Switch Theme:

BattleScribe Data =] Official Feedback Thread [=  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Preacher of the Emperor





Denver, CO, USA

 TheoreticalFish wrote:
Has the data been updated with the new Imperial Agents?

There are the formations for the Sisters of Battle, but I can't find the Inquisition ones yet


Also, are you sure you want to update the existing 2013 data files? Some people will continue to use the digital codex, and we may yet be able to use both for a time. Wouldn't it make more sense to just start a new set of files for Codex: Imperial Agents, duplicate all the data from the 2013 digital codex, add the new formations and Canoness Verydian, and let the two be offered separately when building a force in Batlescribe?

   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka






 MacPhail wrote:
 TheoreticalFish wrote:
Has the data been updated with the new Imperial Agents?

There are the formations for the Sisters of Battle, but I can't find the Inquisition ones yet


Also, are you sure you want to update the existing 2013 data files? Some people will continue to use the digital codex, and we may yet be able to use both for a time. Wouldn't it make more sense to just start a new set of files for Codex: Imperial Agents, duplicate all the data from the 2013 digital codex, add the new formations and Canoness Verydian, and let the two be offered separately when building a force in Batlescribe?


Also we dont know yet with he Old codex isnt being used, the IA book and the current sob book might both be legal. There are places in the IA that say "Including Adepta Sororitas codex"

   
Made in gb
Fresh-Faced New User




So, the Command Squad in the Space Marines Codex is wrong.

The Company Champion if taken replaces his chainsword with a power weapon and a combat shield. You've got the power weapon there, but not the combat shield.

Also, the Apothecary can't take upgrades, as per https://www.facebook.com/1575682476085719/photos/a.1576243776029589.1073741828.1575682476085719/1628732440780722/?type=3&theater

Pay attention to the facebook comments, where warhammer 40k clarifies and says they made a mistake in the FAQ. The apothecary can't take upgrades.
   
Made in us
Frater Militia





Currently, when I upgrade a Seraphim to a Seraphim Superior it gives me an error saying that they can only have a max of one bolt pistol. They can definitely have two as is their default.

I also preferred the previous way the Sisters were set up. For example, to add new Seraphims, Retributers, or Dominions, I now need to add them similar to adding another vehicle to a squadron then in the case of Dominions I then need to select each of the newly added Dominions and select a special weapon and individually delete the extra dominions w/o special weapons that I won't be taking.

Previously it was more like how the Imperial guard is currently set up and I feel that format is much more intuitive and easy to use.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/01/14 11:47:35



 
   
Made in au
Slippery Scout Biker






How the hell do I use Chamber Militant's in an Inquisition list?

I've been looking for hours and I can't find anything straight forward. SOmething about hiding conditionals, no idea what that means.

Adeptus Astartes - Imperial Fists
Blood Angels - Archangels of The Storm
Cult Mechanicus - Agripinaa
Imperial Knights - House Hawkshroud
Astra Militarum - House Hawkshroud Knight Guard
The Tau Empire - Vash'ya Sept 
   
Made in us
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus





Belisaruis Cawl is not showing up as a selectible HQ choice for the Cult Mechanicus Battle Congregation, Standard or War Convocation version

3000
4000 
   
Made in us
Clousseau





East Bay, Ca, US

Hi, I don't see Celestine as an HQ choice for space marines.

 Galas wrote:
I remember when Marmatag was a nooby, all shiney and full of joy. How playing the unbalanced mess of Warhammer40k in a ultra-competitive meta has changed you

Bharring wrote:
He'll actually *change his mind* in the presence of sufficient/sufficiently defended information. Heretic.
 
   
Made in de
Mysterious Techpriest






WrentheFaceless wrote:Belisaruis Cawl is not showing up as a selectible HQ choice for the Cult Mechanicus Battle Congregation, Standard or War Convocation version


well I do.


Marmatag wrote:Hi, I don't see Celestine as an HQ choice for space marines.


