Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 00:27:09
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
A Archon supported by a farseer can be HARD to get rid of.
Fortune makes him a real killer.
High toughness creatures can be rough on you..bring in the lowly agonizer and watch those wraithknights eat dirt.
The new dex is about finding units that work together.
I miss the old husk blade but it's gone,gone.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/14 00:27:38
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 10:41:25
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
Why are high-toughness creatures rough on us? Surely we're one of the best armies for dealing with them?
The only high-toughness creatures I have problems with are those with 2+ saves. So, I'll just kit out my Archon for... oh... wait.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 10:50:34
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Stealthy Grot Snipa
|
SisterSydney wrote:[nitpick]Actually the average roll on 1d6 is 3.5, which isn't even possible as the result of any individual roll. Try finding an entry for "3.5" in the Combat Drugs table, I'll wait....[/nitpick] PS Math: (1+2+3+4+5+6)/6 = 3.5 And as 3.5 is not a value that can be obtained using a dice we round to the nearest achievable value; which is 4, as you round 3.5 up.  Yeh archon's arent worthless, but certainly not as interesting or as customisable as our other HQ choices imo. The haemi provides so much more and the succubus is certainly more choppy. A shooty archon isn't bad, but for his cost isn't bringing much more that can't be found elsewhere in our army.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/02/14 10:55:02
Favourite Game: When your Warboss on bike wrecks 3 vehicles simply by HoW - especially when his bike is a custom monowheel.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 10:54:20
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
Solar Shock wrote: SisterSydney wrote:[nitpick]Actually the average roll on 1d6 is 3.5, which isn't even possible as the result of any individual roll. Try finding an entry for "3.5" in the Combat Drugs table, I'll wait....[/nitpick]
PS Math: (1+2+3+4+5+6)/6 = 3.5
And as 3.5 is not a value that can be obtained using a dice we round to the nearest achievable value; which is 4, as you round 3.5 up.
That's a really dicey way to round.
I mean, it just seems like trying to manipulate the facts for no good reason. 3.5 can't be rolled, but it's still the average. If you roll 2 dice, then the average is 7. Using your method, the average jumps to 8 for no good reason.
To put it another way, there's no value whatsoever in rounding at this point. You only round if you need a whole number for some reason, or a more manageable figure after some mathhammer. Rounding the result of a single d6 serves no purpose but to mislead (intentionally or otherwise).
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/02/14 11:46:19
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 12:21:42
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Can we all just agree that you are likely to get something good out of Combat Drugs 2/3 times (Personally don't rate the Initiative one as you still have I6 and what on earth is that Ld Gak)?
I'd argue we still have good weapons in the form of Blasters to deal with High Toughness 2+, which is why I'm considering 2x 5 units of Trueborn. Not ideal, but it's there, if need be.
|
YMDC = nightmare |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 12:33:35
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
Frozocrone wrote:
I'd argue we still have good weapons in the form of Blasters to deal with High Toughness 2+, which is why I'm considering 2x 5 units of Trueborn. Not ideal, but it's there, if need be.
Well, Dreadknights are a massive pain in that regard as they have a 5++ save and a cheap psychic power to make it a 4++.
Statistically, you need 14-15 blaster shots to take them down. So, those two trueborn squads would have to fire at the Dreadknight, then both survive and fire at it again next turn. Just saying.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 13:57:23
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
vipoid wrote: Frozocrone wrote:
I'd argue we still have good weapons in the form of Blasters to deal with High Toughness 2+, which is why I'm considering 2x 5 units of Trueborn. Not ideal, but it's there, if need be.
Well, Dreadknights are a massive pain in that regard as they have a 5++ save and a cheap psychic power to make it a 4++.
Statistically, you need 14-15 blaster shots to take them down. So, those two trueborn squads would have to fire at the Dreadknight, then both survive and fire at it again next turn. Just saying.
Yeah, I think firing your Blasterborn at a Dreadknight, when you can pour poison shots into it, is a little bit of a waste. I find Venoms full of Warriors with one Blaster to be pretty decent at whittling down Dreadknights since we can spam them due to their relative cheapness. At 12 inches, that's 20 poison shots and one AP2 shot per Venom. Not too shabby.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 14:18:26
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
In case anyone is interested, those warriors with blaster in a venom (in rapid fire range) average 1.4 wounds on a dreadknight.
As a question, do you guys think its better to disembark passengers to fire at a DK, or leave them embarked? Assume the DK has a Heavy Incinerator and Heavy Psycannon.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 14:20:21
Subject: Re:From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Anyone else looking at the Harlequin 12" -2 Ld bubble artifact stacking with armor of misery and coven formations? -4 Ld bubble FTW.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 14:23:09
Subject: Re:From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
mercury14 wrote:Anyone else looking at the Harlequin 12" -2 Ld bubble artifact stacking with armor of misery and coven formations? -4 Ld bubble FTW.
What would you use it for?
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 14:34:18
Subject: Re:From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
vipoid wrote:mercury14 wrote:Anyone else looking at the Harlequin 12" -2 Ld bubble artifact stacking with armor of misery and coven formations? -4 Ld bubble FTW.
What would you use it for?
Forcing morale checks? In the opponents' deployment zone perhaps? Sweeping them in CC.
Necrons getting swept in CC circumvents their RP.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 15:21:42
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
vipoid wrote:In case anyone is interested, those warriors with blaster in a venom (in rapid fire range) average 1.4 wounds on a dreadknight.
As a question, do you guys think its better to disembark passengers to fire at a DK, or leave them embarked? Assume the DK has a Heavy Incinerator and Heavy Psycannon.
Yeah, that sounds about right. That's why I mentioned it works because the Warrior/Venom combo is so cheap we can bring lots of them. And two cheap HQs in Venoms as well. Dreadknights are good but they're still just four wound MCs. Automatically Appended Next Post: vipoid wrote:mercury14 wrote:Anyone else looking at the Harlequin 12" -2 Ld bubble artifact stacking with armor of misery and coven formations? -4 Ld bubble FTW.
What would you use it for?
Check out the new Harlequin psychic powers. Numbers 5 and 6, specifically. Couple one of those with -5 Ld from Shadowseer Mask, Armor of Misery, and Covens formation. And if you're really frisky, run a DE/ CWE/Harlie list where you also take a Farseer with Psychic Shriek.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/14 15:24:19
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 15:26:54
Subject: Re:From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
And a Hemlock.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 15:49:57
Subject: Re:From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
You're thinking of the old book - the new one doesn't have that weakness.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 17:07:22
Subject: Re:From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
vipoid wrote:
You're thinking of the old book - the new one doesn't have that weakness.
Sure it does. If my Harlies assault a group of Immortals, win combat by 2, and they eat a -3 leadership penalty from the relic plus nearby coven unit, they need to roll 5 or less or they break. And they have almost no chance to avoid being swept.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 17:08:46
Subject: Re:From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
mercury14 wrote:Sure it does. If my Harlies assault a group of Immortals, win combat by 2, and they eat a -3 leadership penalty from the relic plus nearby coven unit, they need to roll 5 or less or they break. And they have almost no chance to avoid being swept.
I don't understand - how is that bypassing their RPs?
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 17:21:06
Subject: Re:From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
vipoid wrote:mercury14 wrote:Sure it does. If my Harlies assault a group of Immortals, win combat by 2, and they eat a -3 leadership penalty from the relic plus nearby coven unit, they need to roll 5 or less or they break. And they have almost no chance to avoid being swept.
I don't understand - how is that bypassing their RPs?
I should have said it bypasses models altogether.
Kisses can partially bypass their RP though.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/14 17:21:57
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 17:29:40
Subject: Re:From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
vipoid wrote:mercury14 wrote:Sure it does. If my Harlies assault a group of Immortals, win combat by 2, and they eat a -3 leadership penalty from the relic plus nearby coven unit, they need to roll 5 or less or they break. And they have almost no chance to avoid being swept.
I don't understand - how is that bypassing their RPs?
It doesn't bypass it. They still get it, but the possible -5 Ld means you just have to kill one of them in CC, to make them effectively Ld 4, which makes is pretty easy to sweep them. So if I charge my Grotesquerie into a 20 man block of Warriors with D-Lord/Kryptek or whatever SC they have, all I need to do is enough wounds to make them have to test leadership. Once I force a leadership test on them, they stand a really, really good chance of getting swept. So even if I only kill one or two Warriors, that could be enough.
Due to the super resiliency of the new Necrons, sweeping them in CC seems to be the only effective way to kill them in any kind of large numbers. The Harlie/ DE/ CWE alliance gives us tools which makes that much easier.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 17:57:00
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Stealthy Grot Snipa
|
vipoid wrote: That's a really dicey way to round.
Primarily I was kidding, but mathematically you round a .5 up in the circumstance of needing a single digit value. sweetbacon wrote: Due to the super resiliency of the new Necrons, sweeping them in CC seems to be the only effective way to kill them in any kind of large numbers. The Harlie/DE/CWE alliance gives us tools which makes that much easier. Interesting, but in reality that is true for any/all units as leadership tests are. But I see what you mean with regards to necrons, rather than trying to force your way through 2 saves you can simply use CC to wipe them, as they have a low initiative anyway. Means either needing to keep the bubble as the unit forcing the checks, or as a nearby unit. Could be good fun to throw in a hemlock.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/14 17:57:17
Favourite Game: When your Warboss on bike wrecks 3 vehicles simply by HoW - especially when his bike is a custom monowheel.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 18:25:12
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Solar Shock wrote:vipoid wrote:
That's a really dicey way to round.
Primarily I was kidding, but mathematically you round a .5 up in the circumstance of needing a single digit value.
sweetbacon wrote:
Due to the super resiliency of the new Necrons, sweeping them in CC seems to be the only effective way to kill them in any kind of large numbers. The Harlie/DE/CWE alliance gives us tools which makes that much easier.
Interesting, but in reality that is true for any/all units as leadership tests are. But I see what you mean with regards to necrons, rather than trying to force your way through 2 saves you can simply use CC to wipe them, as they have a low initiative anyway. Means either needing to keep the bubble as the unit forcing the checks, or as a nearby unit. Could be good fun to throw in a hemlock.
Yes, thats exactly what I meant. Trying to kill a 20 man Warrior blob which has a 4+/4++ (with Decurion), and which also re-rolls ones (possibly) through shooting will take your entire army. And even then you'll probably have to shoot everything you have it for multiple turns. And that's just one basic troops unit. Using the Ld decreasing/wounding tools at our disposal as DE/ CWE/Harlequins seems like a much more efficient way to deal with Necrons now.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 18:55:34
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
In terms of killing a 20-man warrior block, what would you use against it in combat?
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 19:03:18
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
vipoid wrote:In terms of killing a 20-man warrior block, what would you use against it in combat?
As DE, I would use the only really viable CC unit we have, the Grotesquerie, with Succubus w/AoM, with Shadowseer w/Mask.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 19:40:02
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
sweetbacon wrote: vipoid wrote:In terms of killing a 20-man warrior block, what would you use against it in combat?
As DE, I would use the only really viable CC unit we have, the Grotesquerie, with Succubus w/AoM, with Shadowseer w/Mask.
You don't think Dark Artisan is viable?
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 19:54:53
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
vipoid wrote:sweetbacon wrote: vipoid wrote:In terms of killing a 20-man warrior block, what would you use against it in combat?
As DE, I would use the only really viable CC unit we have, the Grotesquerie, with Succubus w/AoM, with Shadowseer w/Mask.
You don't think Dark Artisan is viable?
Oh yeah, the DA is absolutely viable. And they would also work well as a CC unit/tarpit for Necrons. I cited the Grotesquerie as an example because I wanted the -5 Ld debuff that I get with the AoM and Shadowseer Mask artefact. Since a Shadowseer can't join the DA, the Grotesques with Succubus and Shadowseer are my preferred Ld debuffing CC unit.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 20:04:34
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
I hadn't actually realised the Shadowseer was an IC now - I'd assumed he was still an upgrade for a Harlequin troupe.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/14 20:27:13
Subject: Re:From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
You may be right. I'll have to double check that one.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/15 07:06:27
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Stalwart Strike Squad Grey Knight
|
vipoid wrote:I hadn't actually realised the Shadowseer was an IC now - I'd assumed he was still an upgrade for a Harlequin troupe.
Nope! New Shadowseers are IC's in the Elites slot.
|
Armies Played: Grey Knights Tyranids Harlequins (WIP) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/15 11:33:26
Subject: Re:From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Awesome!. Thanks.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/15 13:22:41
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
I've been looking into ways to sweep the necron in close combat as well. I haven't read their codex, so I am curious whether they have ways to make units fearless or stubborn before I rush into that strategy. Does anyone know if they have characters, wargear, or formation bonuses that would convey those rules?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/15 13:38:59
Subject: From the Void- Dark Eldar Tactica for 7th Codex
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
As far as I'm aware, the best they can do is reroll morale tests.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
|