California governor signs bill replacing words 'husband' and 'wife' in state law

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Jihadin**

The terms “husband” and “wife” have been deleted from California’s marriage law under a bill signed into law Monday by Gov. Jerry Brown.

The terms will be replaced with “spouse” to accommodate same-sex marriage, which became legal in the state last year after the Supreme Court struck down a voter-approved ban on it.

SB1306, the bill signed Monday by Brown, takes effect Jan. 1 and reflects the legality of gay marriage after a decade of litigation. The law also removes limits on recognizing same-sex marriages performed out of state.

The language was enacted after voters approved Proposition 22 in 2000. The initiative was struck down by the California Supreme Court in 2008, prompting voters to amend the constitution and ban gay marriage.

Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a lower court's decision ruling the ban unconstitutional. The bill was authored by state Sen. Mark Leno of San Francisco, who said Monday the bill is necessary to update existing state law.

“I am pleased Governor Brown has recognized the importance of this bill, which makes it explicitly clear in state law that every loving couple has the right to marry in California,” Leno said. “This legislation removes outdated and biased language from state codes and recognizes all married spouses equally, regardless of their gender.”

We might be on to something

**whembly**

Good... let's end this ridiculous fight on who can marry whom...

**MrDwhitey**

whembly wrote:
Good... let's end this ridiculous fight on who can marry whom...

Holy gak I agree with you.

**hotsauceman1**

This is odd, because I do hear hay couples refer to spuses as Wife/Husband

**Jihadin**

hotsauceman1 wrote:
This is odd, because I do hear hay couples refer to spuses as Wife/Husband

**Orlanth**

hotsauceman1 wrote:
This is odd, because I do hear hay couples refer to spuses as Wife/Husband

That's their privilege, but it won't be long before its offensive for anyone else to.

**Dreadclaw69**

One of the rare times I'll actually congratulate California

**d-usa**

hotsauceman1 wrote:
This is odd, because I do hear hay couples refer to spuses as Wife/Husband

And other couples (straight and gay) refer to each other as "sweetums and honeypie", "precious and darling", "bitch and donkey-cave" and "Mr. Slave and Master". That doesn't mean that the law should follow personal salutations instead of using the most basic and neutral term that does the job.