That's because its not implemented yet.
https://github.com/BSData/wh40k/issues/3229

Data author for Battlescribe
Found a bug? Join, ask, report:
https://discord.gg/pMXqCqWJRE 
   
Made in br
Fireknife Shas'el




Lisbon, Portugal

Kakophoni (Traitor Legions formation) bonuses aren't showing up - either their citation and the rules texts. Its noise marines have no option to exchange their weapons for a CCW

Also, Noise Champion has only 1 attack in BS, but they have 2 in the codex

---

Magma Cutters special rules aren't explained at all when you have a Maulerfiend with them. BS only gives out its weapon's profile

This message was edited 5 times. Last update was at 2017/01/21 14:31:43


AI & BFG: / BMG: Mr. Freeze, Deathstroke / Battletech: SR, OWA / Fallout Factions: BoS / HGB: Caprice / Malifaux: Arcanists, Guild, Outcasts / MCP: Mutants / SAGA: Ordensstaat / SW Legion: CIS / WWX: Union

 Unit1126PLL wrote:
"FW is unbalanced and going to ruin tournaments."
"Name one where it did that."
"IT JUST DOES OKAY!"

 Shadenuat wrote:
Voted Astra Militarum for a chance for them to get nerfed instead of my own army.
 
   
Made in us
Clousseau





East Bay, Ca, US

It would also be nice if you could select psychic disciplines with the chaos space marines codex. it's very handy being able to print out the powers with my space marines. It'd be nifty if chaos got that too. Also, they cannot select special pistols in a basic MEQ squad

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/01/20 17:32:00


 Galas wrote:
I remember when Marmatag was a nooby, all shiney and full of joy. How playing the unbalanced mess of Warhammer40k in a ultra-competitive meta has changed you

Bharring wrote:
He'll actually *change his mind* in the presence of sufficient/sufficiently defended information. Heretic.
 
   
Made in us
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine




Thanks for all the work everyone does on the Battlescribe. I am coming across a few bugs that I wanted to share.

Android - Cawl does not appear on my Android devices an HQ for Cult Mech yet. He is showing up as the HQ replacement for TPD's in Admech formations.

PC - Uninstalled battlescribe and deleted the dataset. Then reinstalled everything. Cawl now appears as an HQ choice for ADmech detachments. Built a War Convocation, Cawl is a choice in the Cult Mechanicus part of the WarCon, as are Greyfax and Celestine.

General - However, the rule that Cawl brings into play where if he's included in your force you have access to his relics does not seem to be working as Skitarii Alphas and Precepts are do not have access to the relics choices.

9000
8000
Knights / Assassins 800  
   
Made in de
Mysterious Techpriest






Naaris wrote:
Thanks for all the work everyone does on the Battlescribe. I am coming across a few bugs that I wanted to share.

Android - Cawl does not appear on my Android devices an HQ for Cult Mech yet. He is showing up as the HQ replacement for TPD's in Admech formations.

That seems to be a BS bug. We can'T narrow it down to the files since it works on one part and not the other.

PC - Uninstalled battlescribe and deleted the dataset. Then reinstalled everything. Cawl now appears as an HQ choice for ADmech detachments. Built a War Convocation, Cawl is a choice in the Cult Mechanicus part of the WarCon, as are Greyfax and Celestine.

And why shouldn't he? War Convo has a Battle Congregation that requires an HQ choice. Cawl is a valid HQ choice, as is an Enginseer.

General - However, the rule that Cawl brings into play where if he's included in your force you have access to his relics does not seem to be working as Skitarii Alphas and Precepts are do not have access to the relics choices.

They do. I suggest you update your data.


On a more serious note - the guy that started this thread is no longer part of the team.
I know of no other data author that reads this - so effectively your feedback runs into the void. If you have an issue, you still can report it at

https://github.com/BSData/wh40k


Data author for Battlescribe
Found a bug? Join, ask, report:
https://discord.gg/pMXqCqWJRE 
   
Made in us
Clousseau





East Bay, Ca, US

May as well close the thread then? I mean what's the point then if no one is reading it.

 Galas wrote:
I remember when Marmatag was a nooby, all shiney and full of joy. How playing the unbalanced mess of Warhammer40k in a ultra-competitive meta has changed you

Bharring wrote:
He'll actually *change his mind* in the presence of sufficient/sufficiently defended information. Heretic.
 
   
Made in de
Mysterious Techpriest






Well I am
But yes. Was about to request a close from a mod, but it was past midnight and i decided to take nap time .P

Data author for Battlescribe
Found a bug? Join, ask, report:
https://discord.gg/pMXqCqWJRE 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: