and there are a few (often rare and fatal) examples of humans with at least one SM trait, but they do not have the same genetic makeup as the "average" human. And are thus considered "superhuman" if it does not cause medical issues.
Such as the guy that can run forever, or the kid who has super-efficient lungs.
Gigantism exists because people like Waldow get to tall for their feet (namely the achilles heel) to properly support their whole body. SM's were biologically enhanced to specifically be that tall and a dozen times stronger and tougher than a man. A SM's foot is probably size 18 at least and not to mention their bodies are a lot wider so their weight can be evenly distributed through both their legs.
|
"Glory to the Iron father!"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/09 00:15:58
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Lord Tarkin wrote: Selym wrote: Psienesis wrote:Seven or eight feet tall is, while possible for a non-enhanced human, unusually tall. Inhumanly so, by some definitions.
Especially considering that those that reach 8" often only got there through gigantism, which is a genetic defect, not a standard human trait.
In theory, any human could be as large as a SM, have extra lungs/hearts etc, and there are a few (often rare and fatal) examples of humans with at least one SM trait, but they do not have the same genetic makeup as the "average" human. And are thus considered "superhuman" if it does not cause medical issues.
Such as the guy that can run forever, or the kid who has super-efficient lungs.
Gigantism exists because people like Waldow get to tall for their feet (namely the achilles heel) to properly support their whole body. SM's were biologically enhanced to specifically be that tall and a dozen times stronger and tougher than a man. A SM's foot is probably size 18 at least and not to mention their bodies are a lot wider so their weight can be evenly distributed through both their legs.
Given that there are some 6' 8" NBA players with size 20 shoes, I think Space Marines would be in the 30s or 40s.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/09 00:26:57
Subject: Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Pulsating Possessed Chaos Marine
|
Random Dude wrote: Lord Tarkin wrote: Selym wrote: Psienesis wrote:Seven or eight feet tall is, while possible for a non-enhanced human, unusually tall. Inhumanly so, by some definitions.
Especially considering that those that reach 8" often only got there through gigantism, which is a genetic defect, not a standard human trait.
In theory, any human could be as large as a SM, have extra lungs/hearts etc, and there are a few (often rare and fatal) examples of humans with at least one SM trait, but they do not have the same genetic makeup as the "average" human. And are thus considered "superhuman" if it does not cause medical issues.
Such as the guy that can run forever, or the kid who has super-efficient lungs.
Gigantism exists because people like Waldow get to tall for their feet (namely the achilles heel) to properly support their whole body. SM's were biologically enhanced to specifically be that tall and a dozen times stronger and tougher than a man. A SM's foot is probably size 18 at least and not to mention their bodies are a lot wider so their weight can be evenly distributed through both their legs.
Given that there are some 6' 8" NBA players with size 20 shoes, I think Space Marines would be in the 30s or 40s.
Well, I'm size 14 and 6'2 so then yeah, maybe 18 is to small for a marine but needless to say, Marines got enormous feet and a wide body. Probably size 25.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/09 00:28:26
"Glory to the Iron father!"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/09 13:45:22
Subject: Re:Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot
|
I personally like the scale of the Space Marines in "Space Marine" (the game). They are about 7.5 feet or about that compared to the guardsmen who are 6 or slightly shorter. They are a good head or 2 over them when standing next to each other.
|
Regiment: 91st Schrott Experimental Regiment
Regiment Planet: Schrott
Specialization: Salvaged, Heavily Modified, and/or Experimental Mechanized Units.
"SIR! Are you sure this will work!?"
"I HAVE NO IDEA, PULL THE TRIGGER!!!" 91st comms chatter. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/09 17:29:22
Subject: Re:Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
Engine of War wrote:I personally like the scale of the Space Marines in "Space Marine" (the game). They are about 7.5 feet or about that compared to the guardsmen who are 6 or slightly shorter. They are a good head or 2 over them when standing next to each other.
Yea, the game devs did that quite well. I'd happily take that as the correct size of a SM, as it looks rather plausible.
|
|
 |
 |
|